Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 2012 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 0.1 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods moved down 1.0 percent in May and declined 0.2 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 0.1 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods moved down 1.0 percent in May and declined 0.2 percent in April. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods decreased 0.5 percent in June, and the crude goods index fell 3.6 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods advanced 0.7 percent for the 12 months ended in June, the same rate as in May. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In June, the increase in finished goods prices was led by the index for finished goods less foods and energy, which moved up 0.2 percent. Prices for finished consumer foods rose 0.5 percent. By contrast, the index for finished energy goods declined 0.9 percent.

Finished core: In June, prices for finished goods less foods and energy advanced 0.2 percent for the fourth consecutive month. Accounting for seventy percent of the June increase, the index for light motor trucks moved up 1.4 percent. Higher prices for major household appliances and pet food also contributed to the rise in the finished core index. (See table 2.)

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods moved up 0.5 percent in June, the largest advance since a 1.0-percent rise in November 2011. Over ninety percent of the June increase can be traced to prices for meats, which moved up 3.1 percent. An advance in the index for fresh and dry vegetables also was a factor in the rise in finished foods prices.

Finished energy: In June, prices for finished energy goods fell 0.9 percent, the fourth straight decline. The residential electric power index was a significant factor in the June decrease, dropping 2.1 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components fell 0.5 percent in June, the third consecutive decline. Most of the June decrease can be attributed to a 0.7-percent drop in prices for intermediate goods less foods and energy. The index for intermediate energy goods moved down 0.2 percent. By contrast, prices for intermediate foods and feeds advanced 1.0 percent. For the 12 months ended in June, the intermediate goods index fell 1.3 percent, the largest decrease since a 1.8-percent decline for the 12 months ended November 2009. (See table B.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy fell 0.7 percent in June, the largest decline since a 0.7-percent decrease in February 2009. Over sixty percent of the June decline can be traced to the index for industrial chemicals, which fell 3.6 percent. Lower prices for plastic resins and materials and for steel mill products also were factors in the decrease in the intermediate core index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods moved down 0.2 percent in June, the third consecutive decrease. Most of the June decline can be attributed to an 8.8-percent drop in the index for diesel fuel. Lower prices for lubricating oil base stocks also contributed to the decrease in the intermediate energy goods index.

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds climbed 1.0 percent in June, the largest advance since a 1.4-percent increase in August 2011. More than half of the June rise can be traced to a 2.2-percent advance in prices for prepared animal feeds.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing fell 3.6 percent in June. For the 3 months ended in June, prices for crude materials dropped 10.8 percent after moving down 0.9 percent from December to March. In June, over half of the broad-based monthly decline can be traced to a 5.1- percent decrease in the index for crude energy materials. Prices for crude nonfood materials less energy and for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs also fell in June - 4.0 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively. (See table B.)

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials moved down 5.1 percent in June. From March to June, prices for crude energy materials dropped 16.0 percent, compared with an 8.5- percent decrease for the 3 months ended in March. Most of the monthly decline in June is attributable to the crude petroleum index, which fell 11.7 percent. Lower prices for coal also were a factor in the decrease in the crude energy index. (See table 2.)

Crude core: Prices for crude nonfood materials less energy declined 4.0 percent in June. For the 3 months ended in June, the index for crude nonfood materials less energy fell 7.0 percent following a 2.5-percent increase from December to March. Over eighty percent of the monthly decrease in June can be traced to a 12.8-percent drop in the index for carbon steel scrap. Lower prices for raw cotton also contributed to the decline in crude core prices.

Crude food: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs decreased 1.6 percent in June. From March to June, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs fell 7.2 percent, compared with a 5.1- percent rise for the 3 months ended in March. About half of the monthly decline in June is attributable to the index for slaughter poultry, which moved down 6.1 percent. Lower prices for slaughter cattle also were a major factor in the decrease in the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries was unchanged in June following five consecutive increases. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) In June, higher margins received by warehouse clubs and supercenters and by electronic shopping and mail-order houses were offset by lower margins received by family clothing stores and gasoline stations with convenience stores.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries moved down 0.2 percent in June, the first decrease since a 0.5-percent drop in September 2011. Accounting for a majority of the June decline, prices received by the truck transportation sector fell 1.1 percent. Lower prices received by the industry groups for air transportation support activities and nonscheduled air transportation also contributed to the decrease in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries edged up 0.1 percent in June after declining 0.2 percent in May. Leading the June increase, the index for the commercial banking industry rose 1.3 percent. Higher prices received by lessors of nonresidential buildings and by the accommodation sector also were factors in the advance in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 13, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 13, 2012Publication referenceJul 13, 201230 days laterAug 12, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.67%Observed 3.56%Observed −11 bps vs. earlier reference3.59%Observed +3 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 13, 2012 – Oct 13, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 13, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.50%4.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Apr 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.84% · May 3, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.83% · May 10, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.79% · May 17, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.78% · May 24, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.75% · May 31, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.67% · Jun 7, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.71% · Jun 14, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 28, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Jul 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Jul 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jul 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Jul 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Aug 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Aug 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Aug 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 30, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 13, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Sep 20, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Sep 27, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.36% · Oct 4, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Oct 11, 2012Apr 13, 2012Jul 13, 2012Oct 13, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,357.20/month

3.56% · Jul 12, 2012

At the later reference$1,362.25/month

3.59% · Aug 9, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $5.05 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →