Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

August 2011 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods was unchanged in August, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Finished goods prices advanced 0.2 percent in July and declined 0.4 percent in June. At the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods was unchanged in August, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Finished goods prices advanced 0.2 percent in July and declined 0.4 percent in June. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods decreased 0.5 percent in August, and the crude goods index moved up 0.2 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods increased 6.5 percent for the 12 months ended August 2011, the smallest year-over-year advance since a 5.6- percent rise in March 2011. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

The index for finished goods was unchanged in August, as a 1.1-percent increase in finished consumer foods prices and a 0.1-percent advance in the index for finished goods less foods and energy offset a 1.0-percent decrease in prices for finished energy goods.

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods jumped 1.1 percent in August, the third straight rise. Over thirty percent of the August advance can be traced to meat prices, which climbed 2.4 percent. Higher prices for processed poultry and eggs for fresh use also were major factors in the increase in the finished foods index. (See table 2.)

Finished core: Prices for finished goods less foods and energy inched up 0.1 percent in August, the ninth consecutive advance. Over twenty percent of the August increase is attributable to the index for tires, which climbed 1.4 percent. Higher prices for radio and television communication equipment also contributed to the rise in the finished core index.

Finished energy: The index for finished energy goods fell 1.0 percent in August, the third straight decrease. Over half of the August decline is due to a 6.0-percent drop in prices for liquefied petroleum gas. Lower prices for gasoline and diesel fuel also were significant factors in the decrease in the finished energy goods index.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components fell 0.5 percent in August, the first decrease since July 2010. Most of the August decline can be attributed to lower prices for intermediate energy goods, which dropped 2.3 percent. The index for intermediate materials less foods and energy also contributed to this decrease, edging down 0.1 percent. By contrast, prices for intermediate foods and feeds advanced 1.7 percent. On a 12-month basis, the index for intermediate goods moved up 10.3 percent in August. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: The index for intermediate energy goods fell 2.3 percent in August, the largest decline since a 2.6-percent drop in July 2009. Nearly thirty percent of the August decrease can be attributed to diesel fuel prices, which fell 5.9 percent. Declines in the indexes for lubricating oil base stocks and liquefied petroleum gas also contributed to lower intermediate energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy edged down 0.1 percent in August, the first decline since July 2010. In August, about eighty-five percent of the decrease can be traced to a 2.6-percent drop in prices for thermoplastic resins and materials. A decline in the index for hot rolled steel sheet and strip also contributed to lower intermediate core prices.

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds rose 1.7 percent in August, the third consecutive advance. Over twenty percent of the August increase is attributable to formula feed prices, which climbed 3.7 percent.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing moved up 0.2 percent in August. For the 3-month period ending in August, prices for crude materials declined 1.6 percent following a 1.3-percent drop from February to May. In August, the increase in the crude goods index is mostly attributable to prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs, which climbed 4.7 percent. Also contributing to the August advance was a 1.6-percent rise in prices for crude nonfood materials less energy. By contrast, the index for crude energy materials decreased 5.1 percent. (See table B.)

Crude foods: Prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs jumped 4.7 percent in August. From May to August, the crude foods index rose 6.0 percent subsequent to a 0.7-percent decline for the 3 months ended in May. The monthly increase in August was led by a 9.2-percent advance in the corn index. Higher prices for slaughter steers and heifers and for slaughter chickens also were factors in the rise in the crude foods index. (See table 2.)

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy rose 1.6 percent in August. For the 3 months ended in August, crude core prices advanced 3.4 percent after declining 0.4 percent from February to May. In August, over half of the monthly increase is attributable to a 9.3- percent rise in prices for gold ores. An advance in the corn index also was a significant factor in higher crude core prices.

Crude energy: Prices for crude energy materials fell 5.1 percent in August. From May to August, the crude energy materials index moved down 11.4 percent following a 2.2-percent decrease for the 3-month period ending in May. The August monthly decline in crude energy prices was the result of an 11.3-percent drop in the index for crude petroleum.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries moved up 1.6 percent in August, the largest increase since a 2.2-percent jump in January 2007. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) About one-third of the August advance can be traced to margins received by merchant wholesalers of durable goods, which moved up 2.3 percent. Higher margins received by gasoline stations and grocery stores also contributed to the rise in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries moved up 0.2 percent in August, the eleventh straight increase. The August advance is mostly attributable to a 3.0-percent rise in prices received by the scheduled passenger air transportation industry. Higher prices received by the industries for long- distance general freight trucking (less than truckload) and for Coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation also were factors in the rise in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries climbed 0.2 percent in August, the third consecutive increase. About one-fifth of the August advance can be traced to prices received by the commercial banking industry, which moved up 0.5 percent. Increases in the indexes for direct property and casualty insurance carriers and for non-casino hotels and motels also contributed to the advance in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 14, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 15, 2011Publication referenceSep 14, 201130 days laterOct 14, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.32%Observed 4.12%Observed −20 bps vs. earlier reference4.12%Observed Unchanged vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 14, 2011 – Dec 14, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 14, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.25%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 16, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jun 30, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · Jul 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.52% · Jul 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jul 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 4, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Aug 11, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Aug 18, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Aug 25, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Sep 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.01% · Sep 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Oct 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Oct 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.11% · Oct 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Nov 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Nov 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Dec 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Dec 8, 2011Jun 14, 2011Sep 14, 2011Dec 14, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,453.08/month

4.12% · Sep 8, 2011

At the later reference$1,453.08/month

4.12% · Oct 13, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is unchanged. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →