Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2009 Fourth Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 6.2 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This gain in productivity reflects increases of 7.2 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages 2009, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 6.2 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This gain in productivity reflects increases of 7.2 percent in output and 1.0 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) This was the first quarterly increase in hours worked since the second quarter of 2007 (0.9 percent). Productivity increased 5.1 percent over the last four quarters --more than during any similar period since output per hour rose 6.1 percent from the first quarter of 2001 to the first quarter of 2002 (table A).

Labor productivity is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of the combined hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses fell 4.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, a result of the increase in productivity (6.2 percent) outpacing the increase in hourly compensation (1.5 percent). BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them. Over the last four quarters, unit labor costs declined 2.8 percent, as hourly compensation and productivity increased 2.2 percent and 5.1 percent, respectively (table A). This decline in unit labor costs was the largest since unit labor costs fell 3.2 percent over the four quarters ending with the first quarter of 2002.

Data in this release do not reflect the annual benchmark revision of the BLS Current Employment Statistics program data to be released February 5, 2010. This benchmark will be incorporated in our next release on March 4, 2010.

Manufacturing sector productivity grew 7.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, as output rose 6.1 percent and hours worked declined 1.6 percent. Productivity grew 6.2 percent in durable goods industries and 9.8 percent in nondurable goods industries in the fourth quarter. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 6.5 percent as output decreased 4.4 percent and hours fell 10.2 percent (table A). Unit labor costs in manufacturing declined 7.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009 and decreased 3.2 percent from the same quarter a year earlier (table A).

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing output series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business output series, and these measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Revised measures

Revised and previous measures for the third quarter of 2009 in tables B and D cover the major sectors: nonfarm business, business, manufacturing and nonfinancial corporations.

In the third quarter of 2009, nonfarm business productivity growth was revised down from 8.1 percent to 7.2 percent compared to the estimate published on December 3, reflecting a downward revision to output and a slight upward revision to hours. Unit labor costs for nonfarm business fell 1.5 percent, a smaller decline than previously reported. In both the manufacturing and nonfinancial corporate sectors productivity was revised upward due to upward revisions in output.

Quarterly and annual data for all sectors for 2007 to 2009 appear in tables 1-6. Full historical measures can be found on the productivity and costs home page http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 4, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 5, 2010Publication referenceFeb 4, 201030 days laterMar 6, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.14%Observed 5.01%Observed −13 bps vs. earlier reference4.97%Observed −4 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 4, 2009 – May 4, 2010
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 4, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.50%5.00%5.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.98% · Nov 5, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.91% · Nov 12, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.83% · Nov 19, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · Nov 25, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · Dec 3, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Dec 10, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 4.94% · Dec 17, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Dec 24, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 5.14% · Dec 31, 200930-year fixed mortgage: 5.09% · Jan 7, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.06% · Jan 14, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.99% · Jan 21, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.98% · Jan 28, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.01% · Feb 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.97% · Feb 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.93% · Feb 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Feb 25, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.97% · Mar 4, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.95% · Mar 11, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.96% · Mar 18, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.99% · Mar 25, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.08% · Apr 1, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Apr 8, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.06% · Apr 29, 2010Nov 4, 2009Feb 4, 2010May 4, 2010
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,612.30/month

5.01% · Feb 4, 2010

At the later reference$1,604.97/month

4.97% · Mar 4, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $7.33 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →