Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2000 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 2000. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2000

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 2000. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the second quarter were:

6.5 percent in the business sector and 5.7 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, increases in productivity were larger than reported on Aug. 8, reflecting both upward revisions in output and downward revisions in hours of all persons. (See table C.)

In manufacturing, the revised productivity changes in the second quarter were: 5.4 percent in manufacturing, 10.6 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and -0.8 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

In total manufacturing, the change in productivity was revised upward compared with the preliminary estimate. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 17 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Second-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5; the differences between these measures and the preliminary second-quarter figures issued on Aug. 8 are shown in table C.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the first to the second quarter of 2000, business sector productivity rose at a 6.5 percent annual rate, as output increased 5.9 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector decreased 0.6 percent (table A). In the previous quarter, productivity had increased 1.6 percent, reflecting a 5.3-percent increase in output and a 3.7-percent increase in hours (table 1).

A rise in hourly compensation of 6.4 percent in the second quarter was the largest increase in that measure since the fourth quarter of 1997, when it rose 6.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Hourly compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased at a 2.7 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2000, after falling at a 0.4 percent annual rate in the first quarter.

Changes in unit labor costs reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity. Unit labor costs decreased 0.1 percent in the second quarter of 2000, after rising 1.9 percent in the first quarter (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The implicit price deflator for the business sector rose 2.6 percent in the second quarter due to a 7.1-percent rise in unit nonlabor payments, which was more than enough to offset the slight drop in unit labor costs.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector increased 5.7 percent during the second quarter of 2000, as output increased 6.1 percent and hours of all persons rose 0.4 percent (table A). The increase in hours was the smallest since the first quarter of 1996, when hours decreased 0.1 percent. In the first quarter of 2000, nonfarm productivity had increased 1.9 percent, as output and hours grew 5.2 percent and 3.2 percent, respectively (table 2).

Hourly compensation grew at a 5.3 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2000, following a 3.9 percent increase in the first quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 1.7 percent in the second quarter of 2000.

In the second quarter of 2000, unit labor costs decreased 0.4 percent in the nonfarm business sector. This measure had increased 1.9 percent in the first quarter. Unit nonlabor payments grew 6.6 percent in the second quarter of 2000, and the implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 2.3 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates).

Manufacturing

In the second quarter of 2000, productivity increased 5.4 percent in manufacturing, as output grew 7.3 percent and hours of all persons rose 1.9 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The second-quarter increase in output per hour was due entirely to a 10.6 percent productivity gain in the durable goods sector, as output per hour dropped 0.8 percent in the nondurable goods sector (tables 3, 4, and 5). In durable goods, output grew 14.4 percent, and hours rose 3.4 percent. In contrast, nondurable goods output and hours both fell--1.3 and 0.5 percent, respectively.

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 3.3 percent during the second quarter of 2000, reflecting a 2.9 percent rise in hourly compensation in durable goods industries and a 3.7 percent increase in the nondurable goods sector. Real hourly compensation in the total manufacturing sector fell off slightly, by 0.3 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a decline of 0.7 percent in durable goods and a 0.1-percent rise in nondurable goods. The decline in real hourly compensation in manufacturing was the first in this series since a 0.8-percent drop in the second quarter of 1997.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing dropped 2.0 percent in the second quarter of 2000. Trends in the two subsectors differed; unit labor costs fell 7.0 percent in durable goods and rose 4.5 percent in nondurable goods. The decline in unit labor costs in the durable goods manufacturing sector was the third consecutive drop in this series.

Nonfinancial corporations

Preliminary second-quarter 2000 measures of productivity and costs also were announced today for nonfinancial corporations (tables B and 6). Productivity increased 5.0 percent during the second quarter, as output rose 5.9 percent and hours increased 0.9 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Nonfinancial corporations include all corporations doing business in the United States except those classified as depository institutions, nondepository institutions, security and commodity brokers, insurance carriers, regulated investment offices, small business investment offices, and real estate investment trusts.

Hourly compensation rose 5.6 percent in the second quarter, the largest rise since a 5.7-percent increase in the fourth quarter of 1997. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 1.9 percent in the second quarter of 2000 (table 6).

Unit labor costs for nonfinancial corporations increased 0.6 percent in the second quarter of 2000, after declining in the two previous quarters. Unit profits rose 13.5 percent in the second quarter, marking the second consecutive quarter with a two-digit increase. The implicit price deflator for nonfinancial corporate output rose 2.4 percent in the second quarter of 2000.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the second quarter of 2000 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. The quarterly movements differ from those reported on Aug. 8 based on information then available. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, upward changes in output and downward revisions to hours led to larger increases in productivity than previously reported. In the manufacturing sector, productivity also was revised up, as an upward revision to output more than offset an upward revision to hours.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 6, 2000.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 7, 2000Publication referenceSep 6, 200030 days laterOct 6, 2000
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.12%Observed 7.96%Observed −16 bps vs. earlier reference7.83%Observed −13 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 6, 2000 – Dec 6, 2000
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 6, 2000Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.00%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 8.32% · Jun 9, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.22% · Jun 16, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.14% · Jun 23, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.22% · Jun 30, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Jul 7, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.09% · Jul 14, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.21% · Jul 21, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.13% · Jul 28, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.12% · Aug 4, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.04% · Aug 11, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.96% · Aug 18, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.99% · Aug 25, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.96% · Sep 1, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · Sep 8, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Sep 15, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.90% · Sep 22, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Sep 29, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · Oct 6, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Oct 13, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · Oct 20, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.68% · Oct 27, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 3, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.79% · Nov 10, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 17, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 24, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Dec 1, 2000Jun 6, 2000Sep 6, 2000Dec 6, 2000
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,192.93/month

7.96% · Sep 1, 2000

At the later reference$2,165.85/month

7.83% · Oct 6, 2000

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $27.09 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →