Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

February 2012 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods advanced 0.4 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Finished goods prices rose 0.1 percent in January and decreased 0.1 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods advanced 0.4 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Finished goods prices rose 0.1 percent in January and decreased 0.1 percent in December. At the earlier stages of processing, the index for intermediate goods moved up 0.7 percent and crude goods prices increased 0.4 percent. On an unadjusted basis, the finished goods index rose 3.3 percent for the 12 months ended February 2012, the smallest year-over-year rise since a similar 3.3-percent advance in August 2010. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In February, the increase in finished goods prices was led by the index for finished energy goods, which moved up 1.3 percent. Prices for finished goods less foods and energy rose 0.2 percent. By contrast, the finished consumer foods index edged down 0.1 percent.

Finished energy: Prices for finished energy goods advanced 1.3 percent in February after declining in each of the previous two months. A 4.3-percent jump in the gasoline index accounted for most of the increase. Advances in the indexes for residential electric power and home heating oil also contributed to the rise in finished energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent in February, the third straight monthly increase. A third of the February rise can be traced to a 0.6- percent advance in prices for pharmaceutical preparations. An increase in the index for civilian aircraft also contributed to higher finished core prices.

Finished foods: In February, the finished consumer foods index inched down 0.1 percent, the third consecutive monthly decrease. A 2.8-percent drop in prices for dairy products led the February decline in the finished consumer foods index.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components moved up 0.7 percent in February following a 0.4-percent decline in January. Most of this advance can be attributed to higher prices for intermediate materials less foods and energy, which climbed 1.0 percent. The index for intermediate energy goods rose 0.3 percent. By contrast, prices for intermediate foods and feeds edged down 0.1 percent. For the 12 months ended in February, the intermediate goods index advanced 3.3 percent, the smallest year-over-year increase since a 2.9- percent rise in December 2009. (See table B.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate goods less foods and energy moved up 1.0 percent in February after four consecutive declines. Sixty percent of this increase can be traced to the index for basic organic chemicals, which jumped 6.4 percent. Higher prices for nonferrous mill shapes and prepared paint also contributed to the advance in the intermediate core index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods advanced 0.3 percent in February after declining 1.4 percent a month earlier. A major factor in this rise was the index for diesel fuel, which increased 4.1 percent. Higher gasoline prices also contributed significantly to the advance in the intermediate energy goods index.

Intermediate foods: Prices for intermediate foods and feeds edged down 0.1 percent in February, the third straight monthly decrease. A 1.6-percent drop in prices for meats was a significant contributor to the February decline. Lower prices for dairy products also were a major factor in the decrease in the intermediate foods index.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing advanced 0.4 percent in February. For the 3 months ending in February, crude goods prices moved up 0.4 percent compared with a 2.3-percent increase for the 3 months ending in November. On a monthly basis, the February index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs climbed 0.6 percent, and prices for crude energy materials moved up 0.3 percent. By contrast, the index for crude nonfood materials less energy declined 0.3 percent. (See table B.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs increased 0.6 percent in February. From November to February, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs fell 0.4 percent, compared with a 1.6-percent decrease from August to November. Leading the monthly rise in February was the slaughter cattle index, which climbed 5.4 percent. Higher prices for slaughter poultry and soybeans also were factors in the advance in the crude foods index. (See table 2.)

Crude energy: The Producer Price Index for crude energy materials moved up 0.3 percent in February. For the 3 months ending in February, prices for crude energy materials increased 0.9 percent following an 11.2-percent jump in the previous 3-month period. The February advance in the crude energy materials index is attributable to prices for crude petroleum, which rose 5.4 percent.

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy fell 0.3 percent in February. From November to February, crude core prices inched up 0.2 percent after decreasing 5.7 percent from August to November. In February, most of the monthly decline can be traced to a 6.4- percent drop in the index for carbon steel scrap. Lower corn prices also contributed to the decrease in the crude core index.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries edged down 0.1 percent in February after no change in the prior month. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading the February decline was an 11.7-percent decrease in margins received by discount department stores. Lower margins received by merchant wholesalers of durable goods and by electronic shopping and mail-order houses also contributed significantly to the decrease in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries moved up 0.4 percent in February, the third consecutive increase. Almost half of the February gain can be attributed to a 2.3-percent advance in prices received by the U.S. Postal Service. Higher prices received for long-distance general freight trucking and by line-haul railroads also were factors in the February increase in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries rose 0.2 percent in February subsequent to a 0.4-percent advance a month earlier. Accounting for thirty percent of the February increase, prices received by portfolio managers climbed 2.2 percent. Higher prices received by investment bankers and securities dealers and by non-casino hotels and motels also contributed to the February increase in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 15, 2012.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 14, 2012Publication referenceMar 15, 201230 days laterApr 14, 2012
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.87%Observed 3.92%Observed +5 bps vs. earlier reference3.88%Observed −4 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 15, 2011 – Jun 15, 2012
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 15, 2012Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.00%4.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Dec 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Dec 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Dec 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jan 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.89% · Jan 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Jan 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jan 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 2, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 9, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.87% · Feb 16, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.95% · Feb 23, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Mar 1, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Mar 8, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.92% · Mar 15, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 4.08% · Mar 22, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Mar 29, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Apr 5, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 12, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.90% · Apr 19, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.88% · Apr 26, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.84% · May 3, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.83% · May 10, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.79% · May 17, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.78% · May 24, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.75% · May 31, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.67% · Jun 7, 201230-year fixed mortgage: 3.71% · Jun 14, 2012Dec 15, 2011Mar 15, 2012Jun 15, 2012
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,418.44/month

3.92% · Mar 15, 2012

At the later reference$1,411.57/month

3.88% · Apr 12, 2012

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $6.87 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →