2019 Fourth Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 1.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.5 percent and hours worked increased 1.1 percent. (All quarterly…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics4 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages 2019, Preliminary
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 1.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.5 percent and hours worked increased 1.1 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the fourth quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2019, productivity increased 1.8 percent, reflecting a 2.7-percent increase in output and a 0.9-percent increase in hours worked. (See table A1.)
Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 1.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019 as hourly compensation grew at a faster rate (2.8 percent) than productivity (1.4 percent). Unit labor costs increased 2.4 percent over the last four quarters. (See table 2.)
BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. Increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs, and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.
Manufacturing sector labor productivity decreased 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, as output decreased 1.0 percent and hours worked increased 0.2 percent. Total manufacturing sector productivity declined 0.7 percent over the last four quarters, as output decreased 1.2 percent and hours worked decreased 0.5 percent. (See tables A1 and 3.) Productivity decreased 0.8 percent in the durable manufacturing sector in the fourth quarter of 2019, reflecting a 1.6-percent decrease in output and a 0.8-percent decrease in hours worked. Productivity decreased 2.2 percent in the nondurable manufacturing sector, as output decreased 0.4 percent and hours worked increased 1.9 percent. (See tables A1, 4, and 5.) Unit labor costs in the total manufacturing sector increased 5.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019, and increased 5.3 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See table A1.)
The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See the Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.
Revised measures
Revised and previously published measures for the third quarter of 2019 are shown in tables A2 and B1 and cover the following major sectors: nonfarm business, business, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corporations.
Manufacturing output and all related measures--including labor productivity--were revised historically to incorporate revised BLS annual measures of sectoral output from 1987 to 2017. Regular updates of source data from the BLS, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System are reflected in data for the third and fourth quarters of 2019.
In the third quarter of 2019, nonfarm business productivity decreased 0.2 percent, the same rate as previously reported. (See table B1.) Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 2.5 percent in the third quarter, also the same rate as previously reported.
In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised down 0.4 percentage point, to a decrease of 0.3 percent. Manufacturing unit labor costs increased 3.3 percent, a 0.3-percentage point upward revision from the previous estimate.
In the nonfinancial corporate sector, productivity was revised down 0.6 percentage point in the third quarter of 2019, to an increase of 2.4 percent. This downward revision to productivity is the result of a 0.6-percentage point downward revision to output; hours worked increased 0.6 percent as previously reported. (See table A2.)
Annual averages
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 2.0 percent in 2019, reflecting increases of 3.8 percent in hourly compensation and 1.7 percent in productivity. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 1.9 percent in 2019.
In the manufacturing sector, the annual average changes in labor productivity, output, and hours worked were all 0.0 percent in 2019. The average annual rate of manufacturing productivity growth from 2007 to 2019 is 0.4 percent, well below the long-term rate from 1987 to 2019 of 2.5 percent. Unit labor costs increased 3.8 percent in 2019.
Quarterly and annual data, where available, for all sectors from 2017 to 2019 appear in tables 1-6. Full historical measures can be found on the Productivity and Costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Separate output per hour from compensation per unit
Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$1,338.77/month
3.45% · Feb 6, 2020
At the later reference$1,312.21/month
3.29% · Mar 5, 2020
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $26.56 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.