The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.5 percent in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decrease followed increases of 0.8 percent in April and 0.7 percent in March and largely reflected a…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics3 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
-MAY 1996-
The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.5 percent in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decrease followed increases of 0.8 percent in April and 0.7 percent in March and largely reflected a turnaround in petroleum prices. The U.S. Export Price Index increased 0.4 percent in May, following an increase of 0.5 percent in the previous month.
Import Goods
Price decreases for both petroleum and nonpetroleum imports contributed to the overall May decline for imports. Petroleum prices dropped 2.2 percent in May, a turnaround from the 17.5 percent increase over the previous two months. The petroleum index, which recorded large monthly fluctuations over the past 12 months, gained 10.0 percent for the year ended in May. After no change in April, nonpetroleum prices fell 0.3 percent in May, the same as in March. Nonpetroleum prices have dropped 0.8 percent over the past 12 months.
Prices for industrial supplies excluding petroleum led the decline for nonpetroleum imports, falling 0.7 percent in May, about the same as the previous month. For the year ended in May, this index dropped 1.1 percent. Declines also were recorded for all the finished goods indexes in May. Prices for capital goods dropped for the fourth consecutive month, falling 0.2 percent in May. Over the past four months, this index fell 1.8 percent, and it was down 2.8 percent for the year. Both the automotive vehicles and consumer goods indexes edged down 0.1 percent in May, after posting a 0.1 percent increase and no change in April, respectively.
In contrast, import prices for foods, feeds, and beverages were up in May, rising 0.4 percent. The increase for the index followed a 3.3 percent gain in April.
Export Goods
The May gain in export prices was attributable to continued increases for agricultural exports, up 3.1 percent. Led primarily by higher grain prices, the index for agricultural exports has risen 9.5 percent over the past three months and 24.8 percent for the year. For the second consecutive month, nonagricultural export prices declined 0.1 percent, after decreasing 0.3 percent in both March and February. The index was down 1.7 percent over the past 12 months.
Price declines for nonagricultural exports continued to be led by falling prices for nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials which decreased for the fourth consecutive month. The index for nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials fell 0.2 percent in May and 7.0 percent for the year. In addition, both capital and consumer goods prices fell in May, dropping 0.1 and 0.3 percent, respectively. The index for capital goods was unchanged in April and March, while the consumer goods index posted increases in each of the previous four months.
In contrast with the other finished goods areas, prices for automotive vehicles rose 0.2 percent in May after showing no change in April. For the year ended in May, the auto index gained 1.6 percent.
Imports by Locality of Origin
Prices of imports from Japan fell 0.3 percent in May, the same decline reported in each of the previous three months. The index, down 2.8 percent for the year, has declined for six consecutive months. (See table 7.)
The price of imports from the Asian Newly Industrialized countries also continued to decline in May, edging down 0.1 percent. Over the past 12 months, the index declined 0.9 percent.
The index for imports from Canada reversed in May, falling 0.7 percent after gaining 0.5 percent in April. The decrease was attributable to declines for both nonmanufactured goods, down 1.2 percent, and manufactured goods, down 0.5 percent. Overall, Canadian import prices rose a modest 0.4 percent for the year as gains for nonmanufactured goods were balanced by declining prices for manufactured goods.
The price index for imports from the European Union also fell, 0.3 percent, in May. Import prices from the European Union, however, were up 1.9 percent over the last 12 months.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes
Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Six months around publication
Mar 21, 1996 – Sep 21, 1996
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$2,264.35/month
8.30% · Jun 21, 1996
At the later reference$2,249.58/month
8.23% · Jul 19, 1996
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $14.77 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.