Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2000 Second Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons-- for the second quarter of 2000. The preliminary seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2000

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons-- for the second quarter of 2000. The preliminary seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the second quarter were:

6.2 percent in the business sector and 5.3 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity grew more rapidly in the second quarter than in the first quarter, when output per hour of all persons (as revised) rose 1.6 percent in the business sector and 1.9 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In manufacturing, productivity changes in the second quarter were:

5.1 percent in manufacturing, 9.6 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 0.0 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Productivity rose 5.1 percent in the manufacturing sector in the second quarter as output and hours of all persons increased 7.0 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively. In the first quarter, manufacturing productivity rose 7.9 percent (as revised). Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 17 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Second-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data in this release reflect the regular multi-year GDP revisions released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce on July 28. They also reflect the annual benchmark revision to the BLS establishment survey data and revisions to hours series released by BLS on June 2. All employment and hours series incorporate new information on seasonal patterns. In addition, measures of output for the manufacturing sectors were revised. See Revised Measures. Appendix tables 1-6 show revised historical series.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the first to the second quarter of 2000, business sector productivity increased at a 6.2-percent annual rate, as output rose 5.7 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector fell at a 0.4-percent annual rate. As revised, labor productivity rose 1.6 percent in the first quarter as output and hours increased 5.3 and 3.7 percent, respectively (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 6.3 percent in the second quarter and 3.5 percent in the first quarter of 2000 (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, edged up 0.1 percent during the second quarter, following a 1.9-percent rise in the first quarter of 2000.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, rose at a 2.6 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2000 after declining 0.4 percent in the previous quarter.

The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased 2.5 percent in the second quarter and 3.0 percent in the first quarter of 2000.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 5.3 percent in the nonfarm business sector during the second quarter of 2000, after rising 1.9 percent in the first quarter (table 2). Output rose 5.9 percent in the second quarter, after increasing 5.2 percent during the first quarter of 2000. Hours of all persons working in the sector increased 0.5 percent in the second quarter. This was the smallest increase in hours since the first quarter of 1996 (when they fell 0.1 percent) and followed a 3.2 percent rise in the first quarter of 2000.

Hourly compensation increased 5.3 percent in the second quarter, after posting a 3.9-percent gain in the first quarter of 2000. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation for the second quarter of 2000 rose 1.6 percent.

Unit labor costs decreased 0.1 percent in the second quarter of 2000, after rising 1.9 percent one quarter earlier. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output grew 2.2 percent in the second quarter and 3.2 percent in the first quarter of 2000.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 5.1 percent in manufacturing, as output rose 7.0 percent and hours of all persons increased 1.7 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Growth in productivity, output, and hours was quite different in the durable and nondurable goods subsectors. In durable goods, productivity rose 9.6 percent, reflecting output growth of 13.3 percent and a 3.4-percent rise in hours of all persons. In nondurable goods, productivity remained unchanged in the second quarter, as output and hours both fell 0.8 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 4.4 percent during the second quarter. This reflects growth of 3.8 percent in durable goods and 5.1 percent in nondurable goods. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, the real hourly compensation of all manu- facturing workers rose 0.8 percent in the second quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing dropped 0.7 percent in the second quarter. This marked the third consecutive quarter of falling unit labor costs for the total manufacturing sector; unit labor costs fell 3.0 percent in the first quarter of 2000 and 5.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 1999. In the second quarter of 2000, trends in unit labor costs in the two sub- sectors were quite different, reflecting the very different growth rates in productivity. Unit labor costs fell 5.3 percent in durable goods manu- facturing and rose 5.1 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing. The increase in unit labor costs in nondurable goods manufacturing was the largest since a 5.8-percent rise was posted in the second quarter of 1993.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the first quarter of 2000 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, both the output and hours measures grew less than reported on June 6, based on information then available. Labor productivity growth was revised down. In manufacturing, productivity growth was revised up to reflect higher output growth and a larger drop in hours than originally reported.

Data on manufacturing output for 1997 and 1998 were revised to reflect newly available data on shipments from the U.S. Census Bureau. There also were small revisions to earlier years reflecting the incorporation of new data associated with the 1999 comprehensive revisions to the National Income and Product Accounts.

Output data for the business and nonfarm business sectors and compensation series for all sectors incorporate the revisions of the national income and product accounts produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. In addition, small changes have been made to the historical estimates of employment in for-profit organizations and corporations. Labor input measures have been revised further to reflect the annual benchmarking of employment levels derived from the monthly Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey that occurred on June 2. Updated seasonal adjustment factors also have been incorporated into the labor input measures. These revisions extend back to the first quarter of 1995. Appendix tables 1-6 present quarterly and annual measures for all sectors for 1995-97.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for the first quarter for nonfinancial corporations also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on June 6. Productivity, output, employee hours, and hourly compensation grew more slowly than previously reported. Unit profits and the implicit price deflator were revised up from the preliminary estimates reported in June (table C).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 8, 2000.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 9, 2000Publication referenceAug 8, 200030 days laterSep 7, 2000
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.16%Observed 8.12%Observed −4 bps vs. earlier reference7.96%Observed −16 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 8, 2000 – Nov 8, 2000
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 8, 2000Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.25%9.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 8.52% · May 12, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.64% · May 19, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.62% · May 26, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.54% · Jun 2, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.32% · Jun 9, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.22% · Jun 16, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.14% · Jun 23, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.22% · Jun 30, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Jul 7, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.09% · Jul 14, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.21% · Jul 21, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.13% · Jul 28, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.12% · Aug 4, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.04% · Aug 11, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.96% · Aug 18, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.99% · Aug 25, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.96% · Sep 1, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · Sep 8, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Sep 15, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.90% · Sep 22, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Sep 29, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · Oct 6, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Oct 13, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · Oct 20, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.68% · Oct 27, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 3, 2000May 8, 2000Aug 8, 2000Nov 8, 2000
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,226.44/month

8.12% · Aug 4, 2000

At the later reference$2,192.93/month

7.96% · Sep 1, 2000

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $33.51 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →