Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

April 2001 Employment Situation

Employment declined in April, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Payroll employment fell by 223,000, following a decline of 53,000 (as revised)…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment declined in April, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Payroll employment fell by 223,000, following a decline of 53,000 (as revised) in March. In April, large job losses continued in manufacturing and in help supply services, and construction employment declined after seasonal adjustment. Average hourly earnings rose by 5 cents over the month.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed persons rose by more than 300,000 in April to 6.4 million and has increased by about 870,000 since October. The unemployment rate increased from 4.3 to 4.5 percent over the month and has risen by 0.6 percentage point since October. In April, the jobless rates were up for adult women (3.8 percent) and whites (4.0 percent). The rates for other major worker groups--adult men (4.0 percent), teenagers (14.2 percent), blacks (8.2 percent), and Hispanics (6.5 percent)--were little changed over the month, but all are up since October. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

The unemployment rate for college graduates age 25 and over rose for the second consecutive month in April, but at 2.3 percent was still well below the rates for groups with less education. (See table A-3.)

The number of unemployed persons who lost their jobs or completed temporary jobs continued to increase in April, and at 3.2 million was up by about three-quarters of a million from its October level. The number of persons unemployed for less than 5 weeks also rose over the month, to nearly 3.0 million. Since October, the number of these newly unemployed has increased by about 450,000. (See tables A-6 and A-7.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Both total employment, at 135.4 million, and the employment-population ratio, at 64.0 percent, declined in April. The civilian labor force was essentially unchanged at 141.8 million, as was the labor force participation rate at 67.1 percent. (See table A-1.)

In April, there were 7.3 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) holding more than one job. Multiple jobholders represented 5.4 percent of the employed, down from 5.7 percent a year ago. (See table A-10.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.1 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in April. These were people who wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior

12 months but were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. In April, the number of discouraged workers was 346,000. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them. (See table A-10.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment declined for the second straight month, falling by 223,000 in April. Manufacturing and help supply services both posted sharp job losses, and construction employment fell after seasonal adjustment. There was little or no job growth in most other industries over the month. (See table B-1.)

In the goods-producing sector, manufacturing employment fell by 104,000 in April. Declines since last June have totaled 554,000, and two-thirds of those job losses have occurred in the past 4 months. Manufacturing employment declines continued to be widespread in April. Large losses continued in electrical equipment (31,000), with electronic components accounting for two-thirds of the decline. Large declines also occurred in industrial machinery (16,000) and fabricated metals (13,000). In nondurable goods manufacturing, job losses continued in apparel, textiles, printing and publishing, and rubber and miscellaneous plastics.

In April, seasonal hiring was weaker than normal in construction, and, as a result, employment decreased by 64,000 on a seasonally adjusted basis. This decline may reflect, in part, the heavy rains over much of the country's interior. Since last October, construction has added an average of 16,000 jobs a month, compared with a monthly average of 23,000 for the period of October 1999 to October 2000.

In mining, employment in oil and gas extraction continued to increase in April and has risen by 17,000 thus far this year.

In the service-producing sector, the services industry lost 121,000 jobs in April, despite job gains in health services (14,000), social services (14,000), and computer services (7,000). Help supply services experienced another sharp job decline (108,000). This industry, which provides just-in-time workers to other businesses, has lost 370,000 jobs since September. Seasonal hiring in amusement and recreation services and hotels was well below normal this month, resulting in employment declines of 30,000 and 13,000, respectively.

In retail trade, eating and drinking places added 41,000 jobs in April, reversing a loss in March. Food stores also added jobs in April. Partly offsetting these increases were job losses in general merchandise, apparel, building materials and garden supplies, and furniture stores. Employment in furniture stores, which had trended up in 2000, has shown no increase this year.

Wholesale trade experienced job losses for the fifth straight month in April; employment in the industry has declined by 27,000 over this period. Finance, insurance, and real estate added 8,000 jobs in April. The gains were primarily in depository institutions and insurance carriers. The number of jobs in mortgage banks was little changed, and employment in security brokerages declined.

Local government employment increased by 32,000 in April; the gain was split evenly between education and noneducation agencies.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged in April at 34.3 hours, seasonally adjusted. Both the manufacturing workweek and manufacturing overtime also were unchanged at 40.7 and 3.8 hours, respectively. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls decreased by 0.3 percent over the month to 151.3 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index fell by 0.8 percent to 100.3 in April. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls increased by 5 cents in April to $14.22, seasonally adjusted. April's increase was equal to the monthly average for the first 3 months of this year. Over the month, average weekly earnings increased by 0.4 percent to $487.75. Over the year, average hourly earnings rose by 4.3 percent and average weekly earnings grew by 3.4 percent. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 4, 2001.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 4, 2001Publication referenceMay 4, 200130 days laterJun 3, 2001
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.91%Observed 7.14%Observed +23 bps vs. earlier reference7.24%Observed +10 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 4, 2001 – Aug 4, 2001
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 4, 2001Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Feb 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Feb 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Feb 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Mar 2, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.97% · Mar 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Mar 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Mar 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Mar 30, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Apr 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.04% · Apr 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Apr 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Apr 27, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 4, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.10% · May 11, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 18, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.20% · May 25, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.24% · Jun 1, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.20% · Jun 8, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Jun 15, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Jun 22, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Jun 29, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · Jul 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.21% · Jul 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Jul 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Jul 27, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.00% · Aug 3, 2001Feb 4, 2001May 4, 2001Aug 4, 2001
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,024.19/month

7.14% · May 4, 2001

At the later reference$2,044.49/month

7.24% · Jun 1, 2001

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $20.30 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →