Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2003 First Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2003. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2003

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2003. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the first quarter were:

2.2 percent in the business sector and 1.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

These productivity increases occurred as modest output increases were combined with modest declines in the hours worked. In the business sector, output grew 1.7 percent and hours of all persons fell 0.5 percent. In nonfarm businesses, output rose 1.4 percent and hours dropped 0.1 percent. First-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

In manufacturing, productivity changes in the first quarter were:

2.1 percent in manufacturing, 2.4 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 1.7 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Productivity growth in manufacturing in the first quarter of 2003 reflected decreases in both output and hours; output declined 0.6 percent and hours of all persons fell 2.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 15 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

Productivity in the business sector increased 2.2 percent between the fourth quarter 2002 and the first quarter 2003, as output grew 1.7 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector dropped 0.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Revised data for the fourth quarter of 2002 show that output per hour increased 0.3 percent, reflecting a 1.7- percent rise in output and a 1.5-percent increase in hours at work. (See table 1.)

Hourly compensation increased 3.9 percent during the first quarter of 2003. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Hourly compensation had risen 3.6 percent in the previous quarter. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 0.1 percent in the first quarter of 2003, less than the 1.6-percent increase in the fourth quarter of 2002.

Unit labor costs rose 1.7 percent in the first quarter of 2003, down from the 3.3-percent increase in the fourth quarter. Unit labor costs grew noticeably slower in the first quarter than in the fourth quarter because the higher growth in productivity was more than enough to offset the larger increase in hourly compensation. Growth in unit labor costs is roughly equivalent to the change in hourly compensation less the change in output per hour.

The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes in both unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, rose 1.8 percent in the first quarter. The implicit price deflator rose 1.5 percent in the final quarter of 2002.

Nonfarm business

Productivity rose 1.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector in first- quarter 2003, as output increased 1.4 percent and hours of all persons decreased 0.1 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the fourth quarter of 2002, productivity had increased 0.7 percent, as output rose 1.7 percent and hours increased by 0.9 percent. (See table 2.)

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.5 percent annual rate in the first quarter of 2003, down from the 3.9-percent increase in the fourth quarter. When the rise in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation fell 0.3 percent in the first quarter; it had increased 1.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 2002.

Unit labor costs grew 1.9 percent in the first quarter of 2003 and 3.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2002. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.7 percent in the first quarter and 1.4 percent one quarter earlier.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 2.1 percent in manufacturing in the first quarter of 2003, as output decreased 0.6 percent and hours of all persons declined 2.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Both output and hours also had fallen in fourth-quarter 2002--by 3.7 and 3.2 percent, respectively--and productivity declined 0.5 percent. In the first quarter of 2003, productivity grew 2.4 percent in durable goods manufacturing, where output increased 0.3 percent and hours fell 2.0 percent. Nondurable goods manufacturing productivity rose 1.7 percent, reflecting a 1.7 percent drop in output and a 3.3 percent decline in hours of all persons.

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers rose 4.8 percent during the first quarter, and real hourly compensation increased 1.0 percent. The hourly compensation of workers in durable goods manufacturing rose 4.5 percent, while that of employees in nondurable goods manufacturing grew 5.2 percent.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing rose 2.7 percent in the first quarter of 2003, as unit labor costs of durable goods producers increased 2.1 percent and those of nondurable goods producers increased more, 3.4 percent.

Fourth-quarter and annual measures for nonfinancial corporations

Fourth-quarter and annual 2002 measures of productivity and costs also were announced today for the nonfinancial corporate sector (tables B, C, and 6). Output per all-employee hour grew 5.0 percent from the third to the fourth quarter of 2002, as output grew 4.5 percent and employee hours fell 0.5 percent. The nonfinancial corporate sector includes all corporations doing business in the United States, except those classified as depository institutions, nondepository institutions, security and commodity brokers, insurance carriers, regulated investment offices, small business investment offices, and real estate investment trusts.

Hourly compensation increased 4.9 percent in the fourth quarter, and real hourly compensation rose 2.8 percent. Unit labor costs fell 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2002--the seventh consecutive drop in these costs. In the fourth quarter, unit profits increased at a 20.8 percent annual rate after falling 11.2 percent in the previous quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfinancial corporate output grew 0.9 percent during the fourth quarter of 2002, compared with a 0.5 percent decrease in the third quarter.

Productivity grew 5.5 percent in calendar year 2002 for nonfinancial corporations, following an increase of 1.4 percent in the previous year. (See table C.) Nonfinancial corporate output grew 3.2 percent in 2002, and employee hours decreased 2.2 percent. This was the second consecutive decrease in employee hours.

Hourly compensation grew 3.3 percent in 2002, and real hourly compensation increased 1.7 percent. Total unit costs fell 1.3 percent, reflecting a 2.1 decrease in unit labor costs and a 0.9 percent rise in unit nonlabor costs. Unit profits rose 9.0 percent in 2002, the first annual increase since a 3.1-percent rise in 1997. The implicit price deflator, which reflects both the unit costs and unit profits measures, dropped 0.5 percent in 2002.

Revised measures

Current and previous measures for the third and fourth quarters of 2002 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table D. Some of the quarterly movements differ from those reported on March 6. Hourly compensation, real hourly compensation, and unit labor costs in the business and nonfarm business sectors were revised down. In manufacturing, fourth quarter output and productivity were revised down while unit labor costs were revised up.

For third-quarter 2002, hourly compensation was revised down sharply in the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors; unit labor costs were revised down accordingly. Unit labor costs in the business and nonfarm business sectors now show declines of 3.4 percent in the third quarter. In the manufacturing sector, unit labor costs dropped 3.9 percent in the third quarter compared to the 0.1-percent increase reported on March 6.

The Consumer Price Index Research Series has been updated. This affected indexes of real hourly compensation for all years.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for nonfinancial corporations for the third quarter of 2002 also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on March 6. Productivity and output in this sector were revised down for the third quarter of 2002. Productivity grew at an annual rate of 3.4 percent, compared with the increase of 5.5 percent published March 6. Hourly compensation was revised down more than output per hour, so unit labor costs fell 0.5 percent, rather than increasing. (See tables E and 6.)

Third quarter 2002

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 1, 2003.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 1, 2003Publication referenceMay 1, 200330 days laterMay 31, 2003
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.91%Observed 5.79%Observed −12 bps vs. earlier reference5.31%Observed −48 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 1, 2003 – Aug 1, 2003
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 1, 2003Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.00%5.75%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.88% · Feb 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.86% · Feb 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.84% · Feb 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Feb 28, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Mar 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.61% · Mar 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Mar 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Mar 28, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Apr 4, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Apr 11, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Apr 18, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Apr 25, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.70% · May 2, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.62% · May 9, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.45% · May 16, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.34% · May 23, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.31% · May 30, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.26% · Jun 6, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 13, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 20, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.24% · Jun 27, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.40% · Jul 4, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.52% · Jul 11, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Jul 18, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Jul 25, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.14% · Aug 1, 2003Feb 1, 2003May 1, 2003Aug 1, 2003
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,758.35/month

5.79% · Apr 25, 2003

At the later reference$1,667.78/month

5.31% · May 30, 2003

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $90.57 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →