Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 2011 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods decreased 0.4 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This decline followed increases of 0.2 percent in May and 0.8 percent in April. At the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods decreased 0.4 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This decline followed increases of 0.2 percent in May and 0.8 percent in April. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods were unchanged in June, and the crude goods index moved down 0.6 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods climbed 7.0 percent for the 12 months ended June 2011. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In June, the decline in finished goods prices can be attributed to the index for finished energy goods, which decreased 2.8 percent. By contrast, prices for finished goods less foods and energy and for finished consumer foods moved up 0.3 percent and 0.6 percent, respectively.

Finished energy: The index for finished energy goods fell 2.8 percent in June, the largest drop since a 4.7-percent decrease in July 2009. In June, prices for gasoline moved down 4.7 percent and accounted for two-thirds of the monthly decline. Decreases in the indexes for residential electric power and liquefied petroleum gas also contributed to lower finished energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.3 percent in June, the seventh consecutive monthly advance. Almost half of the June rise can be traced to prices for light motor trucks, which increased 1.6 percent. An advance in the index for plastic products also was a factor in higher finished core prices.

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods rose 0.6 percent in June after falling 1.4 percent in the previous month. Accounting for almost sixty percent of this advance, prices for fresh fruits and melons increased 11.8 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components was unchanged in June following ten straight monthly increases. Price advances of 0.3 percent for intermediate goods less foods and energy and 0.4 percent for intermediate foods and feeds offset a 0.8- percent decline in the index for intermediate energy goods. On a 12-month basis, prices for intermediate goods climbed 11.0 percent, the largest increase since a 15.3-percent rise in September 2008. (See table B.)

Intermediate core: Prices for intermediate goods less foods and energy moved up 0.3 percent in June, the eleventh consecutive monthly advance. About two-thirds of the June increase can be traced to the index for basic organic chemicals, which rose 2.4 percent. Higher prices for plastic products and for agricultural chemicals and chemical products also contributed to the advance in intermediate core prices. (See table 2.)

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds turned up 0.4 percent in June following a 0.4-percent decline in May. Nearly three-quarters of this rise can be traced to prices for natural cheese (except cottage cheese), which climbed 6.0 percent. Higher prices for soybean cake and meal also were a factor in the advance in the intermediate foods index.

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods fell 0.8 percent in June, the first decline since July 2010. A major factor in the June decrease was the index for electric power, which fell 2.2 percent. Lower gasoline prices also contributed significantly to the decline in the intermediate energy goods index.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing fell 0.6 percent in June. For the 3 months ended in June, prices for crude materials declined 0.9 percent after rising 5.6 percent for the 3 months ended in March. In June, the monthly decrease in the crude goods index is attributable to prices for crude energy materials, which moved down 4.1 percent. By contrast, the indexes for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs and for crude nonfood materials less energy increased 2.1 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively. (See table B.)

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials declined 4.1 percent in June. From March to June, prices for crude energy materials fell 4.8 percent following a 0.9-percent advance from December to March. The monthly decrease in June was the result of an 8.0-percent drop in the crude petroleum index. (See table 2.)

Crude foods: Prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved up 2.1 percent in June. For the 3 months ended in June, the increase in the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs slowed to 1.5 percent after climbing 11.7 percent in the prior 3-month period. In June, about half of the monthly advance is attributable to a 19.6-percent jump in the fresh and dry vegetables index. Higher prices for fluid milk also were a major contributor to the rise in the crude foods index.

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy moved up 1.1 percent in June. From March to June, crude core prices advanced 2.8 percent following a 4.2-percent rise in the prior 3-month period. More than half of the monthly increase in June can be traced to the index for carbon steel scrap, which climbed 2.5 percent. Higher prices for corn also were a significant factor in the advance in the crude core index.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries was unchanged in June following four consecutive increases. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) In June, higher margins received by merchant wholesalers of durable goods and by food and beverage stores were offset by lower margins received by family clothing stores and merchant wholesalers of nondurable goods.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries moved up 0.4 percent in June, the ninth straight advance. One-quarter of the June increase can be traced to the index for couriers, which rose 1.0 percent. Higher prices received by line-haul railroads and by the long-distance general freight trucking industry group also contributed to the advance in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries rose 0.5 percent in June after moving down 0.2 percent in May. Accounting for about seventy percent of this advance, prices received by the depository credit intermediation industry group moved up 3.7 percent. Higher prices received by the industries for passenger car rental and for investment banking and securities dealing also were factors in the advance in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 14, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 14, 2011Publication referenceJul 14, 201130 days laterAug 13, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.49%Observed 4.51%Observed +2 bps vs. earlier reference4.32%Observed −19 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 14, 2011 – Oct 14, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 14, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.25%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.91% · Apr 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.80% · Apr 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · Apr 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · May 5, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.63% · May 12, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.61% · May 19, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · May 26, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jun 2, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Jun 9, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 16, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jun 30, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · Jul 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.52% · Jul 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jul 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 4, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Aug 11, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Aug 18, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Aug 25, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Sep 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.01% · Sep 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Oct 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Oct 13, 2011Apr 14, 2011Jul 14, 2011Oct 14, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,521.84/month

4.51% · Jul 14, 2011

At the later reference$1,488.14/month

4.32% · Aug 11, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $33.70 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →