2017 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 1.5 percent during the second quarter of 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 4.0 percent and hours worked increased 2.5 percent. (All…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics5 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
Second Quarter 2017, Revised
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 1.5 percent during the second quarter of 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 4.0 percent and hours worked increased 2.5 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the second quarter of 2016 to the second quarter of 2017, productivity increased 1.3 percent, reflecting a 2.8-percent increase in output and a 1.5-percent increase in hours worked. (See tables A1 and 2.)
Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 0.2 percent in the second quarter of 2017, reflecting a 1.8-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 1.5-percent increase in productivity. Unit labor costs decreased 0.2 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A1 and 2.)
BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. Increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs, and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.
Manufacturing sector labor productivity increased 2.9 percent in the second quarter of 2017, as output increased 2.1 percent and hours worked decreased 0.7 percent. The increase in manufacturing output per hour is the largest since the first quarter of 2012, when the measure increased 3.2 percent. Productivity increased 3.8 percent in the durable goods manufacturing sector and increased 0.5 percent in the nondurable goods sector in the second quarter of 2017. The larger productivity gain in durable goods industries was due primarily to a 2.7-percent decline in hours worked, as output increased 1.0 percent. In contrast, the modest increase in nondurable manufacturing productivity reflected a 2.8-percent increase in hours worked and a 3.4- percent increase in output. Over the last four quarters, total manufacturing sector productivity increased 1.1 percent, as output increased 1.6 percent and hours worked increased 0.5 percent. (See tables A1, 3, 4 and 5.) Unit labor costs in manufacturing decreased 0.4 percent in the second quarter of 2017 and rose 0.1 percent from the same quarter a year ago.
The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See the Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.
Preliminary second-quarter 2017 measures of productivity and costs were announced for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 4.6 percent in the second quarter of 2017, as output increased 7.8 percent, and hours worked increased 3.1 percent; the increase in output was the largest since a 9.9-percent gain in the first quarter of 2012. Unit labor costs decreased 2.6 percent, as hourly compensation increased 1.9 percent and productivity increased 4.6 percent. (See tables A2 and 6.)
Revised measures
The measures released today are based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Table B1 presents previous and revised productivity and related measures for the nonfarm business, business, and manufacturing sectors.
In the second quarter of 2017, nonfarm business productivity was revised up 0.6 percentage point to an increase of 1.5 percent. Output was revised up to an increase of 4.0 percent; hours were not revised. Unit labor costs increased 0.2 percent rather than increasing 0.6 percent as reported August 9, as a 0.6-percentage point upward revision to productivity was slightly offset by a 0.2-percentage point upward revision to hourly compensation.
In the second quarter of 2017, manufacturing sector productivity was revised up to an increase of 2.9 percent from a previously-reported increase of 2.5 percent. Unit labor costs decreased 0.4 percent, a slightly larger decline than previously reported. Durable goods manufacturing productivity was not revised, and nondurable goods manufacturing productivity was revised up to an increase of 0.5 percent.
In the first quarter of 2017, nonfarm business productivity increased at the same 0.1-percent rate reported in the preliminary estimate. Unit labor costs were revised down 0.6 percentage point to an increase of 4.8 percent. Manufacturing sector productivity was revised down slightly to an increase of 0.2 percent. Hourly compensation and unit labor costs had upward revisions of 0.2 percentage point and 0.4 percentage point, respectively.
In the nonfinancial corporate sector, first-quarter 2017 productivity increased at the same 2.0-percent rate that was previously reported. Unit labor costs were revised up slightly to an increase of 2.3 percent. (See table B2.)
Hourly compensation and related measures, including unit labor costs, in the business and nonfarm business sectors were revised back to the first quarter of 2014 to incorporate revised data used in the estimation of employee compensation. In both sectors, annual average growth in unit labor costs was revised up 0.1 percentage point in 2016, revised down 0.1 percentage point in 2015, and revised up 0.1 percentage point in 2014.
Full historical annual and quarterly measures can be found on the productivity and costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.
Methodology change for manufacturing output
Beginning with the Productivity and Costs news release scheduled for December 6, 2017, BLS plans to incorporate source data reflecting a change in methodology for estimating manufacturing output. For more information see: www.bls.gov/mfp/sectoraloutputrevisions.htm.
Durable Previous quarter 3.8 1.0 -2.7 3.1 3.5 -0.6 manufacturing A year ago 1.3 1.6 0.3 0.9 -1.0 -0.4
Nondurable Previous quarter 0.5 3.4 2.8 1.6 1.9 1.0 manufacturing A year ago 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.9 0.0 1.1
Nonfinancial Previous quarter 4.6 7.8 3.1 1.9 2.2 -2.6 corporate A year ago 1.9 3.7 1.8 1.1 -0.8 -0.8
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Separate output per hour from compensation per unit
Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$1,394.46/month
3.78% · Sep 7, 2017
At the later reference$1,406.42/month
3.85% · Oct 5, 2017
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $11.97 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.