Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2010 Third Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Labor productivity is calculated by dividing an index of real output…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2010, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Labor productivity is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of the combined hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers. Output increased 3.7 percent and hours worked increased 1.4 percent in the third quarter. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) Nonfarm business productivity increased 2.5 percent from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010, as output increased 4.3 percent and hours worked rose 1.7 percent (tables A and 2).

The productivity measures released today are based on more recent and more complete data than were available for the preliminary report issued last month (see Revised measures).

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses decreased 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2010, because productivity grew 2.3 percent while hourly compensation increased 2.2 percent. Over the last four quarters, unit labor costs declined 1.1 percent (tables A and 2). BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Business sector productivity increased 2.5 percent in the third quarter of 2010, as output increased 3.7 percent and hours increased 1.2 percent. Over the last four quarters, business sector productivity increased 2.6 percent.

Manufacturing sector productivity rose 0.6 percent in the third quarter of 2010, as output and hours grew 4.2 percent and 3.6 percent, respectively. In the durable manufacturing subsector, output per hour declined 0.5 percent as output grew 6.0 percent but hours grew faster, 6.5 percent. In nondurable goods industries productivity increased 3.2 percent, due both to an increase in output and a decline in hours. Over the last four quarters, total manufacturing productivity increased 4.0 percent as output rose 7.1 percent and hours increased 3.0 percent (tables A and 3). Manufacturing unit labor costs increased 1.0 percent in the third quarter of 2010, but fell 2.9 percent over the last four quarters.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for more information on data sources.

Preliminary third-quarter 2010 data for the nonfinancial corporate sector also were released today. Output per hour fell 2.4 percent as output declined 0.2 percent and hours rose 2.3 percent.

Revised measures

Measures for the second and third quarters of 2010 for all sectors reflect normal updates of source data including output, employment, and hours. Additionally, manufacturing productivity, output, and unit labor costs series were revised back to 1987 to reflect revised output indexes constructed by BLS using data from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Table B presents previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: business, nonfarm business and manufacturing, for the third and second quarters of 2010. Revised annual indexes for the manufacturing sectors appear in appendix tables 1-3. Full historical annual and quarterly measures can be found on the labor productivity and costs home page http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

In the nonfarm business sector, third quarter productivity growth was revised up to 2.3 percent from a previous estimate of 1.9 percent, because the upward revision to output was greater than the upward revision to hours. Nonfarm business productivity in the second quarter was not revised. Unit labor costs declined by the same amount in the third quarter as previously reported, 0.1 percent. However, second quarter unit labor costs were revised up substantially due to an upward revision to hourly compensation.

In the manufacturing sector, slight upward revisions to output resulted in similar upward revisions to productivity in both the third and second quarters of 2010. Upward revisions to hourly compensation affected unit labor costs. Third quarter unit labor costs increased 1.0 percent rather than declining 0.3 percent. Second quarter unit labor costs were revised to -0.7 percent from the preliminary estimate of -6.4 percent reported on November 4.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics is conducting a customer survey to solicit suggestions from the public to enhance the quality and relevance of BLS productivity data and publications. The survey is available at www.bls.gov/lpc until December 15, 2010.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2010

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Dec 1, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierNov 1, 2010Publication referenceDec 1, 201030 days laterDec 31, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.23%Observed 4.40%Observed +17 bps vs. earlier reference4.86%Observed +46 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Sep 1, 2010 – Mar 1, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Dec 1, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.75%5.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 2, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.35% · Sep 9, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.27% · Oct 7, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.19% · Oct 14, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.21% · Oct 21, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Oct 28, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.24% · Nov 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.17% · Nov 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Nov 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Nov 24, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Dec 2, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.61% · Dec 9, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.83% · Dec 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Dec 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.86% · Dec 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.77% · Jan 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · Jan 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.74% · Jan 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.80% · Jan 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Feb 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Feb 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 5.00% · Feb 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.95% · Feb 24, 2011Sep 1, 2010Dec 1, 2010Mar 1, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,502.28/month

4.40% · Nov 24, 2010

At the later reference$1,584.89/month

4.86% · Dec 30, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $82.61 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →