February 1996 U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes
The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.5 percent in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decline followed three consecutive monthly increases and was attributable to a downturn in…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics3 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
-FEBRUARY 1996-
The U.S. Import Price Index fell 0.5 percent in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decline followed three consecutive monthly increases and was attributable to a downturn in petroleum prices. The U.S. Export Price Index decreased 0.2 percent in February, following a 0.4 percent advance in January.
Import Goods
The February turnaround in import prices paralleled a reversal in petroleum prices. For the year ended in February, import prices increased 1.3 percent compared with a 5.8 percent rise in the previous 12-month period.
The petroleum import price index fell 5.6 percent in February after increasing 9.8 percent over the previous 2 months. Despite relatively volatile monthly fluctuations in the past 12 months, the index was only 1.2 percent above a year ago. The index for imports excluding petroleum was unchanged in February after decreasing 0.3 percent in January. In the 12-month period ended in February, this index increased 1.4 percent.
The index for industrial supplies, excluding petroleum, fell 0.9 percent in February, after declining 0.3 percent in January. The decrease was the largest recorded for this index since June 1993. In contrast, there was a 2.6 percent increase in February in the index for foods, feeds, and beverages, largely attributable to vegetable and coffee price increases.
Other indexes showed little change. The indexes for automotive vehicles and consumer goods both moved up 0.1 percent in February after recording a 0.3 percent decline and no change in January, respectively. Import prices for capital goods decreased slightly in February, edging down 0.1 percent, after posting no change in the previous month.
Export Goods
The February decrease in export prices was broad based, as both major components of the index decreased. For the 12 months ended in February, export prices rose 2.1 percent, less than half the increase recorded for the February 1994-95 period.
Agricultural export prices, which increased in each of the previous 5 months, fell 0.3 percent in February. For the 12-month period, the index was 18.5 percent higher than a year earlier. Nonagricultural export prices fell 0.2 percent in February, the seventh decline in the past 8 months. Over the past 12 months, however, the index edged up 0.1 percent.
Nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials led the decline in nonagricultural export prices, falling 1.4 percent in February after posting a 0.2 percent increase in January. During the last half of 1995, the index had declined 5.3 percent.
All of the finished goods indexes were either unchanged or posted slight gains. The export price indexes for both capital and consumer goods rose 0.2 percent after increasing the previous month. For the second consecutive month, the index for automotive vehicles, parts, and engines was unchanged.
Imports by Locality of Origin
Import prices from Japan continued a recent downward trend, falling 0.3 percent in February following monthly declines of 0.2 and 0.4 percent in January and December, respectively. Despite the declines, the index gained 2.2 percent over the past year.
The index for import prices from Canada also fell in February, decreasing 0.9 percent. The decrease was the largest for the index since November 1992 and followed a 0.4 decline in January. For the year, however, the index rose 2.2 percent.
After increasing in each of the preceding 3 months, the price index of imports from the European Union was unchanged in February. During the past 12 months, the average price of imported goods from the European Union rose 4.3 percent.
The index for imports from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries edged up 0.1 percent after declining over the previous 4- month period. For the year ended in February, prices of products from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries recorded comparatively little movement, up 0.1 percent.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes
Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Six months around publication
Dec 26, 1995 – Jun 26, 1996
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$2,161.69/month
7.81% · Mar 22, 1996
At the later reference$2,190.85/month
7.95% · Apr 19, 1996
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $29.16 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.