Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2010 First Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 3.6 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, with output rising 4.4 percent and hours worked rising 0.8 percent.…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2010, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 3.6 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, with output rising 4.4 percent and hours worked rising 0.8 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2010, output increased 3.1 percent while hours fell 3.0 percent, yielding an increase in productivity of 6.3 percent (tables A and 2). This gain in productivity from the same quarter a year ago was the largest since output per hour increased 7.0 percent over the four-quarter period ending in the first quarter of 1962.

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses fell 1.6 percent in the first quarter of 2010, as the 3.6 percent increase in productivity outpaced a 1.9 percent gain in hourly compensation. Unit labor costs fell 3.7 percent over the last four quarters, as the 6.3 percent increase in productivity outpaced a 2.3 percent rise in hourly compensation (tables A and 2).

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity grew 2.5 percent in the first quarter of 2010, as output rose 7.5 percent and hours worked increased 4.9 percent, the first increase in hours since the second quarter of 2007. Gains in productivity, output, and hours were each larger in the durable goods sector than in the nondurable goods sector (tables A, 3, 4 and 5). Unit labor costs in manufacturing declined 3.7 percent in the first quarter of 2010 and fell 6.1 percent over the last four quarters. The four-quarter decline was the largest in the series, which begins in the first quarter of 1988.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Fourth quarter and annual 2009 measures of productivity and costs were announced for the nonfinancial corporate sector (tables C and 6). Output per employee hour rose 8.2 percent for the fourth quarter of 2009 as output and hours rose 8.5 percent and 0.3 percent, respectively.

Revised measures

Revised measures of real hourly compensation for all sectors for 2005 onward reflect revisions in the consumer price series based on new and revised data from the BLS Office of Prices and Living Conditions. Output data for the manufacturing sectors incorporates revised output indexes constructed by BLS using data from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Accordingly, manufacturing output, productivity and unit labor costs were revised back to 1987, the first year in the series (appendix tables 1-3). Table B presents previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: business, nonfarm business and manufacturing, for the fourth quarter and annual averages of 2009.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, nonfarm business productivity growth was revised down to 6.3 percent, reflecting a 0.6 percentage point downward revision to output and a 0.1 percentage point upward revision to hours. After revision, unit labor costs fell 5.6 percent--a smaller decline than previously reported. In the manufacturing sector, fourth-quarter productivity growth was revised down slightly to 6.5 percent.

Full historical annual and quarterly measures are available on the productivity and costs home page: http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data

Beginning with the Productivity and Costs news release scheduled for August 10, 2010, index series will be rebased from 1992=100 to 2005=100. Also, the presentation of the data in tables 1-6 will be reformatted. In the new format, the three panels in each table will be rearranged. The first panel will present percent changes from the previous quarter, the second will show percent changes from the corresponding quarter of the previous year, and the third will show indexes. Also, all data will be presented in reverse chronological order, listing the most recent data first.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2009

Percent change, annual average 2009

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2009

Percent change, annual average 2009

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 6, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 6, 2010Publication referenceMay 6, 201030 days laterJun 5, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.08%Observed 5.00%Observed −8 bps vs. earlier reference4.79%Observed −21 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 6, 2010 – Aug 6, 2010
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 6, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.75%5.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.97% · Feb 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.93% · Feb 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Feb 25, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.97% · Mar 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.95% · Mar 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.96% · Mar 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.99% · Mar 25, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.08% · Apr 1, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Apr 8, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.06% · Apr 29, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.00% · May 6, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.93% · May 13, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.84% · May 20, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · May 27, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.79% · Jun 3, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.72% · Jun 10, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.75% · Jun 17, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.69% · Jun 24, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.58% · Jul 1, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Jul 8, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Jul 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.56% · Jul 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.54% · Jul 29, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Aug 5, 2010Feb 6, 2010May 6, 2010Aug 6, 2010
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,610.46/month

5.00% · May 6, 2010

At the later reference$1,572.18/month

4.79% · Jun 3, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $38.28 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →