Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2013 Third Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 3.0 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 4.7 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2013, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 3.0 percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 4.7 percent in output and 1.7 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the third quarter of 2012 to the third quarter of 2013, productivity increased 0.3 percent as output and hours worked rose 2.1 percent and 1.8 percent, respectively. (See table A.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers. Measures released today were based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses decreased 1.4 percent in the third quarter of 2013, while hourly compensation increased 1.6 percent. Unit labor costs rose 2.1 percent over the last four quarters. (See table A.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity declined 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2013, as output and hours worked increased 1.1 percent and 1.2 percent, respectively. Productivity increased 1.1 percent in the durable goods sector and decreased 1.0 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 2.2 percent, as output increased 2.3 percent and hours edged up 0.1 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing grew 1.3 percent in the third quarter of 2013 and declined 0.2 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 3.) Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity decreased 0.7 percent in the third quarter of 2013. (See table C.)

The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing and nonfinancial corporate output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.

Revised measures

The measures released today are based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Tables B and C present previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: nonfarm business, business, and manufacturing, as well as nonfinancial corporations.

In the third quarter of 2013, nonfarm business productivity increased 3.0 percent, rather than 1.9 percent as reported November 14; this is the largest increase in the quarterly series since a 4.7 percent gain in the fourth quarter of 2009. The upward revision to productivity reflected a 1.0 percentage point upward revision to output. Unit labor costs were revised down, and decreased 1.4 percent, as the upward revision to productivity was greater than an upward revision to hourly compensation. In the manufacturing sector, productivity declined 0.1 percent rather than increasing 0.4 percent as previously reported, reflecting a downward revision to output and an upward revision to hours worked. Unit labor costs increased 1.3 percent, the same as the preliminary estimate.

In the second quarter of 2013, nonfarm business productivity, output, and hours were unrevised. Unit labor costs increased 2.0 percent, rather than the previous estimate of 0.5 percent, the result of an upward revision to hourly compensation. In the manufacturing sector, output and productivity growth were both revised up by 0.1 percentage point. Unit labor costs increased 0.5 percent, a smaller increase than previously reported, due primarily to a downward revision to hourly compensation.

Second-quarter 2013 measures of productivity and costs were revised for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 3.3 percent rather than 2.4 percent as reported November 14. (See table C.)

Calendar year 2014 release dates for Productivity and Costs news releases are now available at http://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/prod2.htm.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2013

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2013

Percent change, annual rate, third quarter 2013

Percent change, annual rate, second quarter 2013

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Dec 16, 2013.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierNov 16, 2013Publication referenceDec 16, 201330 days laterJan 15, 2014
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.35%Observed 4.42%Observed +7 bps vs. earlier reference4.51%Observed +9 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Sep 16, 2013 – Mar 16, 2014
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Dec 16, 2013Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.50%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Sep 19, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 26, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Oct 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Oct 10, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.28% · Oct 17, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.13% · Oct 24, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 31, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.16% · Nov 7, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.35% · Nov 14, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Nov 21, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.29% · Nov 27, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Dec 5, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.42% · Dec 12, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.47% · Dec 19, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.48% · Dec 26, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.53% · Jan 2, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jan 9, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.41% · Jan 16, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Jan 23, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Jan 30, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Feb 6, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.28% · Feb 13, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.33% · Feb 20, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Feb 27, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.28% · Mar 6, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Mar 13, 2014Sep 16, 2013Dec 16, 2013Mar 16, 2014
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,505.83/month

4.42% · Dec 12, 2013

At the later reference$1,521.84/month

4.51% · Jan 9, 2014

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $16.01 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →