Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2011 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 0.7 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, with output and hours worked rising 1.3 percent and 2.0 percent,…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2011, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 0.7 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, with output and hours worked rising 1.3 percent and 2.0 percent, respectively. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the second quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2011, output increased 2.4 percent while hours rose 1.6 percent, yielding an increase in productivity of 0.7 percent. (See tables A and 2.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses rose 3.3 percent in the second quarter of 2011, because hourly compensation increased 2.7 percent while productivity decreased 0.7 percent. Over the last four quarters, hourly compensation increased more than output per hour, and unit labor costs rose 1.9 percent. (See tables A and 2.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity fell 1.5 percent in the second quarter of 2011, as output rose 1.2 percent and hours increased 2.7 percent. Productivity declined 2.7 percent in the durable goods sector and increased 1.3 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Over the last four quarters, total manufacturing productivity increased 2.4 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing rose 4.6 percent in the second quarter of 2011 and 0.4 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A, 3, 4, and 5.)

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Preliminary data for the second quarter of 2011 for the nonfinancial corporate sector also were released today. Productivity increased 4.4 percent as output and hours rose 7.5 percent and 3.0 percent, respectively. (See tables C and 6.)

Revised Measures

The measures released today were based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Tables B and C present previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: nonfarm business, business and manufacturing, as well as nonfinancial corporations.

In the second quarter of 2011, nonfarm business productivity decreased 0.7 percent, rather than 0.3 percent, reflecting a downward revision of 0.5 percentage points to output; hours were not revised. Hourly compensation increased 2.7 percent in the second quarter, a larger gain than reported August 9. The increase in unit labor costs was revised up to 3.3 percent. In the manufacturing sector, productivity showed a smaller decline than previously reported, 1.5 percent, due to an upward revision to output; hours were revised up slightly. Unit labor costs increased 4.6 percent rather than 4.4 percent.

In the first quarter of 2011, nonfarm business productivity growth was not revised. Unit labor costs increased 6.2 percent, rather than the previous estimate of 4.8 percent, due solely to an upward revision to hourly compensation. The first-quarter increase in unit labor costs follows a 2.0 percent decline from 2009 to 2010, the largest in the annual series. In manufacturing, productivity growth was not revised. Unit labor costs fell 0.1 percent, rather than 1.1 percent, due to an upward revision to hourly compensation.

Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity growth in the first quarter of 2011 was revised up to 2.3 percent from the preliminary estimate of 1.4 percent. (See tables C and 6.)

Manufacturing sector productivity, output, and unit labor costs series were revised back to 1987 to reflect revised output indexes constructed by BLS using data from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Manufacturing productivity was revised up for the years 2009 and 2010, and the average annual rate of growth from 2007 to 2010 is now 2.0 percent, compared to 1.6 percent as of August 9. Revised annual index series appear in appendix tables 1-3. Full historical annual and quarterly measures can be found on the productivity and costs home page at www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 1, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 2, 2011Publication referenceSep 1, 201130 days laterOct 1, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.55%Observed 4.22%Observed −33 bps vs. earlier reference4.01%Observed −21 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 1, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.25%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jun 2, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Jun 9, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 16, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jun 30, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · Jul 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.52% · Jul 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jul 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 4, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Aug 11, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Aug 18, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Aug 25, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Sep 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.01% · Sep 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Oct 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Oct 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.11% · Oct 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Nov 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Nov 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Dec 1, 2011Jun 1, 2011Sep 1, 2011Dec 1, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,470.56/month

4.22% · Sep 1, 2011

At the later reference$1,433.98/month

4.01% · Sep 29, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $36.58 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →