Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2005 Third Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2005. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2005, preliminary

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2005. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

4.8 percent in the business sector and 4.1 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

Productivity increased 4.8 percent in the business sector, as output grew 4.3 percent and hours declined 0.4 percent. The 4.1-percent rise in nonfarm business productivity occurred as output rose 4.2 percent and hours rose 0.1 percent (table A).

The effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which struck the Gulf Coast during the third quarter, could not be separately identified in the productivity and costs measures. The measures reported in this news release reflect both these effects and ongoing trends in ouput, hours, and compensation.

In manufacturing, productivity increases in the third quarter were:

4.5 percent in manufacturing, 7.5 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 1.7 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The third-quarter increase in manufacturing productivity followed a 3.6- percent increase in the second quarter of 2005. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 13 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the second quarter to the third quarter of 2005, productivity in the business sector grew at a 4.8 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate. Output increased 4.3 percent, while hours of all persons engaged in the sector declined 0.4 percent. The third-quarter productivity increase was much faster than the 0.8-percent gain recorded in the second quarter of 2005 (as revised), which reflected a 4.0-percent rise in output and a 3.1-percent rise in hours. (tables B and 1).

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased at an annual rate of 4.2 percent during the third quarter of 2005, faster than the 3.0-percent rise one quarter earlier ( as revised). This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, fell by 0.9 percent in the third quarter of 2005 after falling by 1.1 percent in the second quarter. It had increased 2.3 percent in the first quarter of the year.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, declined 0.6 percent during the third quarter. By contrast, this measure had increased 2.2 percent in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for the business sector increased 3.0 percent during the third quarter of 2005, following a 2.6 percent increase in the previous quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector grew 4.1 percent during the third quarter of 2005 as output grew 4.2 percent. Hours of all persons in the nonfarm business sector edged up 0.1 percent, reflecting a 0.4-percent gain in employment and a 0.4-percent decline in average weekly hours at work. In the previous quarter, nonfarm business productivity increased 2.1 percent, as output grew 4.4 percent and hours worked increased by 2.2 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.6 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2005. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation fell 1.4 percent during the July-September period. During the second quarter of 2005, real hourly compensation had declined 0.1 percent.

Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector fell 0.5 percent during the third quarter of 2005, after rising 1.8 percent in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 3.3 percent in the third quarter of 2005.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 4.5 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2005 as output grew 3.1 percent and hours of all persons fell 1.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In durable goods industries, productivity and output both grew 7.5 percent in the third quarter while hours of all persons were unchanged. Productivity increased 1.7 percent in nondurable goods, where output fell 2.1 percent but hours fell faster, 3.7 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

The hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased an average of 2.9 percent during the third quarter of 2005, reflecting increases of 2.4 percent in durable goods and 3.4 percent in nondurable goods. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation in total manufacturing fell 2.1 percent in the third quarter. Real hourly compensation had grown in the first two quarters of 2005; 3.6 percent in the second quarter (as revised) and 4.6 percent in the first quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 1.6 percent in the third quarter of 2005, after rising in each of the previous four quarters. In the durable goods sector, unit labor costs fell 4.7 percent in the third quarter after increasing 4.0 percent one quarter earlier. In the nondurable goods sector, unit labor costs rose 1.7 percent in the third quarter and 4.0 percent in the second quarter of 2005.

Revised Measures

Revised and previous measures for the second quarter of 2005 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. Hours data for the second quarter now reflect more current data on the ratio of hours worked to hours paid in private nonfarm businesses.

In the business sector, productivity, output, and hours grew about the same as reported on Sept. 7, based on information then available. In the nonfarm sector, growth in productivity and output was revised up while the increase in hours remained the same. Productivity was unchanged in the manufacturing sector, reflecting offsetting small upward revisions to output and hours. In all three sectors, hourly compensation and unit labor costs were revised down.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for nonfinancial corporations for the second quarter of 2005 also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on Sept. 7.

Second quarter 2005

Productivity grew at an annual rate of 6.3 percent in second-quarter 2005, compared with the increase of 6.8 percent reported previously. This was the result of a downward revision in output growth, from 9.5 percent to 9.0 percent, as hours growth was unchanged. Unit labor costs fell more slowly than reported previously, as hourly compensation was revised down less than productivity. Unit profits increased slightly less than reported on Sept. 7. (tables C and 6).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 3, 2005.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 4, 2005Publication referenceNov 3, 200530 days laterDec 3, 2005
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.91%Observed 6.31%Observed +40 bps vs. earlier reference6.26%Observed −5 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 3, 2005 – Feb 3, 2006
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 3, 2005Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.00%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Aug 4, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.89% · Aug 11, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.80% · Aug 18, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Aug 25, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.71% · Sep 1, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.71% · Sep 8, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.74% · Sep 15, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.80% · Sep 22, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Sep 29, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 6, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Oct 13, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.10% · Oct 20, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 27, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Nov 3, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.36% · Nov 10, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.37% · Nov 17, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.28% · Nov 23, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.26% · Dec 1, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.32% · Dec 8, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.30% · Dec 15, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.26% · Dec 22, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Dec 29, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.21% · Jan 5, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Jan 12, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.10% · Jan 19, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.12% · Jan 26, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.23% · Feb 2, 2006Aug 3, 2005Nov 3, 2005Feb 3, 2006
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,858.87/month

6.31% · Nov 3, 2005

At the later reference$1,849.10/month

6.26% · Dec 1, 2005

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $9.77 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →