Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 2001 Employment Situation

Nonfarm payroll employment fell by 114,000 in June, and the unemployment rate was little changed, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Manufacturing experienced another large job loss, and…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Nonfarm payroll employment fell by 114,000 in June, and the unemployment rate was little changed, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Manufacturing experienced another large job loss, and wholesale trade employment declined for the third consecutive month. Other major industry groups showed no significant change in employment over the month.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

Both the unemployment rate (4.5 percent) and the number of unemployed per- sons (6.4 million) were little changed in June. In each of the past 3 months, the jobless rate has been either 4.4 or 4.5 percent; its most recent low was 3.9 percent in October 2000. The rates for all the major worker groups--adult men (4.0 percent), adult women (3.8 percent), teenagers (14.3 percent), whites (4.0 percent), blacks (8.4 percent), and Hispanics (6.6 percent)--showed little or no change over the month. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment, at 134.9 million, was little changed in June. Since Jan- uary, it has declined by about 1.1 million. Over the month, the employment- population ratio decreased to 63.7 percent and has fallen by 0.8 percentage point since January.

The civilian labor force (141.4 million) was essentially unchanged over the month, after seasonal adjustment, and the labor force participation rate--the proportion of the population 16 years of age and older who are either working or looking for work--remained at 66.8 percent. Since January, the participation rate has declined by half a percentage point. (See table A-1.)

The number of persons working part time for economic reasons increased by 266,000 to 3.6 million. This was about half a million more than a year earlier. These persons indicated that they would like to work full time but worked part time because their hours had been cut back or they were unable to find a full-time job. (See table A-4.)

In June, 7.3 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job. These multiple jobholders represented 5.4 percent of the employed, the same as a year earlier. (See table A-10.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

In June, 4.6 million people not in the labor force (seasonally adjusted) reported that they currently wanted a job. These individuals are not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. Indeed, most had not searched for work in the prior year. (See table A-1.) Among persons who wanted a job, about 1.2 million (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in June. These were people who were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. In June, the number of discouraged workers was 291,000. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them. (See table A-10.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment fell by 114,000 in June to 132.4 million, seasonally adjusted. This was the second decline in the past 3 months (as revised) and brought total job losses in the second quarter to 271,000. Manufacturing employment continued to fall sharply in June, and related industries such as wholesale trade and transportation also lost jobs. The other major industry groups had little or no change in employment over the month. (See table B-1.)

Manufacturing lost 113,000 jobs in June. Since last July, the industry has lost 785,000 jobs, with nearly three-quarters of the decline coming since the end of 2000. In June, employment losses in manufacturing again were widespread, with the largest declines occurring in electronic equip- ment (31,000), industrial machinery (22,000), and fabricated metals and textiles (8,000 each). Job losses in electronic equipment and industrial machinery have accelerated over the past 3 months, as they also have in textiles, furniture, and printing and publishing.

Construction employment was little changed in June and was down over the second quarter (seasonally adjusted). Strong job growth in the first quarter may have lessened the need for the industry to add workers during the spring buildup. Monthly job growth in the industry has averaged 15,000 thus far in 2001, slightly below the average monthly growth for all of 2000.

In mining, employment continued to rise in oil and gas extraction, although June's gain was the smallest this year.

In the service-producing sector, employment in wholesale trade decreased sharply for the third consecutive month. Employment declines in this industry have totaled 42,000 since March, reflecting cutbacks in both domestic indus- trial production and imports.

Employment in transportation and public utilities declined by 11,000 in June. All of the loss occurred in transportation. Manufacturing's severe downturn continued to affect the movement of goods both by truck and air. Employment in air transportation also has been affected by reductions in business travel.

Employment in services was flat in June, following a gain of 65,000 (as revised) in May. Strong job gains in health services, engineering and management services, motion pictures, and computer services were offset by large losses in help supply services, hotels, amusements and recreation, and educational services. Since reaching its peak last September, the help supply industry has lost 379,000 jobs.

Employment in finance, insurance, and real estate was little changed in June. Employment gains continued in commercial banks and in mortgage banks; these were offset by declines in insurance and real estate and continued losses in security brokerages, which have shed 12,000 jobs since March.

In June, employment in retail trade also was little changed. Job gains in eating and drinking places and building materials and garden supplies were partially offset by continued losses in food stores. Job gains in retail trade have averaged 24,000 a month in 2001, about the same as the monthly average for all of last year.

In government, small job gains in state and local government more than offset losses in the federal government. Average monthly job gains in local government thus far in 2001 have been considerably larger than in 2000.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged in June at 34.3 hours, seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing workweek edged down by 0.1 hour to 40.7 hours. Manufac- turing overtime was up by 0.1 hour to 4.0 hours. Over the past 12 months, the factory workweek has fallen by 1.0 hour and factory overtime by 0.6 hour. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls declined by 0.2 percent in June to 151.2 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index fell by 1.0 percent to 98.2. The manufacturing index has fallen by 7.9 percent over the past 12 months and is now at its lowest level since March 1983. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls increased by 4 cents in June to $14.29, seasonally adjusted. Over the month, average weekly earnings increased by 0.3 percent to $490.15. Over the year, average hourly earnings rose by 4.2 percent and average weekly earnings grew by 3.6 percent. (See table B-3.)

Expansion of the Current Population Survey (Household Survey) Sample

Beginning in September 2000, the Census Bureau expanded the monthly sample for the Current Population Survey (CPS) to meet the requirements of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) legislation. This legislation requires that the Census Bureau improve state estimates of the number of children who live in low-income families and lack health insurance. These estimates are obtained from the Annual Demographic Supplement to the CPS. The expansion of the monthly CPS sample was one part of the Census Bureau's plan for strengthening the SCHIP estimates. The monthly CPS sample was increased in 31 states and the District of Columbia, and the total number of households eligible for the survey rose from about 50,000 to about 60,000. The additional households were introduced into the survey over a 3-month period beginning in September 2000.

In the September 2000 Employment Situation news release (USDL 00-284), the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) stated that it would not use the additional sample to produce the official national labor force estimates prior to the release of July 2001 data in August. This delay would allow BLS sufficient time to evaluate the differences, if any, between the estimates obtained from the current 50,000-household sample and the expanded 60,000-household sample. BLS evaluated the monthly data for the November 2000-April 2001 period and found no significant differences in the national labor force estimates derived from the two samples. Thus, BLS plans to incorporate the additional sample into the July 2001 official national estimates. Since estimates from the two samples were virtually identical, household data for the first 6 months of 2001 will not be revised.

The August 2001 issue of Employment and Earnings will contain an article discussing this sample expansion in more detail.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 6, 2001.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 6, 2001Publication referenceJul 6, 200130 days laterAug 5, 2001
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.24%Observed 7.19%Observed −5 bps vs. earlier reference7.00%Observed −19 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 6, 2001 – Oct 6, 2001
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 6, 2001Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Apr 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.04% · Apr 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Apr 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Apr 27, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 4, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.10% · May 11, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 18, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.20% · May 25, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.24% · Jun 1, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.20% · Jun 8, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Jun 15, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Jun 22, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Jun 29, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · Jul 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.21% · Jul 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Jul 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Jul 27, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.00% · Aug 3, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.00% · Aug 10, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 17, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Aug 24, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 31, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Sep 7, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.86% · Sep 14, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.80% · Sep 21, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.72% · Sep 28, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.64% · Oct 5, 2001Apr 6, 2001Jul 6, 2001Oct 6, 2001
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,034.33/month

7.19% · Jul 6, 2001

At the later reference$1,995.91/month

7.00% · Aug 3, 2001

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $38.43 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →