Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

September 2011 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods rose 0.8 percent in September, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Finished goods prices were unchanged in August and increased 0.2 percent in July. At the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods rose 0.8 percent in September, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Finished goods prices were unchanged in August and increased 0.2 percent in July. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods moved up 0.6 percent in September, and the crude goods index advanced 2.8 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods climbed 6.9 percent for the 12 months ended September 2011. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In September, the increase in the index for finished goods was broad based, with prices for finished energy goods rising 2.3 percent, the index for finished goods less foods and energy moving up 0.2 percent, and prices for finished consumer foods advancing 0.6 percent.

Finished energy: The index for finished energy goods advanced 2.3 percent in September after decreasing in each of the previous three months. Nearly seventy percent of this rise can be attributed to the gasoline index, which increased 4.2 percent. Higher prices for liquefied petroleum gas and diesel fuel also were factors in the rise in the finished energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent in September, the tenth straight increase. In September, one-third of the advance can be traced to prices for light motor trucks, which rose 0.6 percent. Higher prices for household detergents also contributed to the increase in the finished core index.

Finished foods: Prices for finished consumer foods climbed 0.6 percent in September, the fourth consecutive monthly increase. Accounting for over eighty percent of the September advance, prices for fresh and dry vegetables increased 10.0 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components climbed 0.6 percent in September after falling 0.5 percent in August. Over two-thirds of this broad-based advance can be traced to prices for intermediate energy goods, which rose 1.7 percent in September. The indexes for intermediate goods less foods and energy and for intermediate foods and feeds also contributed to the increase in intermediate goods prices, moving up 0.2 percent and 0.9 percent, respectively. For the 12 months ending September 2011, the intermediate goods index jumped 10.5 percent. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods increased 1.7 percent in September following a 2.3-percent drop in August. A major factor in this rise was the index for diesel fuel, which rose 7.3 percent. Higher prices for gasoline and liquefied petroleum gas also were significant contributors in the advance in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent in September after edging down 0.1 percent in August. Leading this increase, prices for primary basic organic chemicals rose 2.4 percent in September. An advance in the index for plastic resins and materials also contributed to higher intermediate core prices.

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds climbed 0.9 percent in September, the fourth straight advance. A 3.2-percent increase in prices for prepared animal feeds accounted for over eighty percent of the September rise in the intermediate foods index.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing moved up 2.8 percent in September. For the 3-month period ending in September, prices for crude materials advanced 1.8 percent following a 1.1-percent decrease from March to June. In September, the monthly increase in the crude goods index is mostly attributable to prices for crude energy materials, which jumped 7.7 percent. Also contributing to the September climb was the index for crude nonfood materials less energy, which advanced 1.0 percent. By contrast, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved down 0.9 percent. (See table B.)

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials rose 7.7 percent in September. From June to September, prices for crude energy materials declined 0.5 percent subsequent to a 5.1-percent decrease for the three months ending in June. The monthly advance in September was led by a 23.0-percent jump in the crude petroleum index. Higher prices for coal also were a factor in the rise in the crude energy index. (See table 2.)

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy rose 1.0 percent in September. For the 3 months ending in September, crude core prices advanced 3.3 percent after climbing 2.5 percent from March to June. In September, over eighty-five percent of the monthly increase is attributable to the gold ore index, which rose 8.4 percent. A rise in raw cotton prices also contributed to the advance in the crude core index.

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs fell 0.9 percent in September. From June to September, prices for crude foods moved up 2.9 percent following a 1.4-percent increase for the 3-month period ending in June. A major factor in the September monthly decrease was a 7.4-percent decline in the fluid milk index. Lower prices for slaughter hogs also contributed to the crude foods decrease.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries inched up 0.1 percent in September, the second consecutive increase. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading the September advance were margins received by clothing stores, which moved up 11.1 percent. Higher margins received by merchant wholesalers of nondurable goods and discount department stores also were factors in the rise in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries declined 0.9 percent in September after increasing in each of the last 11 months. Nearly all of the September decline can be traced to a 5.7-percent drop in the index for scheduled passenger air transportation. Lower prices for long-distance general freight trucking (truckload) and air transportation support activities also contributed to the decrease in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries edged up 0.1 percent in September, the fourth consecutive advance. The index for the commercial banking industry led the September increase, rising 1.5 percent. Higher prices received by offices of physicians and by non-casino hotels and motels also were factors in the advance in the index for total traditional service industries.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Oct 18, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierSep 18, 2011Publication referenceOct 18, 201130 days laterNov 17, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.09%Observed 4.12%Observed +3 bps vs. earlier reference4.00%Observed −12 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jul 18, 2011 – Jan 18, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Oct 18, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.25%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.52% · Jul 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jul 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 4, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Aug 11, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Aug 18, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Aug 25, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Sep 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.01% · Sep 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Oct 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Oct 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.11% · Oct 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Nov 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Nov 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Dec 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Dec 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Dec 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Dec 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Dec 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jan 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.89% · Jan 12, 2012Jul 18, 2011Oct 18, 2011Jan 18, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,453.08/month

4.12% · Oct 13, 2011

At the later reference$1,432.25/month

4.00% · Nov 17, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $20.83 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →