Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

August 2012 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods rose 1.7 percent in August, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This increase followed advances of 0.3 percent in July and 0.1 percent in June, and marks…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods rose 1.7 percent in August, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This increase followed advances of 0.3 percent in July and 0.1 percent in June, and marks the largest monthly rise since a 1.9-percent increase in June 2009. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods moved up 1.1 percent in August, and the crude goods index rose 5.8 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods climbed 2.0 percent for the 12 months ended August 2012, the largest advance since a 2.8-percent increase for the 12 months ended March 2012. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In August, over eighty percent of the broad-based rise in finished goods prices is attributable to the index for finished energy goods, which jumped 6.4 percent. Also contributing to the increase in finished goods prices, the index for finished consumer foods climbed 0.9 percent, and prices for finished goods less foods and energy advanced 0.2 percent.

Finished energy: The index for finished energy goods moved up 6.4 percent in August, the largest advance since a 6.7-percent jump in August 2009. Most of the rise in August 2012 can be traced to a 13.6-percent surge in gasoline prices. The indexes for home heating oil and liquefied petroleum gas also were factors in the advance in prices for finished energy goods. (See table 2.)

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods climbed 0.9 percent in August, the largest rise since a 1.0-percent increase in November 2011. About one-third of the August advance is attributable to prices for dairy products, which jumped 3.0 percent. Higher prices for eggs for fresh use also were a major factor in the rise in the finished consumer foods index.

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent in August after increasing 0.4 percent in July. Over thirty percent of the August rise can be traced to a 0.5-percent advance in prices for pharmaceutical preparations.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components moved up 1.1 percent in August following four consecutive declines. Most of this increase can be attributed to higher prices for intermediate energy goods, which climbed 4.4 percent. The index for intermediate foods and feeds rose 2.4 percent. By contrast, prices for intermediate materials less foods and energy moved down 0.2 percent. On a 12-month basis, the index for intermediate goods declined 1.1 percent, the fourth straight month of year-over-year decreases. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: The index for intermediate energy goods moved up 4.4 percent in August after four straight declines. A major factor in this increase was a 4.9-percent rise in the diesel fuel index. Higher prices for gasoline and jet fuel also contributed significantly to the advance in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate foods: Prices for intermediate foods and feeds rose 2.4 percent in August, the third consecutive increase. About three-quarters of the August advance can be traced to the index for prepared animal feeds, which moved up 6.6 percent. An increase in prices for processed eggs also contributed to the rise in the intermediate foods index.

Intermediate core: Prices for intermediate goods less foods and energy edged down 0.2 percent in August, the fourth straight decline. Nearly half of the August decrease can be attributed to the index for hot rolled steel sheet and strip, which fell 8.3 percent.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing jumped 5.8 percent in August. For the 3-month period ended in August, prices for crude materials advanced 3.8 percent after dropping 10.0 percent from February to May. In August, the monthly increase in the crude goods index was broad based and led by prices for crude energy materials, which surged 9.7 percent. The indexes for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs and for crude nonfood materials less energy rose 4.6 percent and 2.2 percent, respectively. (See table B.)

Crude energy: Prices for crude energy materials increased 9.7 percent in August. From May to August the index for crude energy goods moved up 4.7 percent subsequent to a 19.9-percent drop for the 3 months ended in May. The monthly advance in August was mostly attributable to crude petroleum prices, which rose 12.8 percent. The indexes for natural gas and coal also contributed to higher crude energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved up 4.6 percent in August. For the 3 months ended in August, prices for crude foods jumped 8.3 percent compared with a 3.0-percent decline from February to May. Forty percent of the monthly advance in the crude foods index can be traced to prices for grains, which rose 6.1 percent. Higher prices for slaughter steers and heifers also contributed to the increase in the crude foods index.

Crude core: Prices for crude nonfood materials less energy advanced 2.2 percent in August. From May to August the crude core index decreased 3.0 percent following a 2.6-percent decline in the prior 3-month period. In August, a 9.6-percent rise in prices for carbon steel scrap accounted for most of the monthly increase in the crude core index.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries declined 1.3 percent in August, the largest decrease since a 1.4-percent drop in June 2010. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading the August decline, margins received by merchant wholesalers of durable goods moved down 1.7 percent. Lower margins received by gasoline stations and department stores also contributed to the decrease in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries moved up 0.4 percent in August following a 0.4- percent decline in July. Over half of this advance can be attributed to a 1.3-percent rise in prices received by the scheduled passenger air transportation industry. Higher prices received by the truck transportation industry group and by the general warehousing and storage industry also were factors in the increase in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries advanced 0.6 percent in August after no change in the prior month. Leading this rise, prices received by the industry group for hospitals climbed 1.6 percent. Higher prices received by the industry groups for depository credit intermediation and for securities, commodity contracts, and related financial investment services also contributed to the increase in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 13, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 14, 2012Publication referenceSep 13, 201230 days laterOct 13, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.59%Observed 3.55%Observed −4 bps vs. earlier reference3.39%Observed −16 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 13, 2012 – Dec 13, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 13, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.50%4.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.71% · Jun 14, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 28, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Jul 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Jul 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jul 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Jul 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Aug 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Aug 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Aug 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 30, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 13, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Sep 20, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Sep 27, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.36% · Oct 4, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Oct 11, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.37% · Oct 18, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.41% · Oct 25, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Nov 1, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Nov 8, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.34% · Nov 15, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.31% · Nov 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.32% · Nov 29, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.34% · Dec 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.32% · Dec 13, 2012Jun 13, 2012Sep 13, 2012Dec 13, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,355.52/month

3.55% · Sep 13, 2012

At the later reference$1,328.78/month

3.39% · Oct 11, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $26.74 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →