Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2012 Second Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.6 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2012, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 2.0 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2012, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.6 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2012, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 2.0 percent in output and 0.4 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the second quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2012, productivity increased 1.1 percent as output and hours worked rose 2.9 percent and 1.8 percent, respectively. (See table A.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses increased 1.7 percent in the second quarter of 2012, while hourly compensation increased 3.3 percent. Unit labor costs rose 0.8 percent over the last four quarters. (See table A.)

Data in this release reflect the regular multi-year revision to the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce on July 27, 2012. See Revised measures.

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity rose 0.2 percent in the second quarter of 2012, as output grew 1.7 percent and hours worked increased 1.4 percent. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 2.9 percent, as output increased 5.6 percent and hours rose 2.6 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing rose 0.3 percent in the second quarter of 2012 and decreased 2.9 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 3.)

Revised first-quarter 2012 measures of productivity and costs were announced for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 1.2 percent in the first quarter of 2012, as output and hours rose 4.7 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively. (See tables D and 6.)

The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing and nonfinancial corporate output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.

Revised measures

Measures of output for the business, nonfarm business, and nonfinancial corporate (NFC) sectors, and compensation for all sectors incorporate the revised National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) data released on July 27 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. As a result, output was revised back to the first quarter of 2009 for the business, nonfarm business, and NFC sectors. Compensation was subject to revisions back to the first quarter of 2008 for the business and nonfarm business sectors, and back to the first quarter of 2009 for the manufacturing and NFC sectors. Furthermore, hours were subject to revisions back to the first quarter of 2008 for the business, nonfarm business, and NFC sectors, due to revised NIPA data on compensation of all employees and employment in government enterprises. Measures of manufacturing output were revised back to 1987 to reflect revised output indexes constructed by BLS using data from the U.S. Department of Commerce; manufacturing hours were revised back to the first quarter of 2012.

As a result of the revisions, productivity and related measures were revised in the business, nonfarm business, and NFC sectors back to the first quarter of 2008. In the manufacturing sector, productivity and related measures were subject to revisions back to 1987.

In the first quarter of 2012, nonfarm business productivity declined 0.5 percent, a smaller decline than reported in the preliminary estimate. The revised figure reflects an upward revision to output and a slight downward revision to hours. Unit labor costs grew 5.6 percent in the first quarter, due primarily to a large upward revision to hourly compensation. In the manufacturing sector, productivity growth in the first quarter was 5.5 percent, as output growth was revised up and hours were revised down. Unit labor costs declined 0.4 percent, rather than decreasing 4.9 percent as previously reported.

For the year 2011, nonfarm business productivity growth was 0.7 percent, an upward revision from the previous estimate of 0.4 percent. (See table C.) Unit labor costs increased 2.0 percent, a larger increase than reported June 6. Manufacturing productivity increased at the same 2.5 percent rate that was reported previously. The 0.1 percent increase in unit labor costs was more than the 1.0 percent decline published June 6, due to an upward revision to hourly compensation.

For the year 2010, nonfarm business productivity growth was revised down to 3.1 percent from the previous estimate of 4.0 percent due to a downward revision in output. (See table C.) Unit labor costs declined 1.0 percent, a smaller decline than reported June 6. Manufacturing productivity increased 6.4 percent, slightly less than reported previously. The 5.0 percent decline in unit labor costs was more than the 4.7 percent decline published June 6.

For the year 2009, nonfarm business productivity growth was 2.9 percent, as the decline in output was less than previously reported. (See table C.) Unit labor costs showed a decline of 1.5 percent, after revision. In manufacturing, productivity grew 0.1 percent, rather than 0.5 percent. Unit labor costs were not revised, increasing 4.0 percent.

Over the most recent ten-year period (2001-2011) nonfarm business productivity increased at an average annual rate of 2.2 percent. Manufacturing productivity grew at an annual average rate of 3.3 percent.

In the nonfinancial corporate sector, first-quarter 2012 productivity growth was 1.2 percent; the preliminary estimate was 0.3 percent. For the years 2011 and 2010, productivity growth was greater than previously reported, due to an upward revision in output. (See tables D and 6.)

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing

Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing

Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, first quarter 2012

Percent change, annual average

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 8, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 9, 2012Publication referenceAug 8, 201230 days laterSep 7, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.62%Observed 3.55%Observed −7 bps vs. earlier reference3.55%Observed Unchanged vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 8, 2012 – Nov 8, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 8, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.50%4.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.83% · May 10, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.79% · May 17, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.78% · May 24, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.75% · May 31, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.67% · Jun 7, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.71% · Jun 14, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 28, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Jul 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Jul 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jul 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Jul 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Aug 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Aug 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Aug 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 30, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 13, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Sep 20, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Sep 27, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.36% · Oct 4, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Oct 11, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.37% · Oct 18, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.41% · Oct 25, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Nov 1, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Nov 8, 2012May 8, 2012Aug 8, 2012Nov 8, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,355.52/month

3.55% · Aug 2, 2012

At the later reference$1,355.52/month

3.55% · Sep 6, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is unchanged. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →