Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2002 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 2002. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2002

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 2002. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the second quarter were:

1.7 percent in the business sector and 1.5 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, increases in productivity were larger than reported on Aug. 9, due primarily to upward revisions to output. (See table C.)

In manufacturing, the revised productivity changes in the second quarter were:

4.3 percent in manufacturing, 6.0 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 2.6 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

In total manufacturing, the change in productivity was revised to show an increase of 4.3 percent in the second quarter, compared with the preliminary estimate of 4.9 percent. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 16 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Second-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5; the differences between these measures and the preliminary second-quarter figures issued on Aug. 9 are shown in table C.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the first to the second quarter of 2002, business sector productivity rose at a 1.7 percent annual rate, as output increased 0.5 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector decreased 1.2 percent (tables A and 1). In the first quarter of 2002, productivity had increased 8.3 percent when output increased 5.9 percent and hours fell 2.2 percent.

A 4.0-percent rise in hourly compensation in the second quarter of 2002 was similar to the 3.8-percent increase one quarter earlier (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Hourly compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 0.5 percent in the second quarter of 2002, after rising 2.3 percent in the first quarter.

Changes in unit labor costs reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity. Unit labor costs increased 2.3 percent in the second quarter of 2002, after falling 4.2 percent in the first quarter (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The implicit price deflator for the business sector rose 0.5 percent in the second quarter, as the increase in unit labor costs was partially offset by a 2.2 percent drop in unit nonlabor payments.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector increased 1.5 percent during the second quarter of 2002, as output rose 0.8 percent and hours of all persons declined 0.7 percent (table A). In the first quarter of 2002, output per hour in the nonfarm business sector had increased 8.6 percent, as output grew 6.2 percent and hours fell 2.2 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation grew at a 3.7 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2002, following a 3.6 percent increase in the first quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 0.2 percent in the second quarter of 2002.

Unit labor costs increased 2.1 percent in the second quarter of 2002. This measure had decreased 4.6 percent in the first quarter. Unit nonlabor payments edged down 0.1 percent in the second quarter of 2002, and the implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.3 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates).

Manufacturing

In the second quarter of 2002, productivity increased 4.3 percent in manufacturing, as output increased 3.6 percent and hours of all persons declined 0.7 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Hours worked in manufacturing had the smallest decline since the second quarter of 2000, when they increased 0.5 percent. In the durable goods sector, productivity grew 6.0 percent in the second quarter of 2002, as output grew 5.4 percent and hours declined 0.6 percent. In nondurable goods, output per hour rose 2.6 percent as output increased 1.8 percent and hours decreased 0.8 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

The hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 3.0 percent during the second quarter of 2002, reflecting a 2.8-percent rise in hourly compensation in durable goods industries and a 3.4-percent increase in the nondurable goods sector. Real hourly compensation in the total manufacturing sector declined 0.4 percent in the second quarter, after increasing 5.4 percent one quarter earlier.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 1.2 percent in the second quarter of 2002. This was the fourth consecutive quarterly decline in the series. Unit labor costs decreased 3.1 percent in durable goods and increased 0.8 percent in nondurable goods in the second quarter of 2002.

Nonfinancial corporations

Preliminary second-quarter 2002 measures of productivity and costs also were announced today for nonfinancial corporations (tables B and 6). Productivity increased 5.0 percent during the second quarter, as output rose 4.4 percent and hours fell 0.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The second-quarter drop in hours was the smallest since a decline of 0.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2000. Nonfinancial corporations include all corporations doing business in the United States except those classified as depository institutions, nondepository institutions, security and commodity brokers, insurance carriers, regulated investment offices, small business investment offices, and real estate investment trusts.

Hourly compensation rose 4.2 percent in the second quarter of 2002, following a 4.1 percent increase in the first quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 0.8 percent in the second quarter and 2.6 percent in the first quarter of 2002 (table 6).

Unit labor costs for nonfinancial corporations decreased 0.8 percent in the second quarter of 2002, similar to the 0.9-percent decline in the first quarter of the year. Unit profits fell 3.7 percent in the second quarter of 2002, after falling 0.6 percent in the first quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfinancial corporate output edged down 0.4 percent in the second quarter of 2002.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the second quarter of 2002 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. The quarterly movements differ from those reported on Aug. 9 based on information then available. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, output and productivity were revised up, and unit labor costs were revised down. In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised down, as output grew less rapidly than originally reported. Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell less than reported on Aug. 9.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 5, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 6, 2002Publication referenceSep 5, 200230 days laterOct 5, 2002
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.43%Observed 6.22%Observed −21 bps vs. earlier reference6.01%Observed −21 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 5, 2002 – Dec 5, 2002
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 5, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.25%7.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 7, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 14, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Jun 21, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.55% · Jun 28, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.57% · Jul 5, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.54% · Jul 12, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.49% · Jul 19, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Jul 26, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.43% · Aug 2, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Aug 9, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 16, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.27% · Aug 23, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 30, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Sep 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Sep 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Sep 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.99% · Sep 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Oct 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Oct 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Nov 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Nov 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Nov 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 29, 2002Jun 5, 2002Sep 5, 2002Dec 5, 2002
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,841.30/month

6.22% · Aug 30, 2002

At the later reference$1,800.58/month

6.01% · Oct 4, 2002

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $40.72 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →