Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

May 2012 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods fell 1.0 percent in May, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods moved down 0.2 percent in April and were unchanged in March. At the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods fell 1.0 percent in May, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods moved down 0.2 percent in April and were unchanged in March. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods decreased 0.8 percent in May, and the crude goods index fell 3.2 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods advanced 0.7 percent for the 12 months ended in May, the eighth straight month of slowing year-over-year increases following a 7.0-percent rise for the 12 months ended September 2011. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In May, the decrease in finished goods prices was led by the index for finished energy goods, which declined 4.3 percent. Prices for finished consumer foods fell 0.6 percent. By contrast, the index for finished goods less foods and energy advanced 0.2 percent.

Finished energy: The index for finished energy goods fell 4.3 percent in May, the largest decline since a 4.6-percent decrease in March 2009. An 8.9-percent drop in the gasoline index accounted for over eighty percent of the May decline. Lower prices for liquefied petroleum gas and residential natural gas also contributed to the decrease in the finished energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Finished foods: Prices for finished consumer foods moved down 0.6 percent in May, the largest decline since a 0.7-percent decrease in December 2011. Over sixty percent of the May decline can be traced to the meats index, which decreased 2.2 percent. Lower prices for fresh fruits and melons also were a factor in the decline in the finished consumer foods index.

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy advanced 0.2 percent in May, the third consecutive increase. Over a quarter of the May rise can be attributed to the pharmaceutical preparations index, which climbed 0.7 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components fell 0.8 percent in May, the largest decline since a 1.0-percent drop in October 2011. Most of the May decrease can be traced to a 3.3-percent decline in prices for intermediate energy goods. The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy moved down 0.2 percent in May, while prices for intermediate foods and feeds were unchanged. For the 12 months ended in May, the intermediate goods index fell 0.6 percent, the first decrease since a 1.8-percent decline for the 12 months ended November 2009. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods moved down 3.3 percent in May, the largest decrease since a 5.6-percent drop in March 2009. A major factor in the May decline was the jet fuel index, which fell 7.1 percent. Lower prices for gasoline and liquefied petroleum gas also contributed to the decrease in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy fell 0.2 percent in May, the first decline since a 0.6-percent decrease in December 2011. Most of the May decline can be attributed to a 2.1-percent drop in prices for basic organic chemicals. Falling prices for nonferrous wire and cable also contributed to the decrease in the index for intermediate goods less foods and energy.

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds was unchanged in May following two straight advances. In May, rising prices for prepared animal feeds and processed young chickens offset falling prices for meats and processed eggs.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing decreased 3.2 percent in May. For the 3-month period ending in May, crude materials prices fell 9.7 percent compared with a 1.0-percent increase from November to February. In May, roughly sixty percent of the broad-based monthly decline can be attributed to a 5.0-percent drop in the index for crude energy materials. Also contributing to the May decrease, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved down 2.3 percent and the index for crude nonfood materials less energy declined 1.3 percent. (See table B.)

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials moved down 5.0 percent in May. From February to May, prices for crude energy materials fell 19.6 percent subsequent to a 2.4-percent increase for the 3 months ended in February. The monthly decrease in May was led by a 7.6- percent drop in crude petroleum prices. A decrease in the index for natural gas also was a factor in lower prices for crude energy materials. (See table 2.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs declined 2.3 percent in May. From February to May, crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs prices fell 3.1 percent following a 0.7-percent decrease in the previous 3-month period. Over one-third of the monthly decline can be traced to a 4.1-percent decrease in the index for grains. Falling prices for hay, hayseeds, and oilseeds also contributed to the decline in the crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs index.

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy decreased 1.3 percent in May. For the 3-month period ending in May, crude core prices moved down 2.0 percent after advancing 0.8 percent from November to February. Over forty percent of the May monthly decline is attributable to prices for nonferrous metal ores, which fell 4.7 percent. A decrease in the iron and steel scrap index also was a significant factor in the crude core decline.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries increased 0.3 percent in May, the third consecutive advance. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) A 2.7-percent advance in margins received by merchant wholesalers of nondurable goods accounted for most of the May rise. Higher margins received by gasoline stations and new car dealers also contributed to the increase in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries was unchanged in May after seven consecutive advances. Higher prices received by the industries for line-haul railroads and freight transportation arrangement offset lower prices received by the industries for scheduled passenger air transportation and local specialized freight trucking of new goods.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries moved down 0.2 percent in May, following a 0.3-percent advance in April. The index for the depository credit intermediation group led this decline, falling 1.2 percent. Lower prices received by the investment banking and securities dealing industry and by the accommodation industry group also contributed to the decrease in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jun 13, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierMay 14, 2012Publication referenceJun 13, 201230 days laterJul 13, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.83%Observed 3.67%Observed −16 bps vs. earlier reference3.56%Observed −11 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Mar 13, 2012 – Sep 13, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jun 13, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.75%4.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.92% · Mar 15, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 4.08% · Mar 22, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Mar 29, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Apr 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Apr 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.84% · May 3, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.83% · May 10, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.79% · May 17, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.78% · May 24, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.75% · May 31, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.67% · Jun 7, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.71% · Jun 14, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 21, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Jun 28, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Jul 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Jul 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jul 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.49% · Jul 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Aug 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.62% · Aug 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.66% · Aug 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · Aug 30, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 6, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.55% · Sep 13, 2012Mar 13, 2012Jun 13, 2012Sep 13, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,375.76/month

3.67% · Jun 7, 2012

At the later reference$1,357.20/month

3.56% · Jul 12, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $18.56 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →