Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2011 First Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.8 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The gain in productivity reflects increases of 3.2 percent in output…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2011, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.8 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The gain in productivity reflects increases of 3.2 percent in output and 1.4 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the first quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2011, output increased 3.2 percent while hours rose 1.9 percent, yielding an increase in productivity of 1.3 percent. (See tables A and 2.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses rose 0.7 percent in the first quarter of 2011, as a 2.5 percent increase in hourly compensation outpaced the 1.8 percent gain in productivity. Unit labor costs also rose 0.7 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 2.) In the first quarter of 2011, the consumer price series increased at a 5.3 percent annual rate, resulting in a decline of 2.6 percent in real hourly compensation.

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them. Real hourly compensation is equal to hourly compensation divided by the consumer price series.

Manufacturing sector productivity grew 4.2 percent in the first quarter of 2011, as output and hours worked increased 7.7 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 4.1 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing declined 1.4 percent in the first quarter of 2011 and 0.7 percent over the last four quarters.

Productivity increased 7.5 percent in the durable goods sector and 2.6 percent in the nondurable goods sector in the first quarter of 2011. In durable goods industries, a 14.0 percent jump in output outweighed a 6.1 percent increase in hours worked. Nondurable goods production rose 1.5 percent while hours fell 1.1 percent. (See tables A, 3, 4 and 5.)

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Preliminary first quarter 2011 measures of productivity and costs were announced for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 4.1 percent in the first quarter of 2011 as output and hours rose 6.2 percent and 2.0 percent, respectively. (See tables C and 6.)

Revised measures

The measures released today were based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Table B presents previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing, for the first quarter of 2011 and the fourth quarter of 2010.

In the first quarter of 2011, nonfarm business productivity growth was revised up to 1.8 percent from the 1.6 percent preliminary estimate, reflecting an upward revision to output. Unit labor costs increased 0.7 percent in the first quarter, a slightly smaller gain than reported May 5. In the manufacturing sector, productivity growth in the first quarter was revised down to 4.2 percent from 6.3 percent due to a downward revision to output. Unit labor costs declined 1.4 percent rather than falling 3.5 percent as previously reported.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, nonfarm business productivity was unrevised, while a 1.8 percentage point downward revision to hourly compensation resulted in a larger decline in unit labor costs (-2.8 percent) than was previously reported. In the manufacturing sector, a downward revision to productivity and an upward revision to hourly compensation resulted in a smaller decline in unit labor costs than was reported on May 5. In the nonfinancial corporate sector, productivity growth was revised down to 1.6 percent from a previous estimate of 2.6 percent.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, first quarter 2011

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, first quarter 2011

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2010

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jun 2, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierMay 3, 2011Publication referenceJun 2, 201130 days laterJul 2, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.78%Observed 4.55%Observed −23 bps vs. earlier reference4.51%Observed −4 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Mar 2, 2011 – Sep 2, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jun 2, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.50%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.87% · Mar 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.88% · Mar 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.76% · Mar 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Mar 24, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.86% · Mar 31, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.87% · Apr 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.91% · Apr 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.80% · Apr 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · Apr 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · May 5, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.63% · May 12, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.61% · May 19, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · May 26, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jun 2, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Jun 9, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 16, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jun 30, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · Jul 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.52% · Jul 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jul 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 4, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Aug 11, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Aug 18, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Aug 25, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 2011Mar 2, 2011Jun 2, 2011Sep 2, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,528.98/month

4.55% · Jun 2, 2011

At the later reference$1,521.84/month

4.51% · Jun 30, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $7.14 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →