Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2013 First Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 0.7 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 2.5 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2013, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 0.7 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 2.5 percent in output and 1.8 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the first quarter of 2012 to the first quarter of 2013, productivity increased 0.9 percent as output and hours worked increased 2.5 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively. (See table A.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses increased 0.5 percent in the first quarter of 2013, as an increase in hourly compensation was greater than the increase in productivity. Unit labor costs rose 0.6 percent over the last four quarters. (See table A.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity increased 3.8 percent in the first quarter of 2013, as output grew 5.6 percent and hours rose 1.7 percent. Output growth was robust in both manufacturing subsectors, while virtually all hours growth occurred in durable manufacturing. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing sector productivity increased 1.7 percent as output and hours worked rose 2.6 percent and 0.9 percent, respectively. Unit labor costs in manufacturing decreased 0.5 percent in the first quarter of 2013 and increased 1.6 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 3.)

Preliminary fourth quarter and annual 2012 measures were announced today for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 2.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012 and edged up 0.1 percent over the last four quarters. Annual average productivity increased 0.5 percent from 2011 to 2012. (See tables C and 6).

The concepts, sources, and methods underlying manufacturing output and nonfinancial corporate output measures differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.

Revised measures

Revised measures of real hourly compensation for all sectors, from 2008 onward, reflect revisions in the consumer price series based on new and revised data from the BLS Office of Prices and Living Conditions. Output data for the manufacturing sector incorporate historically revised indexes of industrial production published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on March 22. These revisions affected quarterly manufacturing output, productivity, and unit labor cost measures for the data series beginning in 1987 and recent annual measures. Full historical annual and quarterly measures are available on the labor productivity and costs home page: http://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, nonfarm business sector productivity declined 1.7 percent, a slightly smaller decline than reported March 7. Unit labor costs rose 4.4 percent, less than previously reported. Manufacturing sector productivity rose 2.2 percent in the fourth quarter reflecting a small upward revision to output. Unit labor costs in the manufacturing sector decreased slightly less than previously reported, as the upward revision of hourly compensation was more than that of productivity. (See table B.)

2012 Annual Average measures for productivity and unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector were virtually unrevised from the March 7 release. In the manufacturing sector, a small downward revision to output led to a downward revision to productivity and an upward revision to unit labor costs. (See table B.)

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2012

Percent change, annual average 2012

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2012

Percent change, annual average 2012

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 2, 2013.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 2, 2013Publication referenceMay 2, 201330 days laterJun 1, 2013
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.57%Observed 3.35%Observed −22 bps vs. earlier reference3.81%Observed +46 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 2, 2013 – Aug 2, 2013
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 2, 2013Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%4.00%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Feb 7, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Feb 14, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Feb 21, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.51% · Feb 28, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.52% · Mar 7, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.63% · Mar 14, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.54% · Mar 21, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.57% · Mar 28, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.54% · Apr 4, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.43% · Apr 11, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.41% · Apr 18, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Apr 25, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.35% · May 2, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.42% · May 9, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.51% · May 16, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · May 23, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.81% · May 30, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jun 6, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jun 13, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.93% · Jun 20, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Jun 27, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.29% · Jul 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 11, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Jul 18, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.31% · Jul 25, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 1, 2013Feb 2, 2013May 2, 2013Aug 2, 2013
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,322.14/month

3.35% · May 2, 2013

At the later reference$1,399.58/month

3.81% · May 30, 2013

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $77.44 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →