Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

February 2013 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 0.7 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods moved up 0.2 percent in January and declined 0.3 percent…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 0.7 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods moved up 0.2 percent in January and declined 0.3 percent in December. At the earlier stages of processing, the index for intermediate goods advanced 1.3 percent in February, and crude goods prices decreased 0.3 percent. On an unadjusted basis, the finished goods index moved up 1.7 percent for the 12 months ended February 2013, the largest 12-month increase since a 2.3-percent rise in October 2012. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In February, the advance in finished goods prices was led by the index for finished energy goods, which rose 3.0 percent. Also contributing to the increase in finished goods prices, the index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent. By contrast, prices for finished consumer foods fell 0.5 percent.

Finished energy: The index for finished energy goods climbed 3.0 percent in February after four straight decreases. Gasoline prices accounted for most of this advance, jumping 7.2 percent. The indexes for home heating oil and diesel fuel also were factors in the increase in finished energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy rose 0.2 percent, the fourth consecutive advance. About twenty percent of the February increase can be traced to prices for pharmaceutical preparations, which moved up 0.2 percent. An advance in the index for plastic products also contributed to higher prices for finished goods less foods and energy.

Finished foods: Prices for finished consumer foods declined 0.5 percent in February subsequent to moving up 0.7 percent in the previous month. The index for fresh and dry vegetables accounted for most of the decrease, falling 18.0 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components moved up 1.3 percent in February, the largest increase since a 1.4-percent jump in April 2011. Nearly two-thirds of the February increase can be attributed to higher prices for intermediate energy goods, which climbed 3.6 percent. The index for intermediate materials less foods and energy rose 0.7 percent, while prices for intermediate foods and feeds were unchanged. For the 12 months ended in February, the index for intermediate goods moved up 1.2 percent, the largest increase since a 2.9- percent advance in March 2012. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods advanced 3.6 percent in February, the largest increase since a 5.6-percent rise in January 2010. A major factor in the February advance was a 6.1-percent jump in the diesel fuel index. Higher prices for gasoline and jet fuel also contributed to the increase in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy rose 0.7 percent in February, the largest advance since a 0.7-percent climb in March 2012. About eighty percent of the February increase can be attributed to a 5.4-percent jump in prices for basic organic chemicals. A rise in the index for plastic resins and materials also contributed to higher intermediate core prices.

Intermediate foods: Prices for intermediate foods and feeds were unchanged in February following three consecutive declines. In February, an advance in the index for prepared animal feeds offset decreases in prices for natural, processed, and imitation cheese and for flour and flour-base mixes and doughs.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing moved down 0.3 percent in February. For the 3 months ended in February, prices for crude goods advanced 1.9 percent compared with a 2.0-percent increase for the 3 months ended in November. The monthly decrease in February was led by the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs, which fell 2.1 percent. Prices for crude nonfood materials less energy declined 1.7 percent. By contrast, the index for crude energy materials rose 2.2 percent. (See table B.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs fell 2.1 percent in February. From November to February, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved down 2.1 percent subsequent to a 3.4-percent advance from August to November. In February, nearly half of the monthly decrease can be traced to a 5.7-percent drop in corn prices. Lower prices for fresh vegetables (except potatoes) and slaughter poultry also were major factors in the decline in the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs. (See table 2.)

Crude core: Prices for crude nonfood materials less energy decreased 1.7 percent in February. For the 3 months ended in February, the index for crude nonfood materials less energy moved down 0.6 percent compared with a 0.7-percent advance for the 3 months ended in November. Nearly half of the monthly decline in February is attributable to prices for carbon steel scrap, which fell 3.7 percent. Lower prices for iron ore also were a contributor to the decrease in the crude core index.

Crude energy: Prices for crude energy materials rose 2.2 percent in February. From November to February, the index for crude energy materials climbed 7.2 percent subsequent to a 1.7-percent advance from August to November. In February, the over-the-month rise can be traced to a 6.3- percent jump in the index for crude petroleum.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries moved down 0.8 percent in February, the third straight decline. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading the February decrease, margins received by wholesale trade industries fell 1.8 percent. Lower margins received by discount department stores and by electronic shopping and mail-order houses also contributed to the decline in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries was unchanged in February following a 1.0-percent rise in January. In February, higher prices received by the U.S. Postal Service and the truck transportation industry group offset lower prices received by the air transportation industry group and inland water freight transporters.

Services less trade, transportation, and warehousing: The Producer Price Index for the net output of services less trade, transportation, and warehousing rose 0.3 percent in February subsequent to a 0.5-percent advance a month earlier. Accounting for over thirty percent of the February increase, prices received by general medical and surgical hospitals moved up 0.7 percent. Higher prices received by the industries for commercial banking and passenger car rental also contributed to the increase in the index for services less trade, transportation, and warehousing.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 14, 2013.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 12, 2013Publication referenceMar 14, 201330 days laterApr 13, 2013
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.53%Observed 3.63%Observed +10 bps vs. earlier reference3.43%Observed −20 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 14, 2012 – Jun 14, 2013
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 14, 2013Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%3.50%4.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.37% · Dec 20, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.35% · Dec 27, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.34% · Jan 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Jan 10, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.38% · Jan 17, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.42% · Jan 24, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Jan 31, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Feb 7, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.53% · Feb 14, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.56% · Feb 21, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.51% · Feb 28, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.52% · Mar 7, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.63% · Mar 14, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.54% · Mar 21, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.57% · Mar 28, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.54% · Apr 4, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.43% · Apr 11, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.41% · Apr 18, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Apr 25, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.35% · May 2, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.42% · May 9, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.51% · May 16, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · May 23, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.81% · May 30, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jun 6, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jun 13, 2013Dec 14, 2012Mar 14, 2013Jun 14, 2013
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,369.00/month

3.63% · Mar 14, 2013

At the later reference$1,335.44/month

3.43% · Apr 11, 2013

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $33.56 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →