Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2003 First Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2003. The revised seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2003

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2003. The revised seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the first quarter were:

2.5 percent in the business sector and 1.9 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, the first-quarter productivity gains were somewhat higher than those reported initially on May 1.

In manufacturing, the revised productivity changes in the first quarter were: 1.9 percent in manufacturing, 2.1 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 2.2 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Manufacturing productivity growth was revised down from the figure reported on May 1, reflecting a downward revision to productivity growth in durable goods manufacturing--which comprises about sixty percent of employment in the sector. Productivity in nondurable goods manufacturing was revised up. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 15 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. First-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

Productivity increased 2.5 percent in the business sector (seasonally adjusted annual rate) from the fourth quarter of 2002 to the first quarter of 2003, as output increased 2.0 percent and hours worked by all persons decreased 0.5 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 3.8 percent during the first quarter of 2003. This measure of compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, was unchanged.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in hourly compensation and productivity, rose 1.3 percent during the first quarter of 2003. The change in unit labor costs usually approximates the change in hourly compensation less the change in productivity. The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in both unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, grew by 1.7 percent from the fourth quarter of 2002 to the first quarter of 2003.

Nonfarm business

Productivity rose 1.9 percent in the nonfarm business sector during the first quarter of 2003, reflecting a 1.8-percent rise in output and a 0.1- percent decrease in working hours of all persons. Hours worked in the nonfarm business sector now have declined in 10 of the last 12 quarters (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased 3.4 percent in the first quarter of 2003. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation fell 0.4 percent in the first quarter.

Unit labor costs grew 1.5 percent during the first quarter of 2003. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output also rose by 1.5 percent.

Manufacturing

Productivity rose 1.9 percent in manufacturing in the first quarter of 2003, as output decreased 0.7 percent and working hours of all persons declined 2.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In durable goods industries, productivity grew 2.1 percent, as output edged up by 0.1 percent and hours fell 2.0 percent. In nondurable goods industries, productivity rose 2.2 percent, as output dropped 1.2 percent and hours declined by 3.4 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation in manufacturing rose 4.5 percent during the first quarter. This increase reflects a rise of 4.3 percent in the hourly compensation of persons in durable goods industries and a larger increase, 4.8 percent, in the hourly compensation of workers in nondurable goods industries. Real hourly compensation, which takes account of changes in consumer prices, rose 0.7 percent for all manufacturing workers.

Unit labor costs rose 2.6 percent in manufacturing during the first quarter. In durable goods industries, unit labor costs grew 2.1 percent. In nondurable goods industries, unit labor costs rose 2.5 percent last quarter.

Nonfinancial corporations

Preliminary first-quarter 2003 measures of productivity and costs for nonfinancial corporations also were announced today (tables B and 6). Productivity rose 2.9 percent in the first quarter, less than the 5.0-percent rise recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002. Output increased 2.4 percent in first quarter 2003, while employee-hours declined 0.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This marked the 10th consecutive decline in hours of nonfinancial corporate employees. Nonfinancial corporations include all corporations doing business in the United States, except banks, stock and com modity brokers, and finance and insurance agencies.

Hourly compensation increased 4.7 percent during the first quarter of 2003. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 0.8 percent in the first quarter. Unit labor costs in nonfinancial corporations rose 1.7 percent in the first quarter, after falling in the previous seven quarters.

Unit profits grew 2.2 percent in first quarter 2003, less than the 20.8- percent climb in the fourth quarter of 2002. The implicit price deflator for nonfinancial corporate output increased 1.0 percent in the first quarter of 2003.

REVISED MEASURES

Current and previous measures for the first quarter of 2003 for business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing are compared in table C. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, output and productivity were revised up from the data reported on May 1, based on information then available. Unit labor costs were revised downward. In the manufacturing sector, productivity, output, and hourly compensation all were revised down. Because hourly compensation was revised down by more than productivity, unit labor costs also were revised down.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jun 4, 2003.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierMay 5, 2003Publication referenceJun 4, 200330 days laterJul 4, 2003
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.70%Observed 5.31%Observed −39 bps vs. earlier reference5.40%Observed +9 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Mar 4, 2003 – Sep 4, 2003
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jun 4, 2003Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.00%5.75%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Mar 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.61% · Mar 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Mar 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Mar 28, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Apr 4, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Apr 11, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Apr 18, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Apr 25, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.70% · May 2, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.62% · May 9, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.45% · May 16, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.34% · May 23, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.31% · May 30, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.26% · Jun 6, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 13, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 20, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.24% · Jun 27, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.40% · Jul 4, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.52% · Jul 11, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Jul 18, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Jul 25, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.14% · Aug 1, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Aug 8, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Aug 15, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.28% · Aug 22, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.32% · Aug 29, 2003Mar 4, 2003Jun 4, 2003Sep 4, 2003
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,667.78/month

5.31% · May 30, 2003

At the later reference$1,684.59/month

5.40% · Jul 4, 2003

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $16.81 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →