Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2005 Second Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 2005. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 2005, revised

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 2005. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the second quarter were:

0.7 percent in the business sector and 1.8 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, increases in productivity were smaller than reported on Aug. 9, as output was revised down and hours were revised up. (See table C.)

In manufacturing, the revised productivity changes in the second quarter were:

3.6 percent in manufacturing, 3.3 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 4.4 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

In total manufacturing, the change in productivity was revised down from a preliminary estimate of 4.1 percent. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 13 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Second-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5; the differences between these measures and the preliminary second-quarter figures issued on Aug. 9 are shown in table C.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the first quarter to the second quarter of 2005, productivity in the business sector grew 0.7 percent as output increased 4.0 percent and hours worked by all persons engaged in the sector--employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers-- rose 3.2 percent (tables A and 1). The productivity increase is less than those posted for the previous five quarters; it is the smallest increase since a 0.3-percent rise was posted in the fourth quarter of 2003 (seasonally adjusted annual rates).

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased 3.3 percent in the second quarter of 2005 and 4.7 percent one quarter earlier (as revised). Hourly compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, fell 0.8 percent in the second quarter of 2005 after growing by 2.3 percent in the first quarter of the year.

Unit labor costs rose 2.6 percent in the second quarter of 2005. Although hourly compensation rose more in the first quarter 2005 than in the second quarter, the larger increase in labor productivity in the first quarter offset more of the increase in labor costs and unit labor costs in the first quarter grew more slowly, 1.7 percent, than the 2.6-percent increase in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for the business sector rose 2.4 percent in the second quarter and 2.7 percent in the first quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector grew at a 1.8 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2005, reflecting increases of 4.1 percent in output and 2.2 percent in hours of all persons (tables A and 2). The second quarter increase was one of the smaller increases posted in the nonfarm business sector since the business-cycle peak in the first quarter of 2001; productivity growth over the period has risen at an average annual rate of 3.5 percent.

Hourly compensation rose 4.4 percent in the second quarter of 2005, following a 5.5 percent advance in the first quarter. When the rise in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation edged up 0.2 percent in the second quarter of 2005.

Unit labor costs increased 2.5 percent in the second quarter of 2005, somewhat more than the 2.2-percent increase posted in the first quarter of the year. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 2.4 percent in the second quarter of 2005 and 3.0 percent one quarter earlier.

Manufacturing

In the second quarter of 2005, productivity increased 3.6 percent in manufacturing, as output increased 0.8 percent and hours of all persons fell 2.7 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the durable goods sector, productivity grew 3.3 percent in the second quarter of 2005, reflecting an increase in output of 1.5 percent and a drop in hours of 1.8 percent. In nondurable goods, output per hour rose 4.4 percent as output was unchanged and hours declined 4.2 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5). Hours of all persons in the nondurable manufacturing sector have declined in every quarter since the third quarter of 1999.

The hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 8.4 percent during the second quarter of 2005, reflecting an 8.2-percent rise in hourly compensation in durable goods industries and an 8.6-percent increase in the nondurable goods sector. Real hourly compensation in the total manufacturing sector rose 4.1 in the second quarter and 4.6 percent one quarter earlier.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 4.7 percent in the second quarter of 2005, more than they had in the first quarter, when they rose 2.8 percent. Unit labor costs grew 4.8 percent in durable goods and 4.0 percent in nondurable goods in the second quarter of 2005.

Nonfinancial corporations

Preliminary second quarter 2005 measures of productivity and costs were reported today for nonfinancial corporations (tables B and 6). Productivity increased 6.8 percent during the second quarter, reflecting a 9.5-percent rise in output and 2.6 percent growth in employee hours (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the first quarter of 2005, output per hour rose 2.7 percent (as revised), reflecting increases of 3.3 percent in output and 0.5 percent in employee hours. Nonfinancial corporations include all corporations doing business in the United States except those classified as offices in the finance and insurance sector, offices of bank holding companies, or offices of other holding companies.

Hourly compensation rose 4.0 percent in the second quarter of 2005, following a 5.9 percent gain in the first quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation was little changed in the second quarter and rose 3.5 percent one quarter earlier.

Unit labor costs for nonfinancial corporations dropped 2.6 percent in the second quarter after increasing by 3.1 percent in the first quarter. Unit profits grew 43.2 percent in second quarter, 2005, the largest one- quarter increase since a 51.0 percent rise in the fourth quarter of 2002. The implicit price deflator for nonfinancial corporate output rose 1.3 percent in the second quarter of 2005.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the second quarter of 2005 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. The quarterly movements differ from those reported on Aug. 9 based on information then available. In the business and nonfarm business sectors and the manufacturing sector, productivity and output were revised down and hours of all persons were revised up. Hourly compensation and unit labor costs in all of these sectors were revised up.

Hourly compensation growth in the first quarter also was revised to reflect new estimates of compensation. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, hourly compensation grew more slowly in the first quarter than reported in August. As a result, unit labor costs in these sectors now grow less than previously reported. In the manufacturing sector, hourly compensation data for the first quarter are similar to those reported earlier.

Revised Measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Data for the first quarter of 2005 were revised for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity, output, hourly compensation, and unit labor costs grew more slowly than reported on August 9.

First quarter 2005

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Sep 7, 2005.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierAug 8, 2005Publication referenceSep 7, 200530 days laterOct 7, 2005
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.82%Observed 5.71%Observed −11 bps vs. earlier reference5.98%Observed +27 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jun 7, 2005 – Dec 7, 2005
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Sep 7, 2005Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.00%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.56% · Jun 9, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.63% · Jun 16, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.57% · Jun 23, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.53% · Jun 30, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.62% · Jul 7, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.66% · Jul 14, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.73% · Jul 21, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Jul 28, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Aug 4, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.89% · Aug 11, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.80% · Aug 18, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Aug 25, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.71% · Sep 1, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.71% · Sep 8, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.74% · Sep 15, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.80% · Sep 22, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Sep 29, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 6, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Oct 13, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.10% · Oct 20, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 27, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Nov 3, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.36% · Nov 10, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.37% · Nov 17, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.28% · Nov 23, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 6.26% · Dec 1, 2005Jun 7, 2005Sep 7, 2005Dec 7, 2005
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,743.10/month

5.71% · Sep 1, 2005

At the later reference$1,794.80/month

5.98% · Oct 6, 2005

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $51.69 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →