Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2009 Fourth Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 6.9 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The gain in productivity reflects a 7.6 percent increase in output…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages 2009, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 6.9 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The gain in productivity reflects a 7.6 percent increase in output partially offset by a 0.6 percent increase in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the fourth quarter of 2008 to the fourth quarter of 2009, productivity increased 5.8 percent as output declined 0.2 percent and hours fell 5.7 percent (table A). The annual measure of productivity increased 3.8 percent from 2008 to 2009 (table D).

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses fell 5.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, the result of productivity increasing faster than hourly compensation. Unit labor costs decreased 4.7 percent from the same quarter a year ago, the largest four-quarter decline since the series began in 1948 (table A). The annual average index of unit labor costs declined 1.7 percent from 2008 to 2009, the largest decline in that series (table D).

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Data in this release reflect annual benchmark revision of BLS Current Employment Statistics program data on nonfarm employee hours, and revised seasonal adjustment of those data. Also, hours of other nonfarm and farm workers based on the BLS Current Population Survey incorporate new seasonal adjustment factors. More detail can be found in tables 1 through 6 and appendix tables 1 through 6. See Revised measures.

Manufacturing sector productivity rose 6.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, as output increased 5.5 percent and hours decreased 1.0 percent. Productivity grew 6.8 percent in the durable goods industries and 6.4 percent in the nondurable goods industries (table A). Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 6.1 percent as output declined 4.6 percent and hours worked fell 10.1 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing declined 6.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009 and decreased 4.7 percent over the last four quarters.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Revised measures

Quarterly and annual measures for all sectors were revised back to 2005 to incorporate the annual benchmark adjustment and updated information on seasonal trends from the BLS nonfarm payroll series. Hours and related measures for the business and nonfarm business sectors were revised to incorporate updated information on seasonal trends in Current Population Survey data on hours worked. Revised and previous measures for the third and fourth quarters of 2009 are shown in table B for the business, nonfarm business and manufacturing sectors and table C for the third quarter measures for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Quarterly and annual data for all sectors appear in tables 1-6 for 2007 through 2009, and in appendix tables 1-6 for 2005 and 2006. Full historical annual and quarterly measures can be found on the labor productivity and costs home page http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, nonfarm business productivity growth was revised up to 6.9 percent from the estimate of 6.2 percent published on February 4, 2010. The larger productivity gain reflects a 0.4 percentage point upward revision to output and a similar downward revision to hours. Unit labor costs for nonfarm business fell 5.9 percent--more than previously reported. In manufacturing, productivity was revised down from 7.8 percent to 6.6 percent due to a downward revision to output and a smaller decline in hours than in the preliminary estimate.

In the third quarter of 2009, nonfarm business productivity was revised up to 7.8 percent from 7.2 percent when hours were revised downward and output was not revised. A large downward revision to unit labor costs was due more to the large downward revision in hourly compensation than the small upward revision in output per hour. In manufacturing, productivity was revised up slightly. As in the nonfarm business sector, there were large downward revisions to hourly compensation and unit labor costs. Productivity in nonfinancial corporations was revised down for the third quarter, as output was revised down much more than hours (table C).

Manufacturing sector productivity grew 1.8 percent in 2009, due to a slightly larger decline in hours (-12.6 percent) than in output (-11.1 percent). These were the largest annual declines in the output and hours series, which begin in 1988. Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 2.6 percent in 2009, in contrast to the decline in the nonfarm business sector. Manufacturing productivity increased at an average annual rate of 3.2 percent from 2000 to 2009.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 4, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 2, 2010Publication referenceMar 4, 201030 days laterApr 3, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.98%Observed 4.97%Observed −1 bps vs. earlier reference5.08%Observed +11 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 4, 2009 – Jun 4, 2010
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 4, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.50%5.00%5.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Dec 10, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.94% · Dec 17, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Dec 24, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 5.14% · Dec 31, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 5.09% · Jan 7, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.06% · Jan 14, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.99% · Jan 21, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.98% · Jan 28, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.01% · Feb 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.97% · Feb 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.93% · Feb 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Feb 25, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.97% · Mar 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.95% · Mar 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.96% · Mar 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.99% · Mar 25, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.08% · Apr 1, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Apr 8, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.06% · Apr 29, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.00% · May 6, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.93% · May 13, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.84% · May 20, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · May 27, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.79% · Jun 3, 2010Dec 4, 2009Mar 4, 2010Jun 4, 2010
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,604.97/month

4.97% · Mar 4, 2010

At the later reference$1,625.16/month

5.08% · Apr 1, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $20.20 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →