Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

February 2003 U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes

The U.S. Import Price Index increased 1.3 percent in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The rise in the index, which had advanced 1.6 percent in January, was again led by higher…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

-FEBRUARY 2003-

The U.S. Import Price Index increased 1.3 percent in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The rise in the index, which had advanced 1.6 percent in January, was again led by higher petroleum prices. The Export Price Index also was up in February, rising 0.4 percent for the second consecutive month.

Import Goods

Import prices rose for the third consecutive month and were up 3.6 percent over the three-month period. For the year ended in February, the price index for overall imports rose 7.0 percent. The increase in import prices continues to be primarily attributable to rising petroleum prices, which were up 8.2 percent in February, after increasing 13.3 percent in January, and are at the highest level since the index was first published in June 1982. Over the past 12 months, imported petroleum prices were up 75.0 percent. In addition, the index for nonpetroleum imports rose 0.4 percent in February, the largest monthly increase in this component since April 2002. The index was up 1.6 percent in the past 12 months.

The increase in nonpetroleum prices was led by a 2.3 percent increase in the index for nonpetroleum industrial supplies and materials. Rising prices for natural gas, petroleum-based products, and precious metals all contributed to the increase. For the year ended in February, nonpetroleum industrial supplies and materials prices were up 10.9 percent.

Modest increases in prices for each of the major finished goods indexes also contributed to the rise in nonpetroleum import prices. The rises paralleled the recent decline in the value of the U.S. dollar. The import price indexes of capital goods, consumer goods, and automotive vehicles each rose 0.1 percent in February. Over the past 12 months, prices for capital goods and consumer goods both declined, down 1.6 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively; prices for automotive vehicles were up 0.3 percent.

In contrast, the price index for imported foods, feeds, and beverages fell 0.7 percent last month, led by decreasing vegetable prices. For the year ended in February, however, the index was up 6.9 percent.

Export Goods

In February, export prices rose 0.4 percent for the second consecutive month, as increasing nonagricultural prices outweighed a downturn in agricultural prices. Over the past 12 months, the price index for overall exports was up 2.2 percent. The index for agricultural exports declined 0.6 percent last month, led by falling prices for vegetables and soybeans. Despite the decline, agricultural prices were up 9.8 percent for the year ended in February. Nonagricultural prices rose 0.5 percent in February, the largest increase in this index since April 1995. Over the past year, prices for nonagricultural exports were up 1.5 percent.

The February rise in nonagricultural export prices was led by increasing prices for industrial supplies and materials, up 1.7 percent last month-the largest jump in this index since a similar 1.7 percent advance in February 2000. Increasing prices for petroleum, petroleum-based products, and gold all contributed to the rise in prices for exported industrial supplies and materials. Over the last 12 months, the index was up 8.2 percent.

Prices for exported capital goods rose 0.2 percent for the second consecutive month, after declining or posting no change over the prior eight months. For the year ended in February, the index was down 0.7 percent. The price index for consumer goods also contributed to the overall increase in export prices last month, rising 0.3 percent. The advance was the largest monthly increase since September 1997.

The index for exported automotive vehicles was unchanged last month and was up 0.6 percent for the year ended in February.

Imports by Locality of Origin

The price index for imports from Japan was up 0.3 percent in February, the largest increase posted for this index since a similar change in July 2000. For the year ended in February, the index was down 1.1 percent.

Import prices from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries were down 0.2 percent in February, the third consecutive decline in this index. For the February 2002-2003 period, the index was down 2.6 percent.

Prices of imports from the European Union, Latin America, and Canada all rose last month, led by higher fuel prices. Import prices from Europe were up 2.2 percent in February, the largest increase in this index since monthly publication began in October 1992. Over the past year, prices from the European Union were up 6.6 percent. The indexes of prices from Latin America and Canada increased 2.7 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively, in February. For the year ended in February, import prices from Latin America were up 15.3 percent and prices from Canada increased 9.2 percent.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 13, 2003.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes

Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 11, 2003Publication referenceMar 13, 200330 days laterApr 12, 2003
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.88%Observed 5.67%Observed −21 bps vs. earlier reference5.85%Observed +18 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 13, 2002 – Jun 13, 2003
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 13, 2003Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.00%5.75%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.04% · Dec 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Dec 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.93% · Dec 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Jan 3, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.95% · Jan 10, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.97% · Jan 17, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Jan 24, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.90% · Jan 31, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.88% · Feb 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.86% · Feb 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.84% · Feb 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Feb 28, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Mar 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.61% · Mar 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Mar 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.91% · Mar 28, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Apr 4, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Apr 11, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Apr 18, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.79% · Apr 25, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.70% · May 2, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.62% · May 9, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.45% · May 16, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.34% · May 23, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.31% · May 30, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.26% · Jun 6, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 13, 2003Dec 13, 2002Mar 13, 2003Jun 13, 2003
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,735.50/month

5.67% · Mar 7, 2003

At the later reference$1,769.82/month

5.85% · Apr 11, 2003

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $34.32 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →