Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2010 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 1.8 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today as hours increased 3.5 percent and output increased 1.6 percent.…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2010, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 1.8 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today as hours increased 3.5 percent and output increased 1.6 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) The second-quarter gain in hours worked was the largest since the first quarter of 2006. From the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010, productivity and output both grew 3.7 percent and hours were unchanged (tables A and 2). Nonfarm business productivity increased at an average annual rate of 2.5 percent from 2000 through 2009.

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses rose 1.1 percent in the second quarter of 2010, as the 1.8 percent decline in productivity was partially offset by a 0.7 percent decline in hourly compensation. Unit labor costs decreased 2.8 percent over the last four quarters, as output per hour increased faster than hourly compensation (tables A and 2).

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity grew 4.1 percent in the second quarter of 2010, as output rose 8.4 percent and hours worked increased 4.1 percent. Productivity performance differed between the two manufacturing subsectors. In durable manufacturing, output per hour increased 9.9 percent as output grew 13.6 percent and hours rose 3.4 percent. In nondurable goods industries, productivity fell 2.4 percent as output grew 2.8 percent but hours grew 5.3 percent (tables A, 3, 4 and 5). Total manufacturing productivity increased 7.5 percent over the last four quarters and 3.0 percent per year on average from 2000 through 2009.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing declined 5.9 percent in the second quarter of 2010 due to both the 4.1 percent increase in productivity and a 2.0 percent decline in hourly compensation (tables A and 3). Unit labor costs fell 7.3 percent over the last four quarters, the largest four- quarter decrease since the series began in 1988.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Preliminary data for the second quarter of 2010 for the nonfinancial corporate sector also were released today. Productivity declined 0.5 percent as output and hours increased 4.0 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively (tables C and 6).

Revised measures

Tables B and C present previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: nonfarm business, business and manufacturing, as well as nonfinancial corporations.

In the second quarter of 2010, nonfarm business sector productivity was revised down and unit labor costs were revised up as a result of a downward revision to output. In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised down to 4.1 percent from 4.5 percent; hours were revised up more than output. Unit labor costs did not fall as fast as previously reported due to the downward revision to productivity.

In the first quarter of 2010, nonfarm business sector productivity was not revised, and manufacturing sector productivity was revised upwards. In both sectors, unit labor costs fell more than previously reported as hourly compensation was revised downward.

Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity growth in the first quarter of 2010 was revised down to 8.6 percent from 9.1 percent reflecting a downward revision to output. Unit labor costs were revised down as hourly compensation was revised down more than productivity.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, first quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2010

Percent change, annual rate, first quarter 2010

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 2, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 3, 2010Publication referenceSep 2, 201030 days laterOct 2, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.54%Observed 4.32%Observed −22 bps vs. earlier reference4.32%Observed Unchanged vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 2, 2010 – Dec 2, 2010
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 2, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.50%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.79% · Jun 3, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.72% · Jun 10, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.75% · Jun 17, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.69% · Jun 24, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.58% · Jul 1, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Jul 8, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Jul 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.56% · Jul 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.54% · Jul 29, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Aug 5, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.44% · Aug 12, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.42% · Aug 19, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.36% · Aug 26, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 2, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.35% · Sep 9, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.27% · Oct 7, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.19% · Oct 14, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.21% · Oct 21, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Oct 28, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.24% · Nov 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.17% · Nov 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Nov 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Nov 24, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Dec 2, 2010Jun 2, 2010Sep 2, 2010Dec 2, 2010
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,488.14/month

4.32% · Sep 2, 2010

At the later reference$1,488.14/month

4.32% · Sep 30, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is unchanged. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →