Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2012 First Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 0.5 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2012, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The decline in productivity reflects increases of 2.7 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2012, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 0.5 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2012, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The decline in productivity reflects increases of 2.7 percent in output and 3.2 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012, productivity increased 0.5 percent as output and hours worked rose 2.8 percent and 2.2 percent, respectively. (See table A.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses increased 2.0 percent in the first quarter of 2012, while hourly compensation increased 1.5 percent. Unit labor costs rose 2.1 percent over the last four quarters. (See table A.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity rose 5.9 percent in the first quarter of 2012, as output grew 10.8 percent and hours worked increased 4.6 percent. The increases in productivity and output were the largest since the second quarter of 2010. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing sector productivity increased 2.5 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 4.2 percent in the first quarter of 2012 and decreased 1.3 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 3.)

Preliminary fourth quarter and annual 2011 measures were announced today for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 3.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011, as output grew faster than hours worked. Annual average productivity for the nonfinancial corporate sector increased 0.4 percent in 2011. (See tables C and 6.)

The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing and nonfinancial corporate output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.

Revised measures

Revised measures of real hourly compensation for all sectors for 2007 onward reflect revisions in the consumer price series based on new and revised data from the BLS Office of Prices and Living Conditions. Output data measures for the manufacturing sector incorporate historically revised indexes of industrial production published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on March 30. Accordingly, manufacturing output, productivity, and unit labor cost measures were revised back to 1987. (See appendix tables 1-3.) Full historical annual and quarterly measures are available on the labor productivity and costs home page: http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, nonfarm business productivity growth was 1.2 percent, an upward revision due solely to a downward revision to hours worked. Unit labor costs rose 2.7 percent, slightly less than previously reported. Manufacturing productivity rose 0.6 percent in the fourth quarter, rather than declining, reflecting an upward revision to output combined with a slight downward revision to hours worked. (See table B.)

Annual Average measures of productivity and unit labor costs for the nonfarm business sector increased at the same rates from 2010 to 2011 as previously reported. In the manufacturing sector, productivity increased 2.5 percent, slightly less than reported March 7, as output was revised down.(See table B.)

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2011

Percent change, annual average 2011

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2011

Percent change, annual average 2011

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 3, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 3, 2012Publication referenceMay 3, 201230 days laterJun 2, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.99%Observed 3.84%Observed −15 bps vs. earlier reference3.75%Observed −9 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 3, 2012 – Aug 3, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 3, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.75%4.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Feb 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Mar 1, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Mar 8, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.92% · Mar 15, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 4.08% · Mar 22, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Mar 29, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Apr 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Apr 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.84% · May 3, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.83% · May 10, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.79% · May 17, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.78% · May 24, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.75% · May 31, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.67% · Jun 7, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.71% · Jun 14, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 28, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Jul 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Jul 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jul 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Jul 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Aug 2, 2012Feb 3, 2012May 3, 2012Aug 3, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,404.71/month

3.84% · May 3, 2012

At the later reference$1,389.35/month

3.75% · May 31, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $15.37 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →