Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2002 Second Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons-- for the second quarter of 2002. The preliminary seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2002

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons-- for the second quarter of 2002. The preliminary seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the second quarter were:

1.4 percent in the business sector and 1.1 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In the business sector, productivity grew as hours dropped 1.1 percent and output edged up 0.3 percent. A similar pattern occurred in nonfarm businesses, where hours fell 0.7 percent as output grew 0.5 percent.

In manufacturing, the preliminary productivity changes in the second quarter were: 4.9 percent in manufacturing, 7.0 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 2.9 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Manufacturing productivity grew 4.9 percent in the second quarter, compared with a 9.7-percent rise (as revised) in the first quarter. Output rose 4.1 percent in the second quarter of 2002 and hours of all persons fell 0.8 percent. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 16 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Second-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data in this release reflect the regular multi-year GDP revisions released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce on July 31. They also reflect the annual benchmark revision to the BLS establishment survey data and revisions to hours series released by BLS on June 7. All employment and hours series incorporate new information on seasonal patterns. See Revised Measures. Appendix tables 1-6 show revised historical series.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the first quarter to the second quarter of 2002, business sector output per hour increased at a 1.4-percent annual rate. Output rose 0.3 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector fell 1.1 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). As revised, labor productivity grew 8.3 percent in the first quarter of 2002, when output increased 5.9 percent and hours decreased 2.2 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 3.9 percent in the second quarter and 3.8 percent in the first quarter of 2002 (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This measure includes wages and salaries; vacation and other paid leave; bonuses, stock options, and other supplements; employer contributions to employee benefit plans; and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, rose at a 0.5-percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2002, after rising 2.3 percent during the previous quarter.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased 2.4 percent during the second quarter of 2002. These costs had fallen 4.2 percent in the first quarter. The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased 0.6 percent in the second quarter and 0.3 percent in the first quarter of 2002.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 1.1 percent in the nonfarm business sector during the second quarter of 2002, as output edged up 0.5 percent and hours of all persons declined 0.7 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Output per hour grew at an 8.6 percent annual rate in the first quarter of 2002, as output increased 6.2 percent and hours decreased 2.2 percent (table 2). The first-quarter productivity gain was the largest in this sector since the second quarter of 1983, when output per hour increased 9.9 percent.

Hourly compensation in the nonfarm business sector increased 3.6 percent in both the first and second quarters of 2002. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation for the second quarter of 2002 rose 0.2 percent.

Unit labor costs increased 2.4 percent in the second quarter of 2002, after falling 4.6 percent during the first quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output grew 1.4 percent in the second quarter and declined 0.2 percent in the first quarter of 2002.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 4.9 percent in manufacturing, as output grew 4.1 percent and hours of all persons declined 0.8 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the previous quarter, productivity rose 9.7 percent, reflecting an increase of 3.0 percent in output and a drop of 6.1 percent in hours. Growth in second-quarter productivity differed in the durable and nondurable goods sectors. In durable goods, productivity rose 7.0 percent as output rose 6.1 percent and hours of all persons fell 0.8 percent. The drop in hours reflected an employment decline of 1.8 percent and a rise of 1.0 percent in average weekly hours at work. In nondurable goods, second- quarter productivity increased by 2.9 as output grew 1.9 percent and hours declined 0.9 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 3.0 percent during the second quarter, reflecting growth of 2.8 percent in durable goods and 3.5 percent in nondurable goods. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, the real hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers declined 0.4 percent in the second quarter, after rising 5.4 percent in the first quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing dropped 1.8 percent in the second quarter, marking the fourth consecutive decline in the series. Reflecting the differing growth rates in productivity and hourly compensation in the second quarter, unit labor costs grew dissimilarly in the two manufacturing sectors. Unit labor costs fell 3.9 percent in durable goods manufacturing and rose 0.6 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing. The change in unit labor costs is roughly equal to the change in hourly compensation less the change in productivity.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the first quarter of 2002 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity, output, and hours movements were similar to those reported on May 31. Hourly compensation grew more, and unit labor costs fell less, than reported on May 31, based on information then available. In manufacturing, productivity growth was slightly higher, primarily as a result of a downward revision to hours. Unit labor costs fell considerably less than originally reported, reflecting a sharp upward revision to hourly compensation.

