Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2002 Third Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2002. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2002

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2002. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

5.4 percent in the business sector, and 5.1 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, upward revisions to productivity were primarily due to increases in output larger than originally reported.

In manufacturing, revised productivity increases in the third quarter were: 5.5 percent in manufacturing, 8.8 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 1.3 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Manufacturing productivity rose less than reported on November 7. This reflects both a small downward revision to output and a small upward revision to hours. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 16 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From second quarter to third quarter of 2002, business sector productivity rose at an annual rate of 5.4 percent, as output increased 5.2 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector dropped 0.2 percent (table 1). The decline in hours reflects an underlying increase in employment (0.4 percent) and a decline in average weekly hours (-0.6 percent). Average weekly hours worked by all persons in the sector also declined in the second quarter of 2002, by 0.3 percent, and dropped in ten of the last eleven quarters.

Hourly compensation increased 5.3 percent during the third quarter of 2002, up from the 4.2-percent rise in the previous quarter. Hourly compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, rose 3.4 percent in the third quarter of 2002.

Unit labor costs edged down 0.1 percent last quarter and have fallen in four of the last five quarters. The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes both in unit labor costs and in unit nonlabor payments, increased at a 0.4 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2002, somewhat less than the 0.7-percent increase in the second quarter of 2002.

Nonfarm business

Output per hour of all persons in the nonfarm business sector increased 5.1 percent during the third quarter of 2002 (table 2). Output rose 5.1 percent while hours of all persons were unchanged. As in the larger business sector, employment rose (0.6 percent) while average weekly hours fell (0.6 percent). The third quarter productivity increase was higher than the 1.7- percent rise in the second quarter but lower than the increase registered in the first quarter of the year, 8.6 percent.

Hourly compensation grew at a 4.9 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2002, up from the 3.9 percent increase in the previous quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose at a 3.0 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2002.

Unit labor costs fell 0.2 percent in the third quarter, following a 2.2 percent increase one quarter earlier. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business rose 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2002.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 5.5 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2002, as output increased 3.2 percent and hours of all persons fell 2.2 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In durable goods industries, productivity grew 8.8 percent as output rose 4.9 percent and hours dropped 3.5 percent. Productivity grew much more slowly in the nondurable goods industries, 1.3 percent, reflecting an output increase of 1.2 percent and a slight decline in hours, 0.1 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers rose 4.4 percent during the third quarter of 2002. In durable goods manufacturing, hourly compensation rose 4.3 percent during the third quarter. The increase in nondurable goods manufacturing was 4.9 percent. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation for all manufacturing workers rose 2.5 percent in the third quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 1.0 percent in the third quarter, continuing a series of quarterly declines in these costs that began in the third quarter of 2001. Unit labor costs dropped 4.2 percent in durable goods manufacturing and rose 3.5 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Nonfinancial Corporations

Third-quarter 2002 measures of productivity and costs also were released for nonfinancial corporations (tables B and 6). Output per all-employee hour grew at a 5.7 percent annual rate, similar to the 5.8 percent increase in the previous quarter. Output increased 4.3 percent in the third quarter, and hours of all employees fell 1.3 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This decrease in employee hours is the eighth consecutive drop in this sector. The nonfinancial corporate sector includes all corporations doing business in the United States, except those classified as depository institutions, nondepository institutions, security and commodity brokers, insurance carriers, regulated investment offices, small business investment offices, and real estate investment trusts.

Hourly compensation in nonfinancial corporations increased 5.7 percent in the third quarter, more rapidly than in the second quarter when it rose 4.4 percent. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 3.7 percent in the third quarter and 1.0 percent in the second quarter.

Unit labor costs for the sector were unchanged in the third quarter. Unit nonlabor costs rose 1.1 percent and unit profits fell 10.4 percent in the third quarter of 2002. As a result of these movements, the implicit price deflator for the output of nonfinancial corporations--which reflects a weighted average of these three measures--dropped 0.6 percent. The implicit price deflator also fell in the previous three quarters.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the third quarter of 2002 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, increases in productivity and output are larger than those reported on Nov. 7, based on the information available at that time. Unit labor cost measures for these sectors are correspondingly lower and now show small declines. In manufacturing, rates of growth in output and productivity were revised down in the third quarter. Unit labor costs were revised up due to the downward output revision but still show a decline in the quarter.

On Nov. 26, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, revised the price indexes used to calculate real output of nonfinancial corporations back to the first quarter of 1999. The appendix table shows revised 1999 measures for output, productivity, and unit costs.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Dec 4, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierNov 4, 2002Publication referenceDec 4, 200230 days laterJan 3, 2003
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.13%Observed 6.13%Observed Unchanged vs. earlier reference5.85%Observed −28 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Sep 4, 2002 – Mar 4, 2003
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Dec 4, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.00%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Sep 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Sep 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Sep 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.99% · Sep 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Oct 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Oct 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Nov 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Nov 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Nov 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 29, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.19% · Dec 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.04% · Dec 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Dec 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.93% · Dec 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Jan 3, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.95% · Jan 10, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.97% · Jan 17, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Jan 24, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.90% · Jan 31, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.88% · Feb 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.86% · Feb 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.84% · Feb 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Feb 28, 2003Sep 4, 2002Dec 4, 2002Mar 4, 2003
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,823.80/month

6.13% · Nov 29, 2002

At the later reference$1,769.82/month

5.85% · Jan 3, 2003

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $53.98 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →