Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2013 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 3.7 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2013, Revised

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 3.7 percent in output and 1.4 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the second quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2013, productivity increased 0.3 percent as output and hours worked rose 2.1 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively. (See table A.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers. The measures released today were based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses were unchanged in the second quarter of 2013, as hourly compensation increased at the same 2.3 percent rate as productivity. Unit labor costs rose 1.5 percent over the last four quarters. (See table A.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity rose 1.9 percent in the second quarter of 2013, as output declined 0.6 percent and hours worked declined 2.4 percent. Productivity increased 3.3 percent in the durable goods sector and 0.2 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 1.9 percent, as output increased 1.9 percent and hours were unchanged. Unit labor costs in manufacturing rose 2.3 percent in the second quarter of 2013 and decreased 0.5 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 3.)

Preliminary second-quarter 2013 measures of productivity and costs were announced for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 3.2 percent in the second quarter of 2013, as output and hours rose 4.8 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively. Unit labor costs fell 0.9 percent, as the 2.3 percent gain in hourly compensation was less than the 3.2 percent gain in productivity. (See tables C and 6.)

The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing and nonfinancial corporate output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.

Revised measures

The measures released today are based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Tables B and C present previous and revised productivity and related measures for the major sectors: nonfarm business, business, and manufacturing, as well as nonfinancial corporations.

In the second quarter of 2013, nonfarm business productivity increased 2.3 percent, rather than 0.9 percent as reported August 16. The revised figure reflects both an upward revision to output and a downward revision to hours worked. Unit labor costs were revised down due solely to the upward revision to productivity. In the manufacturing sector, productivity growth was revised down due to a downward revision to output and an upward revision to hours. Due to the downward revision to productivity, unit labor costs increased more than previously reported, 2.3 percent.

In the first quarter of 2013, nonfarm business productivity was unrevised, and manufacturing productivity was revised down slightly from the August 16 release. In the nonfarm business sector, hourly compensation and unit labor costs decreased less than previously reported.

In the nonfinancial corporate sector, productivity, output, and unit labor costs were subject to revisions for the full period of these series, which begin in 1947. Measures of output and compensation for the nonfinancial corporate (NFC) sector now incorporate the revised National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) data released on July 31 and corrected on August 15 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. Hours were also revised for the NFC sector for 2001 forward, to include revised NIPA data on the proportion of sector compensation paid to employees of corporations and of nonprofit institutions. Also, all index measures for the NFC sector have been converted to a base year of 2009. A new base generally has little or no effect on percent changes. Historical revisions to measures for all other sectors due to the NIPA revision and BLS base year change were published with the August 16, 2013 release of Productivity and Costs.

In the first quarter of 2013, nonfinancial corporate sector productivity declined 4.1 percent, rather than increasing 0.3 percent as reported June 5. Unit labor costs declined 2.1 percent in the first quarter, compared to the 1.5 percent decrease published June 5.

Annual Average productivity growth for 2012 in the nonfinancial corporate sector was revised to 1.4 percent from 0.7 percent due to an upward revision to output. For the full series from 1947 to 2012, the average annual rate of growth is 2.4 percent, slightly higher than the 2.3 percent rate published June 5.

Revised quarterly and annual series for recent years for all sectors appear in tables 1-6. Revised annual indexes for the NFC sector for all years appear in appendix table 1. Full historical annual and quarterly measures can be found on the productivity and costs home page http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 5, 2013.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 6, 2013Publication referenceSep 5, 201330 days laterOct 5, 2013
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.39%Observed 4.57%Observed +18 bps vs. earlier reference4.22%Observed −35 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 5, 2013 – Dec 5, 2013
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 5, 2013Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.25%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jun 6, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jun 13, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.93% · Jun 20, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Jun 27, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.29% · Jul 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 11, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Jul 18, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.31% · Jul 25, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 1, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Aug 8, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Aug 15, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.58% · Aug 22, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Aug 29, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Sep 5, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Sep 12, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Sep 19, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 26, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Oct 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Oct 10, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.28% · Oct 17, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.13% · Oct 24, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 31, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.16% · Nov 7, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.35% · Nov 14, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Nov 21, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.29% · Nov 27, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Dec 5, 2013Jun 5, 2013Sep 5, 2013Dec 5, 2013
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,532.56/month

4.57% · Sep 5, 2013

At the later reference$1,470.56/month

4.22% · Oct 3, 2013

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $62.00 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →