Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2011 Third Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, with output and hours worked rising 3.2 percent and 0.8 percent,…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2011, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, with output and hours worked rising 3.2 percent and 0.8 percent, respectively. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2011, output increased 2.4 percent as hours rose 1.4 percent, resulting in a 0.9 percent increase in productivity. (See tables A and 2.) Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

The productivity measures released today are based on more recent and more complete data than were available for the preliminary report issued November 3. (See Revised measures.)

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses fell 2.5 percent in the third quarter of 2011, reflecting the 2.3 percent increase in output per hour combined with a 0.2 percent decline in hourly compensation. Unit labor costs rose 0.4 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A and 2.) BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Nonfarm business real hourly compensation decreased 3.2 percent in the third quarter of 2011, reflecting a 0.2 percent decline in hourly compensation combined with a 3.1 percent increase in consumer prices (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Real hourly compensation is the ratio of hourly compensation to consumer prices. This measure declined 2.3 percent from the same quarter a year ago; this is the largest decline in this series which begins in 1948.

Manufacturing sector productivity grew 5.0 percent in the third quarter of 2011, as output rose 4.6 percent and hours decreased 0.4 percent. Productivity jumped 9.5 percent in the durable goods sector and edged up 0.1 percent in the nondurable goods sector. (See tables A, 3, 4, and 5.) From the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2011, manufacturing sector productivity increased 2.9 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 5.1 percent in the third quarter of 2011 and decreased 1.9 percent over the last four quarters.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Third quarter data for the nonfinancial corporate sector was released today. Output per hour decreased 2.6 percent as output declined 0.8 percent and hours grew 1.9 percent. Unit labor costs rose 3.0 percent. (See table C.)

Revised measures

Previous and revised productivity and related measures for the second and third quarters for the nonfarm business, business, and manufacturing sectors and for the second quarter for nonfinancial corporations are presented in tables B and C, respectively.

In the third quarter of 2011, nonfarm business sector productivity growth was 2.3 percent reflecting a downward revision to output combined with a slight upward revision to hours worked. Unit labor costs were little changed, as the downward revision to productivity was offset by a downward revision to hourly compensation. In the manufacturing sector, productivity growth was 5.0 percent rather than 5.4 percent as previously reported. Unit labor costs declined 5.1 percent.

In the second quarter of 2011, nonfarm business sector productivity, output, and hours were unrevised. Unit labor costs fell 0.1 percent rather than increasing 2.8 percent due solely to a downward revision to hourly compensation. Manufacturing sector productivity declined 2.2 percent in the second quarter, slightly less than reported November 3. Unit labor costs increased 0.1 percent, much less than the 5.5 percent preliminary estimate, due to a steep downward revision to hourly compensation and the slight upward revision to productivity. The large downward revision to manufacturing hourly compensation was concentrated in durable goods manufacturing industries.

Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity grew 3.2 percent in the second quarter of 2011, as revised. (See tables C and 6.)

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2011

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2011

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2011

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2011

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 30, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 31, 2011Publication referenceNov 30, 201130 days laterDec 30, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.10%Observed 3.98%Observed −12 bps vs. earlier reference3.95%Observed −3 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 30, 2011 – Feb 29, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 30, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.00%4.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Sep 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.01% · Sep 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Oct 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Oct 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.11% · Oct 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Nov 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Nov 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Dec 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Dec 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Dec 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Dec 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Dec 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jan 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.89% · Jan 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Jan 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jan 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Feb 23, 2012Aug 30, 2011Nov 30, 2011Feb 29, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,428.79/month

3.98% · Nov 23, 2011

At the later reference$1,423.61/month

3.95% · Dec 29, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $5.18 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →