Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2011 Fourth Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 0.7 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The gain in productivity reflects increases of 3.6 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages 2011, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 0.7 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The gain in productivity reflects increases of 3.6 percent in output and 2.9 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the fourth quarter of 2010 to the fourth quarter of 2011, productivity grew 0.5 percent, as output rose 2.3 percent and hours rose 1.8 percent. (See table A.) Annual average productivity increased 0.7 percent from 2010 to 2011. (See table C.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses increased 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011, as productivity grew at a slower rate (0.7 percent) than hourly compensation (1.9 percent). Unit labor costs rose 1.3 percent over the last four quarters. (See table A.) Annual average unit labor costs increased 1.2 percent from 2010 to 2011. (See table C.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity declined 0.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011, as output rose 3.8 percent and hours worked increased 4.2 percent; this is the largest quarterly gain in hours worked since the fourth quarter of 2005 (4.8 percent). Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 1.7 percent. Annual average productivity grew 2.8 percent from 2010 to 2011. Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 1.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011 but decreased 1.1 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A, C and 3.)

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

In the manufacturing sector, productivity grew 2.8 percent in 2011, reflecting a 4.9 percent increase in output combined with a 2.0 percent increase in hours; this is the largest annual increase in manufacturing sector hours since a 2.3 percent gain in 1994. Unit labor costs in the manufacturing sector fell 1.3 percent in 2011.

Revised measures

Revised and previous measures for the third quarter of 2011 are shown in tables B and D and cover the following major sectors: nonfarm business, business, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corporations. Measures for the nonfinancial corporate sector include historically revised gross product of nonfinancial corporate business in chained (2005) dollars, published December 22, 2011 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

In the third quarter of 2011, nonfarm business productivity growth was 1.9 percent, reflecting a downward revision to output and a slight upward revision to hours. (See table B.) Unit labor costs for the nonfarm business sector fell 2.1 percent in the third quarter, less than previously reported.

In the nonfinancial corporate (NFC) sector, quarterly percent changes in productivity and unit labor costs were not revised for the third quarter, although indexes for these and other measures related to output were revised historically.

Effective with this release, measures for the NFC sector, previously beginning in 1958, have been extended back to 1947. These newly-introduced data for the pre-1958 period are based upon the same methodology and data sources as those for 1958 forward. Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity grew at a 2.4 percent average annual rate from 1947 to 2010.

Quarterly and annual data for all sectors from 2009 to 2011 appear in tables 1-6 and revised historical annual data for the nonfinancial corporate sector in appendix table 1. Full historical measures can be found on the productivity and costs home page at http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

Data in this release do not reflect the annual benchmark revision of the BLS Current Employment Statistics program data to be released February 3, 2012. This benchmark will be incorporated in our next release on March 7, 2012.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2011

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 2, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 3, 2012Publication referenceFeb 2, 201230 days laterMar 3, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.95%Observed 3.87%Observed −8 bps vs. earlier reference3.90%Observed +3 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 2, 2011 – May 2, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 2, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.00%4.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Nov 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Nov 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Dec 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Dec 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Dec 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Dec 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Dec 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jan 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.89% · Jan 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Jan 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jan 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Feb 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Mar 1, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Mar 8, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.92% · Mar 15, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 4.08% · Mar 22, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Mar 29, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Apr 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Apr 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 26, 2012Nov 2, 2011Feb 2, 2012May 2, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,409.85/month

3.87% · Feb 2, 2012

At the later reference$1,415.00/month

3.90% · Mar 1, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $5.15 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →