Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2002 Third Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2002. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2002

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2002. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

4.3 percent in the business sector and 4.0 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

Productivity increased 4.3 percent in the business sector, as output grew 4.1 percent and hours declined 0.1 percent. The 4.0 percent increase in nonfarm business productivity also reflected a 4.1 percent growth in output, but a 0.1 percent rise in nonfarm business hours (table A).

In manufacturing, productivity increases in the third quarter were:

5.9 percent in manufacturing, 8.8 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 2.0 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The increase in manufacturing productivity compares with a 4.2-percent rise reported for the previous quarter (as revised). Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 16 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Effective with today's release, measures of hourly compensation and unit labor costs will be revised for the previous two quarters when preliminary estimates for a new quarter are released. Previously, only the most recent quarter of data was revised. For nonfinancial corporations, measures of productivity and output are also subject to an additional quarter of revisions.

Business

From the second quarter to the third quarter of 2002, business sector productivity increased at a 4.3 percent annual rate. Output increased 4.1 percent, while hours of all persons engaged in the sector declined 0.1 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). After revisions, second-quarter productivity in the business sector rose 1.8 percent, reflecting a 0.6- percent rise in output and a 1.2-percent decline in hours (tables B and 1).

Hourly compensation increased at an annual rate of 5.2 percent during the third quarter of 2002. Revised results show that hourly compensation increased 4.2 percent in the second quarter and 3.0 percent in the first quarter of 2002 (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 3.2 percent in the third quarter of 2002.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 0.9-percent annual rate during the third quarter. These costs had increased 2.4 percent in the second quarter, following a decrease of 4.9 percent in the first quarter of 2002 (as revised). The implicit price deflator for the business sector increased 0.6 percent during the third quarter of 2002, about the same as the 0.7 percent increase in the previous quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector grew at a 4.0-percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2002. This increase in output per hour occurred as output increased 4.1 percent and hours of all persons edged up 0.1 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The small rise in hours reflects a 0.6-percent increase in employment combined with a 0.5-percent decline in average weekly hours at work. Nonfarm business productivity rose 1.7 percent in the second quarter of 2002, as output rose 0.9 percent and hours decreased 0.7 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased at a 4.8 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2002. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose at a 2.9-percent annual rate during the July- September period. During the second quarter of 2002, real hourly compensation had risen 0.5 percent.

Unit labor costs increased 0.8 percent during the third quarter of 2002. In the second quarter, unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector had increased 2.2 percent. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 0.2 percent in the third quarter of 2002.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 5.9 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2002, as output grew 3.4 percent and hours of all persons fell 2.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). A 4.2 percent increase in labor productivity was recorded in the previous quarter, reflecting a 3.5-percent increase in output and a 0.7-percent decline in hours. Total manufacturing output has increased in each of the last three quarters, after having fallen in each of the six previous quarters. In durable goods, productivity grew 8.8 percent in the third quarter as output increased 4.5 percent and hours of all persons fell 4.0 percent. Productivity increased 2.0 percent in nondurable goods, as output rose 2.1 percent and hours of all persons increased 0.1 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased an average of 4.5 percent during the third quarter, the largest increase in this series since the third quarter of 2000, when it grew 9.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Hourly compensation grew 4.4 percent in durable goods and 5.0 percent in nondurable goods in the third quarter of 2002. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation in total manufacturing rose 2.6 percent in the third quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing decreased 1.3 percent in the third quarter of 2002. This was the fifth consecutive quarterly decline in these costs. In the durable goods sector, unit labor costs in the third quarter fell 4.1 percent. Unit labor costs rose 2.9 percent in the nondurable goods sector.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the first and second quarters of 2002 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, growth in output and productivity is slightly higher in the second quarter than reported on Sept. 5, based on information then available. In the first quarter of 2002, growth in hourly compensation in all of these sectors was revised down substantially, which resulted in larger declines in unit labor costs.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for nonfinancial corporations for the first and second quarters of 2002 also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on Sept. 5.

Productivity and output in this sector were revised up for the second quarter of 2002. Productivity grew at an annual rate of 5.9 percent, compared with the increase of 5.0 percent published Sept. 5. Hourly compensation was revised up much less than output per hour, so unit labor costs fell more, 1.3 percent, than the 0.8-percent decline reported at that time. Unit profits rose 0.9 percent in the second quarter of 2002 compared with the preliminary estimate of a 3.7- percent drop. Nonfinancial corporate output, productivity, and hourly compensation grew less during the first quarter of 2002 than reported Sept. 5. Because hourly compensation was revised down more than productivity, unit labor costs were revised down as well (tables C and 6).

Second quarter 2002

First quarter 2002

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 7, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 8, 2002Publication referenceNov 7, 200230 days laterDec 7, 2002
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.01%Observed 6.13%Observed +12 bps vs. earlier reference6.19%Observed +6 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 7, 2002 – Feb 7, 2003
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 7, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.00%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Aug 9, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 16, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.27% · Aug 23, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 30, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Sep 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Sep 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Sep 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.99% · Sep 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Oct 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Oct 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Nov 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Nov 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Nov 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 29, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.19% · Dec 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.04% · Dec 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Dec 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.93% · Dec 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Jan 3, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.95% · Jan 10, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.97% · Jan 17, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Jan 24, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.90% · Jan 31, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.88% · Feb 7, 2003Aug 7, 2002Nov 7, 2002Feb 7, 2003
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,823.80/month

6.13% · Nov 1, 2002

At the later reference$1,835.46/month

6.19% · Dec 6, 2002

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $11.66 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →