Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2010 Third Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.9 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2010, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.9 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers. Output increased 3.0 percent and hours worked increased 1.1 percent in the third quarter. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) Productivity increased 2.5 percent over the last four quarters, as output rose 4.1 percent and hours worked rose 1.6 percent (tables A and 2).

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses decreased 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2010, because productivity grew 1.9 percent while hourly compensation increased 1.8 percent. From the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010, unit labor costs declined 1.9 percent (tables A and 2). BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity rose 0.4 percent in the third quarter of 2010, as output grew 4.0 percent and hours worked increased 3.6 percent. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 3.9 percent as output rose 7.0 percent and hours increased 3.0 percent (tables A and 3). Productivity for the sector increased at a 6.3 percent annual rate during the five quarters of the current business cycle expansion, which began in the third quarter of 2009. This contrasts with the 1.3 percent productivity decline during the recent recession, as measured from the fourth quarter of 2007 through the second quarter of 2009.

In the third quarter of 2010, productivity declined 0.8 percent in the durable goods manufacturing sector as output grew more slowly than hours worked; productivity in nondurable goods industries increased 2.9 percent as output rose 2.2 percent while hours fell 0.7 percent (tables A, 4, and 5).

Manufacturing unit labor costs fell 0.3 percent in the third quarter of 2010 and 4.6 percent from the same quarter a year ago (tables A and 3). The four-quarter decline in unit labor costs reflects a 3.9 percent increase in productivity and a 0.9 percent decline in hourly compensation.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Revised measures

Nonfarm business productivity for the second quarter of 2010 fell at the same 1.8 percent rate that was reported on September 2. Unit labor costs were revised up due to an upward revision in hourly compensation. In the manufacturing sector, productivity increased at an annual rate of 5.4 percent in the second quarter, rather than 4.1 percent as reported September 2. Manufacturing unit labor costs declined 6.4 percent in the second quarter.

In the nonfinancial corporate sector, revised data for the second quarter of 2010 show that productivity fell 1.6 percent, more than the 0.5 percent decline reported previously. After revision, unit labor costs increased 0.9 percent in the second quarter, following two quarters of large declines. Unit profits increased at a 21.7 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2010.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics is conducting a customer survey to solicit suggestions from the public to enhance the quality and relevance of BLS productivity data and publications. The survey is available at www.bls.gov/lpc until December 15, 2010.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate

Percent change, annual rate

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 4, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 5, 2010Publication referenceNov 4, 201030 days laterDec 4, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.32%Observed 4.24%Observed −8 bps vs. earlier reference4.46%Observed +22 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 4, 2010 – Feb 4, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 4, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.50%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Aug 5, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.44% · Aug 12, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.42% · Aug 19, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.36% · Aug 26, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 2, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.35% · Sep 9, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.27% · Oct 7, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.19% · Oct 14, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.21% · Oct 21, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Oct 28, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.24% · Nov 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.17% · Nov 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Nov 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Nov 24, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Dec 2, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.61% · Dec 9, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.83% · Dec 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Dec 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.86% · Dec 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.77% · Jan 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · Jan 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.74% · Jan 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.80% · Jan 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Feb 3, 2011Aug 4, 2010Nov 4, 2010Feb 4, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,474.06/month

4.24% · Nov 4, 2010

At the later reference$1,512.93/month

4.46% · Dec 2, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $38.87 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →