Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

September 2012 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods rose 1.1 percent in September, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods advanced 1.7 percent in August and moved up 0.3 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods rose 1.1 percent in September, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods advanced 1.7 percent in August and moved up 0.3 percent in July. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods rose 1.5 percent in September, and the crude goods index advanced 2.8 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods climbed 2.1 percent for the 12 months ended September 2012, the largest rise since a 2.8-percent increase for the 12 months ended March 2012. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In September, the rise in finished goods prices was led by the index for finished energy goods, which advanced 4.7 percent. Also contributing to higher finished goods prices, the index for finished consumer foods moved up 0.2 percent. Prices for finished goods less foods and energy were unchanged in September.

Finished energy: Prices for finished energy goods advanced 4.7 percent in September after rising 6.4 percent in August. A 9.8-percent jump in the gasoline index accounted for over eighty percent of the September increase. Advances in the indexes for diesel fuel and residential natural gas also contributed to the rise in finished energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods moved up 0.2 percent in September, the fourth consecutive increase. Leading the September advance, prices for dairy products climbed 2.8 percent. Higher prices for fresh fruits and melons also were a major factor in the increase in the finished consumer foods index.

Finished core: Prices for finished goods less foods and energy were unchanged in September after rising 0.2 percent a month earlier. Higher prices for light motor trucks were offset by declining prices for communication and related equipment.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components moved up 1.5 percent in September, the largest advance since a 1.7-percent jump in February 2011. Leading the broad-based rise in September, prices for intermediate energy goods increased 4.3 percent. Also contributing to this advance, the index for intermediate goods less foods and energy rose 0.6 percent, and prices for intermediate foods and feeds climbed 2.0 percent. For the 12 months ended in September, the index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components edged down 0.1 percent, the fifth consecutive 12-month decline. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: The index for intermediate energy goods increased 4.3 percent in September following a 4.4-percent advance in August. A 9.2-percent jump in diesel fuel prices was a major contributor to the September rise. Higher prices for gasoline and jet fuel also were significant factors in the increase in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: Prices for intermediate goods less foods and energy moved up 0.6 percent in September following four straight declines. Over half of this advance is attributable to the index for basic organic chemicals, which climbed 3.0 percent. An increase in prices for primary nonferrous metals also was a factor in the rise in the index for intermediate goods less foods and energy.

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds advanced 2.0 percent in September, the seventh consecutive increase. Over three-fourths of the September rise can be traced to a 5.1-percent jump in prices for prepared animal feeds.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing moved up 2.8 percent in September. For the 3-month period ended in September, prices for crude materials advanced 10.7 percent following a 10.8-percent decrease from March to June. In September, the monthly increase in the crude goods index was broad based and led by prices for crude energy materials, which rose 4.4 percent. The indexes for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs and for crude nonfood materials less energy both advanced 1.6 percent. (See table B.)

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials increased 4.4 percent in September. From June to September, prices for crude energy materials moved up 15.2 percent subsequent to a 16.5-percent decrease for the 3 months ended in June. The monthly advance in September was led by an 11.4-percent jump in the crude petroleum index. Higher prices for coal also were a factor in the rise in the crude energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved up 1.6 percent in September. From June to September, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs climbed 11.8 percent following a 7.0-percent decrease for the 3-month period ended in June. Nearly sixty percent of the September monthly increase can be traced to a 6.8-percent rise in prices for hay, hayseeds, and oilseeds. An advance in the index for slaughter steers and heifers also contributed to higher crude foods prices.

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy rose 1.6 percent in September. For the 3 months ended in September, crude core prices advanced 2.6 percent after falling 6.9 percent from March to June. In September, nearly eighty-five percent of the monthly increase is attributable to the nonferrous metals index, which rose 2.5 percent. Higher prices for construction sand, gravel, and crushed stone also contributed to the advance in the crude core index.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries rose 0.9 percent in September following a 1.3-percent drop in August. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading this increase, margins received by wholesale trade industries moved up 1.6 percent. Higher margins received by grocery stores and by electronic shopping and mail-order houses also contributed to the advance in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries declined 1.0 percent in September following a 0.4- percent rise in August. This decrease can be mostly attributed to prices received by the scheduled passenger air transportation industry, which fell 7.3 percent. The indexes for deep sea freight transportation and nonscheduled air passenger chartering also were factors in the decline in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries decreased 0.2 percent in September after a 0.6-percent advance in August. Prices received by general medical and surgical hospitals, which moved down 1.1 percent, accounted for about seventy percent of this decline. Lower prices received by the industries for investment banking and securities dealing and for commercial banking also contributed to the decrease in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Oct 12, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierSep 12, 2012Publication referenceOct 12, 201230 days laterNov 11, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.55%Observed 3.39%Observed −16 bps vs. earlier reference3.40%Observed +1 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jul 12, 2012 – Jan 12, 2013
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Oct 12, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.50%4.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Jul 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jul 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Jul 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Aug 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Aug 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Aug 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 30, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 13, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Sep 20, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Sep 27, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.36% · Oct 4, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Oct 11, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.37% · Oct 18, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.41% · Oct 25, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.39% · Nov 1, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Nov 8, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.34% · Nov 15, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.31% · Nov 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.32% · Nov 29, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.34% · Dec 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.32% · Dec 13, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.37% · Dec 20, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.35% · Dec 27, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.34% · Jan 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Jan 10, 2013Jul 12, 2012Oct 12, 2012Jan 12, 2013
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,328.78/month

3.39% · Oct 11, 2012

At the later reference$1,330.44/month

3.40% · Nov 8, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $1.66 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →