Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

1997 Second Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 1997. The preliminary seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Second Quarter 1997

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the second quarter of 1997. The preliminary seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the second quarter were:

0.7 percent in the business sector, and 0.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity growth in the second quarter was slower than in the first quarter, as the increases in both output and hours slowed. In the first quarter of 1997, output per hour of all persons (as revised) rose 1.8 percent in the business sector and 1.4 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In manufacturing, productivity changes in the second quarter were:

3.2 percent in manufacturing, 5.1 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 0.9 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The second-quarter increase in manufacturing productivity was the result of a 4.4 percent increase in output and a 1.2 percent rise in hours of all persons. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 18 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Second-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information.

Business

From the first to the second quarter of 1997, business sector productivity increased at a 0.7 percent annual rate, as output rose 2.4 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector rose 1.7 percent. The second-quarter increase in labor productivity was smaller than those recorded in the previous two quarters. In the first quarter, productivity had increased 1.8 percent as output increased 5.9 percent and hours rose 4.0 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 3.0 percent in the second quarter and 4.4 percent in the first quarter of 1997. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 2.3 percent annual rate during the second quarter, similar to the 2.5 percent increase posted during the first quarter.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), increased at a 1.9 percent annual rate in both the first and second quarters of 1997, after falling 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 1996. The first- and second- quarter increases in real hourly compensation were the largest since a 5.0 percent rise in the first quarter of 1992.

The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased 1.1 percent in the second quarter. This increase was smaller than the 2.0 percent rise in the first quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 0.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector during the second quarter of 1997, compared with a 1.4 percent increase in the first quarter (table 2). Output grew more slowly in the second quarter, 2.3 percent, than during the first quarter of the year, when it grew 5.6 percent. Hours of all persons in the nonfarm business sector increased 1.7 percent in the second quarter, much less than the 4.2 percent increase registered during the previous quarter.

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.1 percent annual rate in the second quarter, down from the 4.5 percent rise posted one quarter earlier. However, when the rise in the CPI-U is taken into account, increases in real hourly compensation for the first and second quarters of the year were about the same--2.0 percent in the second quarter and 2.1 percent in the first quarter. As in the larger business sector, the increases in real hourly compensation during the first two quarters of 1997 are the largest since the first quarter of 1992, when real hourly compensation rose 4.8 percent.

Unit labor costs grew 2.4 percent in the second quarter, down from the 3.1 percent increase posted in the previous quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 0.9 percent in the second quarter and 2.4 percent in the first quarter of 1997.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 3.2 percent in manufacturing, as output rose 4.4 percent and hours of all persons rose 1.2 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the first quarter, productivity increased 2.5 percent, as output rose 5.4 percent and hours increased 2.8 percent (table 3). Labor productivity in manufacturing has risen in every quarter since the third quarter of 1993, when it fell 0.2 percent. In durable goods, productivity increased 5.1 in the second quarter of 1997, up from the 3.0 percent increase posted in the first quarter. In nondurable goods manufacturing, productivity rose 0.9 percent in the second quarter and 2.7 percent in the first quarter. The second-quarter increase in nondurables was the smallest since a 0.9 percent drop in the third quarter of 1994 (tables 4 and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 2.7 percent during the second quarter, less than the 4.4 percent increase in the first quarter. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 1.6 percent in the second quarter, somewhat less than the 2.0 percent increase in the previous period.

Unit labor costs fell at a 0.4 percent annual rate in the second quarter after rising 1.8 percent one quarter earlier. In durable goods manufacturing, unit labor costs fell 2.7 percent in the second quarter after rising 1.7 percent during the first quarter of 1997. In nondurable goods manufacturing, unit labor costs rose 2.5 percent during the second quarter, up from the 0.7 percent increase of the first quarter.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the first quarter of 1997 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, increases in productivity, output, and hourly compensation are smaller--and increases in unit labor costs are higher--than reported on June 18, based on information then available. In manufacturing, productivity and output increased slightly less than originally reported.

Output measures for the business, nonfarm business, and nonfinancial corporate sectors and compensation measures for all sectors incorporate the revisions of the national income and product accounts produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce (BEA 97-23). These revisions extend back to the first quarter of 1993. Appendix tables 1-6 present quarterly and annual measures for 1992-94. Output measures for the manufacturing, durable manufacturing, and nondurable manufacturing sectors were revised back to 1949 to incorporate the following: revised 1994 and newly available 1995 shipments data from the Annual Survey of Manufactures published by the Census Bureau; revised inventory data from BEA for 1949-95; and the incorporation of new annual-weighted deflators, for detailed industry outputs, for 1987-95 from BEA. Appendix tables 7-9 contain revised annual indexes for these three sectors.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for the first quarter for nonfinancial corporations also were revised to incorporate the most recent information from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The revised data for the first quarter show that productivity, output, hourly compensation, and unit profits grew more slowly than reported on June 18. Growth in unit labor costs and the implicit price deflator were higher than reported in June, based on information then available (table C).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 12, 1997.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 13, 1997Publication referenceAug 12, 199730 days laterSep 11, 1997
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.47%Observed 7.46%Observed −1 bps vs. earlier reference7.53%Observed +7 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 12, 1997 – Nov 12, 1997
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 12, 1997Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.00%7.50%8.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.91% · May 16, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.92% · May 23, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · May 30, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jun 6, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.72% · Jun 13, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.61% · Jun 20, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.58% · Jun 27, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.62% · Jul 4, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.47% · Jul 11, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.47% · Jul 18, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.43% · Jul 25, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.36% · Aug 1, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.46% · Aug 8, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.54% · Aug 15, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.46% · Aug 22, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.58% · Aug 29, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.53% · Sep 5, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.53% · Sep 12, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.38% · Sep 19, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.28% · Sep 26, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.31% · Oct 3, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.26% · Oct 10, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.34% · Oct 17, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.35% · Oct 24, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.21% · Oct 31, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.24% · Nov 7, 1997May 12, 1997Aug 12, 1997Nov 12, 1997
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,089.43/month

7.46% · Aug 8, 1997

At the later reference$2,103.81/month

7.53% · Sep 5, 1997

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $14.38 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →