Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 1998 Employment Situation

Nonfarm payroll employment rose in June, and the unemployment rate edged up to 4.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Payroll employment grew by 205,000, following 2 months of gains…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Nonfarm payroll employment rose in June, and the unemployment rate edged up to 4.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Payroll employment grew by 205,000, following 2 months of gains above 300,000. Job gains occurred in construction and in many service-producing industries, while employment in manufacturing fell.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed persons increased from 5.9 to 6.2 million in June. The unemployment rate was 4.5 percent; it had been 4.3 percent in the prior 2 months. The jobless rate for whites rose by 0.3 percentage point to 4.0 percent. Unemployment rates across most of the other major demographic groups--adult men (3.7 percent), adult women (4.1 percent), teenagers (14.6 percent), blacks (8.2 percent), and Hispanics (7.6 percent)--were not significantly changed from May. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Among the major educational attainment categories, the unemployment rate for high school graduates 25 years and older with no college experience rose by 0.3 percentage point to 4.0 percent. Jobless rates for persons with less than a high school diploma (7.2 percent), some college experience but no bachelor’s degree (2.9 percent), and college graduates (1.7 percent) were essentially unchanged. (See table A-3.)

The number of persons unemployed for 15 weeks or more increased slightly to 1.6 million in June, but has fallen by about 350,000 over the last year (after adjustment is made for changes in the composite estimation procedure). (See table A-6.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment was essentially unchanged at 131.2 million in June. The employment-population ratio--the proportion of the population age 16 and older with jobs--was 64.0 percent, just below the all-time high of 64.2 percent that had prevailed for most of this year. (See table A-1.)

About 7.7 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in June. These multiple jobholders comprised 5.8 percent of total employment. (See table A-10.)

The civilian labor force was about unchanged in June, at 137.4 million (seasonally adjusted). The labor force participation rate held at 67.0 percent for the third consecutive month. (See table A-1.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.2 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in June, down somewhat from a year earlier. These were people who wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months but were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-10.)

The number of discouraged workers--a subset of the marginally attached who were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them--totaled 311,000 in June.

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 205,000 in June, after seasonal adjustment. Employment gains were widespread across the private sector, but were partially offset by job losses in manufacturing and government. (See table B-1.)

The services industry added 136,000 jobs in June. This followed a gain of 153,000 in May and a series of much smaller increases from February through April. Business services accounted for nearly half of June’s increase, with help supply services and computer services adding 32,000 and 21,000 jobs, respectively. Engineering and management services gained 25,000 jobs, health services, 23,000, and social services, 13,000, each continuing its long-term growth trend.

Employment in retail trade grew by 53,000 in June, the industry's third consecutive large monthly increase. Employment growth was led by eating and drinking places (21,000), furniture and home furnishings stores (8,000), miscellaneous retail establishments (7,000), and automotive dealers and service stations (6,000). Wholesale trade employment increased by 15,000, about in line with the average for the prior 12 months.

Finance, insurance, and real estate continued its steady growth pattern, adding 30,000 jobs over the month. The gains were widespread, with the largest occurring in security and commodity brokerages, nondepository institutions, and insurance carriers. Real estate employment also rose, after showing little change in May.

Transportation and public utilities added 14,000 jobs in June, following a similar gain in May. Employment in trucking and warehousing increased by 11,000, and communications added 8,000 jobs.

Construction employment grew by 20,000 in June, following a decline in May. Employment changes in this industry have varied in recent months, reflecting the impact of unusual weather; the industry has added 215,000 jobs since last October.

Manufacturing employment fell by 29,000 in June, following a decline of 22,000 in May. The June losses were widespread; the largest (6,000 each) were in apparel, which continued its long-term decline, and in automobile manufacturing. A strike involving 3,000 workers in an auto stamping plant (in the fabricated metals industry) led to several plant shutdowns in the auto industry. Textiles, paper products, electronic components, and food and kindred products also lost jobs. In contrast to all of these declines, printing and publishing employment rose by 5,000, after 4 months of virtually no change, and employment in stone, clay, and glass products, which has been moving erratically for several months, increased by 3,000.

Government payrolls fell in June by 33,000, mostly in schools, where employment was strong in May. The noneducation component of state government also recorded a drop in employment, primarily because of a strike in public transportation, while local government other than education continued to add jobs. Federal government employment continued to decline.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls edged down by 0.1 hour in June to 34.6 hours, seasonally adjusted. In manufacturing, the workweek and overtime were unchanged at 41.8 and 4.6 hours, respectively. Weekly hours in auto manufacturing fell by 0.9 hour due to the strike-related plant shutdowns that occurred during the survey reference period. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls was little changed at 144.8 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index edged down by 0.3 percent to 109.1. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls edged up 1 cent in June to $12.74, seasonally adjusted. Average weekly earnings decreased by 0.2 percent to $440.80. Over the year, average hourly and weekly earnings have risen by 4.1 and 4.4 percent, respectively. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 2, 1998.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 2, 1998Publication referenceJul 2, 199830 days laterAug 1, 1998
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.07%Observed 6.96%Observed −11 bps vs. earlier reference6.97%Observed +1 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 2, 1998 – Oct 2, 1998
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 2, 1998Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Apr 3, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Apr 10, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Apr 17, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Apr 24, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.22% · May 1, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 8, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · May 15, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.10% · May 22, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.07% · May 29, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.05% · Jun 5, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.04% · Jun 12, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Jun 19, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jun 26, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Jul 3, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Jul 10, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Jul 17, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jul 24, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.97% · Jul 31, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Aug 7, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Aug 14, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 21, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 28, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.82% · Sep 4, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.77% · Sep 11, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.66% · Sep 18, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.64% · Sep 25, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.60% · Oct 2, 1998Apr 2, 1998Jul 2, 1998Oct 2, 1998
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,987.85/month

6.96% · Jun 26, 1998

At the later reference$1,989.87/month

6.97% · Jul 31, 1998

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $2.01 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →