2019 Fourth Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.4 percent and hours worked increased 1.2 percent. (All quarterly…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics5 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages 2019, Revised
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.4 percent and hours worked increased 1.2 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the fourth quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2019, productivity increased 1.8 percent, reflecting a 2.6-percent increase in output and a 0.8-percent increase in hours worked. (See table A1.)
Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 0.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019 as hourly compensation grew at a faster rate (2.1 percent) than productivity (1.2 percent). Unit labor costs increased 1.7 percent over the last four quarters. (See table 2.)
Historical Revisions to Productivity and Costs Data
Data in this release reflect the annual benchmark revision of BLS Current Employment Statistics program data on private nonfarm employment and hours. See Revised measures.
BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. Increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs, and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.
Manufacturing sector labor productivity decreased 0.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, as output decreased 0.4 percent and hours worked increased 0.4 percent. Total manufacturing sector productivity declined 0.6 percent over the last four quarters, as output decreased 1.1 percent and hours worked decreased 0.5 percent. (See tables A1 and 3.) Productivity decreased 0.9 percent in the durable manufacturing sector in the fourth quarter of 2019, reflecting a 1.4-percent decrease in output and a 0.5- percent decrease in hours worked. Productivity decreased 1.2 percent in the nondurable manufacturing sector, as output increased 0.8 percent and hours worked increased 2.0 percent. (See tables A1, 4, and 5.) Unit labor costs in the total manufacturing sector increased 3.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, and increased 3.7 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See table A1.)
The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See the Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.
Revised measures
Quarterly and annual measures of hours and related series--including productivity--were revised historically for all major sectors. The revisions incorporate revised Current Employment Statistics (CES) program data published February 7, 2020. From 2015 to 2019, the data were subject to revision as a result of annual benchmarking of CES data and revised seasonal adjustment of those data. From 1990 onward, there were small revisions due to the CES reconstruction of two sectors; the transportation and warehousing sector, and the financial activities sector. Because hours worked were revised for the index base year of 2012, all measures incorporating hours worked--including productivity--were subject to revision back to 1947; resulting revisions to percent changes are small. Quarterly and annual measures of real hourly compensation for 2019 were revised due to revisions to consumer prices. In addition, third quarter, fourth quarter, and annual average data for 2019 were revised to incorporate regular updates of source data on output and compensation.
Revised and previous measures for the fourth quarter of 2019 are shown in table B1 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors. In the fourth quarter of 2019, nonfarm business productivity was revised down slightly from an increase of 1.4 percent to an increase of 1.2 percent, reflecting a 0.1-percentage point downward revision to output and a 0.1-percentage point upward revision to hours. Unit labor costs were revised down from an increase of 1.4 percent to an increase of 0.9 percent.
Manufacturing productivity decreased 0.8 percent rather than decreasing 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, reflecting an upward revision to output that was larger than an upward revision to hours. A downward revision to hourly compensation and an upward revision to productivity both contributed to a downward revision to unit labor costs, which increased 3.6 percent rather than 5.9 percent as previously reported. (See table B1.)
In the third quarter of 2019, nonfarm business productivity was revised down slightly to a decline of 0.3 percent. Unit labor costs were revised down to an increase of 0.2 percent rather than 2.5 percent as previously reported, reflecting a 2.4-percentage point downward revision to hourly compensation. In the manufacturing sector, productivity declined 0.5 percent rather than declining 0.3 percent as previously reported. Unit labor costs declined 0.7 percent rather than increasing 3.3 percent as previously reported, reflecting a large downward revision to hourly compensation. (See table B2.) Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity increased 0.9 percent in the third quarter of 2019 rather than 2.4 percent as previously reported, reflecting a 1.3-percentage point downward revision to output and a 0.1-percentage point upward revision to hours. (See table A2.)
Annual averages
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 1.7 percent in 2019, reflecting increases of 3.6 percent in hourly compensation and 1.9 percent in productivity. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 1.8 percent in 2019.
In the manufacturing sector, productivity grew 0.1 percent in 2019, as output was unchanged and hours worked decreased 0.1 percent. The average annual rate of manufacturing productivity growth from 2007 to 2019 is 0.4 percent, well below the long-term rate from 1987 to 2019 of 2.5 percent. Unit labor costs increased 3.1 percent in 2019.
Quarterly and annual data for all sectors from 2017 to 2019 appear in tables 1-6. Full historical measures can be found on the Productivity and Costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Separate output per hour from compensation per unit
Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$1,312.21/month
3.29% · Mar 5, 2020
At the later reference$1,318.83/month
3.33% · Apr 2, 2020
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $6.61 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.