Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

July 1996 U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes

The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.2 percent in July, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decrease, which followed declines of 1.1 percent in June and 0.6 percent in May, was due to a…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

-JULY 1996-

The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.2 percent in July, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decrease, which followed declines of 1.1 percent in June and 0.6 percent in May, was due to a continued decline in nonpetroleum import prices. The U.S. Export Price Index also fell in July, decreasing 0.5 percent after dipping 0.2 percent in June.

IMPORTS EXPORTS Month Non- Agri- Nonagri- All Petroleum petroleum All cultural cultural Imports Imports Imports Exports Exports Exports

Import Goods

Import prices continued to decrease, on average, in July despite a turnaround in petroleum prices. The petroleum index rose 1.5 percent in July after decreasing 9.6 percent over the previous two months. For the year ended in July, petroleum import prices rose 14.0 percent. In contrast, the index for nonpetroleum imports continued to decline in July, falling 0.4 percent, about the same as in each of the previous two months. Over the July 1995-96 period, the index for nonpetroleum imports dropped 2.0 percent, and it has not recorded a monthly increase since November, 1995.

The index for industrial supplies and materials, excluding petroleum, fell 0.8 percent in July after falling a monthly average of 0.6 percent over the preceding three months. Nonferrous metals, particularly copper, led the decline. The import index for foods, feeds, and beverages also fell in July, decreasing 1.2 percent after falling 2.7 percent in the previous month. Over the past 12 months the index has declined 3.3 percent. Import prices for capital goods, down 0.3 percent, fell for the sixth month in a row. Since January, the index has declined 2.8 percent. Consumer goods also fell in July, falling 0.2 percent after decreasing 0.3 percent in June.

In contrast, the index for automotive vehicles, parts, and engines rose 0.2 percent in July after posting modest declines in the previous two months.

Export Goods

Both agricultural and nonagricultural prices contributed to the decline in export prices of 0.5 percent in July. Prices for agricultural exports, which had registered large increases in the spring, were down 2.0 percent in July after falling 2.2 percent in June. The recent decline was largely attributable to falling grain prices. Despite the turnaround, agricultural export prices were up 13.7 percent for the year ended in July, about the same as posted for the July 1994-95 period.

Nonagricultural export prices resumed a downward trend in July, falling 0.3 percent after remaining basically unchanged over the previous three-month period. Over the past 12 months, the index was down 1.6 percent. Export prices for capital goods registered a significant turnaround in July, dropping 0.3 percent--due in large part to declining prices for computers, peripherals, and semiconductors--after advancing 0.4 percent in June. In addition, prices for nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials continued to decrease in July, falling 0.5 percent after recording a 0.3 percent decline in June. Over the past 12 months, the index has fallen 6.4 percent.

Prices for both automotives and consumer goods were unchanged in July after showing no change and a 0.1 percent advance, respectively, in June. For the year ended in July, the indexes for automotive vehicles and consumer goods were up 1.4 and 1.0 percent, respectively.

Imports by Locality of Origin

Import prices from Japan continued an eight-month downward trend, falling 0.4 percent in July. Over the past 12 months, the index has declined 4.6 percent. (See table 7.)

The price index of imports from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries also fell 0.4 percent in July, recording the fifth consecutive monthly decline in the index. For the July 1995-96 period, the index declined 2.0 percent.

Prices of imports from Canada decreased 0.5 percent last month after no change in June. The index was down 0.7 percent for the year.

In contrast, import prices from the European Union were unchanged in July, after falling 0.4 percent in June. For the year ended in July, the index was up 1.2 percent.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 21, 1996.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes

Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 22, 1996Publication referenceAug 21, 199630 days laterSep 20, 1996
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.23%Observed 7.88%Observed −35 bps vs. earlier reference8.14%Observed +26 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 21, 1996 – Nov 21, 1996
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 21, 1996Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.00%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 8.01% · May 24, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.03% · May 31, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.30% · Jun 7, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.39% · Jun 14, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.30% · Jun 21, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.29% · Jun 28, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.14% · Jul 5, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.42% · Jul 12, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Jul 19, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.19% · Jul 26, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Aug 2, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Aug 9, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Aug 16, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.93% · Aug 23, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.09% · Aug 30, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.34% · Sep 6, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.28% · Sep 13, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.14% · Sep 20, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Sep 27, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.06% · Oct 4, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.86% · Oct 11, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Oct 18, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.86% · Oct 25, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.78% · Nov 1, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.67% · Nov 8, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.59% · Nov 15, 1996May 21, 1996Aug 21, 1996Nov 21, 1996
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,176.25/month

7.88% · Aug 16, 1996

At the later reference$2,230.64/month

8.14% · Sep 20, 1996

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $54.39 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →