Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

1996 Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change--as measured by output per hour of all persons--and revised annual changes for…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages, 1996

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change--as measured by output per hour of all persons--and revised annual changes for the full year 1996. In the fourth quarter, productivity rose in both the business and nonfarm business sectors. Percent changes in business and nonfarm business productivity were:

For the year 1996, productivity increases in both sectors were the largest since 1992. Fourth-quarter productivity and related measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5; the preliminary and revised fourth-quarter and annual measures appear in table C.

In the manufacturing sector, increases in productivity were:

Manufacturing productivity rose at a 4.4 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter as output increased 4.5 percent but hours of all persons grew only 0.1 percent (table A). On an annual basis, manufacturing productivity rose 3.9 percent in 1996, the largest increase in a decade. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 18 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

THIRD-TO-FOURTH QUARTER CHANGES, 1996 Business

Business sector productivity rose at a 1.2 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1996 as output increased 4.8 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 3.6 percent. The fourth-quarter increase in labor productivity was larger than the 0.3 percent gain posted during the third quarter of 1996, when output rose 2.2 percent and hours of all persons grew 1.9 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 3.7 percent during the fourth quarter of 1996, about the same as the 3.8 percent growth during the third quarter. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee-benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 2.5 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter, a slower rate of growth than the 3.4 percent increase posted one quarter earlier.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), rose at a 0.4 percent annual rate for persons in the business sector. This measure had risen 1.1 percent during the third quarter.

The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, rose 1.1 percent in the fourth quarter. This increase was down slightly from the 1.3 percent gain in the third quarter of 1996.

Nonfarm business

In the nonfarm business sector, productivity rose 1.1 percent at an annual rate in the fourth quarter as output rose 5.0 percent, and hours of all persons--employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers--rose 3.9 percent. During the third quarter, nonfarm productivity had remained unchanged as output and hours both grew 1.9 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation rose 3.6 percent in the fourth quarter, slightly more than the 3.3 percent increase in the third quarter. Real hourly compensation in the fourth quarter increased 0.2 percent when the increase in the CPI-U was taken into account. During the third quarter, real hourly compensation rose 0.7 percent.

Unit labor costs rose 2.5 percent in the fourth quarter, down from a 3.3 percent increase in the third quarter of 1996. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business rose 1.2 percent in both the third and fourth quarters.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity rose at a 4.4 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1996, following an increase of 5.9 percent in the third quarter. Output in the fourth quarter rose 4.5 percent, and hours of all persons increased 0.1 percent. In the third quarter, output grew 5.0 percent but hours dropped 0.9 percent (table 3). Both durable and nondurable goods industries experienced productivity increases in the fourth quarter, 3.4 and 5.7 percent, respectively. In durable goods manufacturing, output increased 3.3 percent in the fourth quarter while hours fell 0.1 percent. Output and hours growth in nondurable goods manufacturing were stronger, 6.2 and 0.4 percent, respectively (tables 4 and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 2.8 percent during the fourth quarter, down from the 4.6 percent increase in the previous quarter. When the increase in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation fell 0.6 percent in the fourth quarter after rising 1.9 percent in the third quarter. Unit labor costs dropped 1.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 1996 and 1.2 percent in the third quarter. These costs have declined in four of the last six quarters.

ANNUAL AVERAGE CHANGES, 1995-1996

Business

In calendar year 1996, business productivity increased 1.0 percent, the largest gain since the 3.4 percent increase posted in 1992 (table 1). Output grew 3.0 percent in 1996, and hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 2.0 percent. In the previous year, productivity had risen only 0.1 percent as output grew 2.5 percent and hours of all persons increased 2.4 percent.

Hourly compensation increased 3.8 percent in 1996, more than the 3.1 percent increase in 1995. The 1996 increase was the largest since 1992, when hourly compensation rose 5.2 percent. Real hourly compensation increased 0.8 percent in 1996 and 0.3 percent in 1995.

Unit labor costs increased 2.8 percent during 1996, just slightly less than the 3.0 percent increase posted a year earlier. The implicit price deflator, reflecting both the increase in unit labor costs and the 0.3 percent decline in unit nonlabor payments in 1996, rose 1.6 percent. The implicit deflator had risen 2.3 percent in 1995.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 0.7 percent in the nonfarm business sector during 1996, as output rose 2.9 percent and hours of all persons increased 2.2 per cent. The 1996 increase in productivity was higher than the 0.3 percent increase posted in 1995, when output rose 2.7 percent and hours of all persons grew 2.4 percent.

Hourly compensation grew more in 1996, 3.6 percent, than it had in 1995, 3.2 percent. Real hourly compensation increased 0.7 percent, compared with 0.3 percent in 1995. The 1996 increase in real hourly compensation was the largest since a 2.1 percent rise in 1992.

Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector grew 2.9 percent in both 1995 and 1996. The implicit price deflator, which reflects nonlabor payments as well as labor costs, rose 1.5 percent in 1996 and 2.2 percent in 1995.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity grew 3.9 percent in 1996, continuing a trend of annual increases that began in 1980. Output in the manufacturing sector increased 2.8 percent in 1996, and hours of all persons declined 1.0 percent. During 1995, productivity rose 3.4 percent, output 3.5 percent, and hours 0.1 percent. Although productivity increased in both the durable and nondurable goods sectors in 1996, durable goods manufacturers had a larger increase (4.9 percent) than nondurable goods manufacturers (3.0 percent). Trends in output and hours also were different in the two subsectors. Output and hours rose 5.1 and 0.2 percent, respectively, in the durable goods sector in 1996. In the nondurable goods sector, output rose 0.1 percent while hours dropped 2.8 percent (tables B, 3, 4, and 5).

The hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 3.5 percent in 1996; however, the rise was only 0.5 percent after the increase in consumer prices was taken into account. In 1995, hourly compensation had increased 3.7 percent, and real hourly compensation rose 0.9 percent. Compensation growth differed between durable and nondurable goods producers in 1996. Hourly compensation in durable goods rose 2.8 percent in 1996, and real hourly compensation dropped 0.1 percent. In nondurable goods industries, hourly compensation rose 4.3 percent, and real hourly compensation rose 1.3 percent.

Unit labor costs in the manufacturing sector fell 0.3 percent in 1996 after rising 0.3 percent in 1995. In durable goods, unit labor costs fell 1.9 percent in 1996 and have fallen every year since 1991, when they rose 2.9 percent. Unit labor costs in nondurable goods rose 1.3 percent in 1996, about the same as the 1.1 percent rise in 1995.

Revised Measures

Productivity and cost measures for the fourth quarter and full year 1996 for business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing were revised to incorporate the most recent information. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity and output measures for the fourth quarter are lower than those reported on February 11 based on information available at that time. In manufacturing, productivity and output measures are higher than those announced on February 11. In all sectors, quarterly measures of real hourly compensation were revised back to the first quarter of 1992 to incorporate the annual recalculation of seasonal factors for the Consumer Price Index (table C).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 11, 1997.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 9, 1997Publication referenceMar 11, 199730 days laterApr 10, 1997
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.74%Observed 7.84%Observed +10 bps vs. earlier reference8.18%Observed +34 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 11, 1996 – Jun 11, 1997
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 11, 1997Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.00%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.57% · Dec 13, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.74% · Dec 20, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.64% · Dec 27, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.67% · Jan 3, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jan 10, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.87% · Jan 17, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jan 24, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Jan 31, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.74% · Feb 7, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Feb 14, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.56% · Feb 21, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Feb 28, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Mar 7, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Mar 14, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · Mar 21, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.97% · Mar 28, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.18% · Apr 4, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.15% · Apr 11, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Apr 18, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.08% · Apr 25, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.01% · May 2, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · May 9, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.91% · May 16, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.92% · May 23, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · May 30, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jun 6, 1997Dec 11, 1996Mar 11, 1997Jun 11, 1997
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,167.92/month

7.84% · Mar 7, 1997

At the later reference$2,239.05/month

8.18% · Apr 4, 1997

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $71.13 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →