The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.2 percent in August, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. This was the fourth consecutive monthly decline and was attributable to falling prices for both…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics3 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
-AUGUST 1996-
The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.2 percent in August, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. This was the fourth consecutive monthly decline and was attributable to falling prices for both petroleum and nonpetroleum imports. The U.S. Export Price Index also fell in August, decreasing 0.1 percent, marking the third consecutive monthly decline.
Import Goods
The 0.2 percent decrease in August in the index for nonpetroleum import prices was the eighth monthly decline in the past year and brought the total 12-month drop to 2.2 percent. The downturn has paralleled the strong dollar and marked the largest 12-month decline in this component since the series was first published 10 years ago. Prices for imported petroleum dipped 0.2 percent in August after advancing 2.3 percent in July. For the year ended in August, the petroleum index was up 17.7 percent. Overall, import prices edged down 0.5 percent during the past 12 months.
Import prices for most major commodity groups continued to fall in August. The index for foods, feeds, and beverages, led primarily by falling coffee prices, dropped 0.8 percent in August, following declines of 1.3 percent in July and 2.7 percent in June. Import prices for capital goods fell 0.4 percent in August, about the same as the average monthly decline for the preceding six months. Over the past 12 months, the capital goods index has dropped 4.0 percent. Import prices for consumer goods and for industrial supplies and materials, excluding petroleum, posted more modest decreases, both down 0.1 percent in August. For the 12-month period, these indexes declined 0.4 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively.
In contrast, the index for automotive vehicles, parts, and engines was unchanged in August, after gaining 0.2 percent in the previous month, and was up a slight 0.3 percent for the year.
Export Goods
The dip in export prices in August was due to falling prices for both agricultural and nonagricultural goods. The index for agricultural exports continued to retreat from higher prices posted in the spring, edging down 0.2 percent in August after falling 4.1 percent over the previous two months. For the August 1995-96 period, however, the index rose 15.1 percent.
Nonagricultural export prices fell slightly for the second consecutive month (and ninth month in the past year), dropping 0.1 percent last month and 0.2 percent in July. For the year ended in August, the index declined 1.4 percent. Nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials continued to lead the decline, falling 0.5 percent in August, about the same as in the previous two months. Over the past 12 months, the index was down 6.1 percent.
In contrast, the indexes for finished goods posted no change or modest gains in August. Export prices for capital goods were unchanged in August after falling 0.3 percent in July. Prices for both automotive and consumer goods were up in August, 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively. Over the past 12 months, prices rose 1.5 percent for automotives and 1.1 percent for consumer goods.
Imports by Locality of Origin
Import prices from Japan fell for the ninth consecutive month, reflecting the relative strength of the dollar versus the yen. Over the past 12 months, the index has declined 4.5 percent. (See table 7.)
The price index of imports from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries also fell in August, the sixth consecutive monthly decline in the index. The 0.4 percent decrease in August followed a 0.5 percent decline in July. For the year ended in August, the index was down 2.4 percent.
Prices of imports from Canada, down 0.6 percent, fell for the fourth consecutive month. The index has declined 1.5 percent over the past year.
In contrast, import prices from the European Union rose 0.2 percent in August. For the past 12 months, the index was up 1.2 percent.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes
Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Six months around publication
Jun 24, 1996 – Dec 24, 1996
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$2,230.64/month
8.14% · Sep 20, 1996
At the later reference$2,176.25/month
7.88% · Oct 18, 1996
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $54.39 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.