2017 Third Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 3.0 percent during the third quarter of 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 4.1 percent and hours worked increased 1.1 percent. The…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics5 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
Third Quarter 2017, Revised
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 3.0 percent during the third quarter of 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 4.1 percent and hours worked increased 1.1 percent. The productivity increase was the largest since the third quarter of 2014, when output per hour increased 4.4 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2017, productivity increased 1.5 percent, reflecting a 3.0-percent increase in output and a 1.5-percent increase in hours worked. (See tables A1 and 2.)
Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector declined 0.2 percent in the third quarter of 2017, as the 3.0-percent increase in productivity was greater than a 2.7-percent increase in hourly compensation. Unit labor costs decreased 0.7 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A1 and 2.)
BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. Increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs, and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.
Manufacturing sector labor productivity fell 4.4 percent in the third quarter of 2017, as output decreased 1.1 percent and hours worked increased 3.5 percent. This was the largest quarterly decline in manufacturing sector productivity since the fourth quarter of 2008 (-5.4 percent). Productivity decreased 4.7 percent in the durable goods manufacturing sector and 4.4 percent in the nondurable goods sector in the third quarter of 2017. Over the last four quarters, total manufacturing sector productivity increased 0.3 percent, as output increased 1.5 percent and hours worked increased 1.2 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 4.8 percent in the third quarter of 2017 and rose 0.3 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A1 and 3.)
The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See the Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.
Preliminary third-quarter 2017 measures of productivity and costs were announced for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity was unchanged in the third quarter of 2017 and increased 0.2 percent over the last four quarters. Unit labor costs increased 2.5 percent in the third quarter of 2017 and increased 0.6 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A2 and 6.)
Revised measures
Measures released today are based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Regular updates of source data from the BLS, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System are reflected in data for the second and third quarters of 2017.
In the third quarter of 2017, nonfarm business labor productivity increased 3.0 percent--the same as the preliminary estimate; output and hours worked were both revised up by 0.3 percentage points. Unit labor costs were revised from a 0.5-percent increase to a 0.2-percent decline for the third quarter of 2017. In the manufacturing sector, productivity decreased 4.4 percent rather than declining 5.0 percent as previously reported, as an upward revision to output was greater than an upward revision to hours worked. Unit labor costs increased 4.8 percent, a smaller increase than the preliminary estimate.
In the second quarter of 2017, nonfarm business labor productivity, output, and hours were unrevised. Unit labor costs decreased 1.2 percent, rather than increasing 0.3 percent as previously reported. In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised up 0.2 percentage point to an increase of 3.6 percent, due to a slight upward revision to output. Unit labor costs decreased 1.2 percent instead of a decline of 1.0 percent.
Second-quarter 2017 measures of productivity and costs were revised for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 3.3 percent rather than 4.4 percent as reported on November 2. Unit labor costs decreased 3.0 percent rather than the preliminary estimate of a 2.3-percent decline.
There were historical revisions to manufacturing output and all related measures--including productivity--back to 1987 to reflect revised output indexes constructed by the BLS using an improved methodology for estimating the sectoral output of manufacturing industries. A new technique for benchmarking output estimates to the Economic Census was an important component of the revisions, and the period between Census years 2007 and 2012 saw the largest revisions. For more complete information see www.bls.gov/mfp/sectoraloutputrevisions.htm.
Revisions to labor productivity mirrored revisions to output; hours worked were not revised. A large upward revision to the change in the annual manufacturing productivity index from 2008 to 2009 was more than offset by downward revisions in adjacent years, and the average annual rate of growth from 2007 to 2012 was revised down from 2.9 percent to 1.2 percent. The average annual rate of manufacturing productivity growth during the current business cycle from 2007 to 2016 was revised down from 1.6 percent to 0.9 percent, and the long-term rate for the entire series from 1987 to 2016 is now 2.8 percent, compared to the previous estimate of 3.2 percent.
Hourly compensation and all related measures for the manufacturing sectors also were revised, from 1987 to 2000, to incorporate source data on compensation published by the BEA November 2, 2017.
Full historical annual and quarterly measures can be found on the productivity and costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.
Calendar year 2018 release dates for Productivity and Costs news releases are now available at www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/prod2.htm.
Nonfinancial Previous quarter 0.0 1.3 1.2 2.5 0.5 2.5 corporate A year ago 0.2 1.9 1.7 0.8 -1.1 0.6
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Separate output per hour from compensation per unit
Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$1,415.00/month
3.90% · Nov 30, 2017
At the later reference$1,423.61/month
3.95% · Jan 4, 2018
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $8.61 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.