Current and previous changes in the annual measures for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. Output data for the business and nonfarm business sectors and the compensation series for all sectors incorporate the revisions of the national income and product accounts produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. Labor input measures have been revised to reflect the annual benchmarking of employment levels derived from the monthly Current Employment Statistics (CES) program that occurred on June 7. Updated seasonal adjustment factors also have been incorporated into the labor input measures beginning in 1997. Appendix tables 1-6 present quarterly and annual measures for all sectors for 1997-99.

Revised measures of real output for the manufacturing, durable manufacturing, and nondurable manufacturing sectors are now available. These measures incorporate the results of the 2000 Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM). Manufacturing output data for earlier years reflect a number of revisions to data from the ASM and other series, including industry price indexes. In addition, methods used to estimate the intra-sector flows of output have been improved. Updated measures of multifactor productivity for manufacturing industries through 2000 will be available later.

In the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity was revised down in both 2000 and 2001. Both output and hours of all persons were revised downward, with the revisions in output being larger than those in hours. In 2000, upward revisions in compensation, combined with the lower productivity, resulted in higher unit labor costs in both sectors than before the revisions. In 2001, however, unit labor costs in the business and nonfarm business sectors were revised down, as the lower productivity rates were more than offset by sharp downward revisions to hourly compensation.

In manufacturing, output and productivity were revised down in 1998, 2000, and 2001. As a result, unit labor costs were revised up in 1998 and 2000, but, in 2001, sharply lower estimates of hourly compensation more than offset the small downward revision to productivity and unit labor costs were lower than previously reported. Output and productivity were revised up for 1999, resulting in a downward revision in unit labor costs.

The downward revisions to productivity in 2000 and 2001 lowered the 1990- 2001 average annual rate of growth in both the business and the nonfarm business sectors by 0.1 percentage point. For the business sector, productivity increased 2.0 percent a year over the past decade--substantially faster than the 1.5-percent growth rate for the 1973-90 period. In nonfarm businesses, productivity grew 1.9 percent a year between 1990 and 2001, up from 1.3 percent between 1973 and 1990. In manufacturing, the rate of growth between 1990 and 2001 was reduced by 0.2 percentage point, to 3.5 percent per year, up from the 2.5 percent annual rate of growth in the 1973-90 period.

Effective with the release of preliminary third-quarter 2002 data on Nov. 7, BLS will begin to issue revised measures for hourly compensation and unit labor costs for the previous two quarters. This revision practice will be followed whenever preliminary quarterly estimates are first announced. This change is in accordance with the announcement by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of their new revision schedule for wage and salary data. See "National Income and Product Accounts" (BEA 02-23), released July 31.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for the first quarter for nonfinancial corporations also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on May 31. Productivity was revised down, reflecting the downward revision to output. Unit labor costs showed less of a decline than originally reported, reflecting the lower productivity growth and an upward revision to hourly compensation. Unit profits were revised down to show a slight decline; they had originally showed an increase (table D).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 9, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 10, 2002Publication referenceAug 9, 200230 days laterSep 8, 2002
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.57%Observed 6.31%Observed −26 bps vs. earlier reference6.15%Observed −16 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 9, 2002 – Nov 9, 2002
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 9, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.25%7.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.79% · May 10, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · May 17, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.81% · May 24, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.76% · May 31, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 7, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 14, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Jun 21, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.55% · Jun 28, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.57% · Jul 5, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.54% · Jul 12, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.49% · Jul 19, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Jul 26, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.43% · Aug 2, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Aug 9, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 16, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.27% · Aug 23, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 30, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Sep 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Sep 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Sep 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.99% · Sep 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Oct 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Oct 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Nov 8, 2002May 9, 2002Aug 9, 2002Nov 9, 2002
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,858.87/month

6.31% · Aug 9, 2002

At the later reference$1,827.68/month

6.15% · Sep 6, 2002

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $31.19 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →