Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

April 1998 Employment Situation

The unemployment rate declined to 4.3 percent in April; from November through March, the rate had been either 4.6 or 4.7 percent. Nonfarm payroll employment grew by 262,000, following a small decline in March. Manufacturing was weak for…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment increased, and unemployment fell sharply in April, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.

The unemployment rate declined to 4.3 percent in April; from November through March, the rate had been either 4.6 or 4.7 percent. Nonfarm payroll employment grew by 262,000, following a small decline in March. Manufacturing was weak for the third straight month.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed persons declined from 6.5 to 5.9 million in April, and the unemployment rate fell from 4.7 to 4.3 percent. This improvement was widespread across the major demographic groups. Unemployment rates in April were 3.4 percent for adult men, 4.1 percent for adult women, 13.1 percent for teenagers, 3.6 percent for whites, 8.9 percent for blacks, and 6.5 percent for Hispanics. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Across the major educational attainment categories, the largest unemployment rate declines for persons 25 years of age and over took place for those with a high school diploma only (to 3.9 percent) and for those with some college experience but no bachelor’s degree (to 2.7 percent). The jobless rates were 7.0 percent for those with less than a high school diploma and 1.7 percent for college graduates. (See table A-3.)

The number of persons unemployed for less than 5 weeks declined by 226,000 to 2.6 million in April, after rising in March. The number unemployed for 15 weeks or longer, 1.4 million, also fell over the month and has declined by 630,000 over the year, after adjustment is made for changes in the composite estimation procedure. The number of unemployed job losers on temporary layoff and the number of job leavers both fell over the month. (See tables A-6 and A-7.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment rose by 389,000 in April to 131.4 million. Over the year, employment has risen by 2.3 million, after adjusting for changes in the composite estimation procedure. The employment-population ratio--the proportion of the population age 16 and older with jobs--returned to its all- time high of 64.2 percent in April. (See table A-1.)

About 7.9 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in April. They comprised 6.1 percent of the total employed. (See table A-10.)

The civilian labor force, 137.2 million (seasonally adjusted), was about unchanged over the month. The labor force participation rate edged down to 67.0 percent. (See table A-1.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.3 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in April, down about 200,000 from a year earlier. These were people who wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months but were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.

The number of discouraged workers--a subset of the marginally attached who were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them--totaled 344,000 in April, essentially unchanged from a year earlier. (See table A-10.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 262,000 in April, after seasonal adjustment, following a small decline in March. Employment in construction, services, and retail trade rebounded in April, after showing weakness in the prior month. Finance, insurance, and real estate continued its strong growth, while manufacturing payrolls edged down. (See table B-1.)

Within the goods-producing sector, construction added 35,000 jobs, seasonally adjusted, following a weather-related decline (-85,000) in March. Since last October, employment in this industry has expanded by 178,000.

Manufacturing employment declined by 10,000 in April. Between September and January, factory employment rose by 169,000; in contrast, since January, 16,000 jobs have been lost. In April, declines occurred in electronic components (-4,000) and industrial machinery (-2,000). Until February, both industries had shown strong and consistent growth for about a year. The apparel industry continued to shrink, losing 6,000 jobs in April, and employment in paper and allied products declined by 3,000 over the month. In contrast, job growth continued in furniture, and employment rose by 3,000 in stone, clay, and glass products, offsetting the prior month’s decline.

In the service-producing sector, the services industry added 139,000 jobs, following a relatively small rise (38,000) in March. Help supply services gained 30,000 jobs in April, after a decline of 21,000 in the previous month. Employment growth remained strong in computer services (20,000) and engineering and management services (19,000). Employment in agricultural services rose by 10,000, after 2 consecutive months of losses. Following weakness in March, health services showed a moderate employment increase of 14,000 in April. Gains in hospitals and doctors’ offices were partly offset by continuing losses in home health care.

Low mortgage rates and a strong stock market contributed to employment gains in finance, insurance, and real estate. The number of jobs in real estate grew by 12,000 in April, and employment in mortgage brokerages rose by 4,000. Security brokerages continued to exhibit strong growth, adding 3,000 jobs over the month.

Wholesale trade employment grew by 11,000 over the month, with durable goods distribution adding 7,000 jobs. In retail trade, eating and drinking places added 33,000 jobs, recouping much of its March decline.

Employment in transportation and public utilities was relatively flat in April. A large gain in trucking (14,000) was offset by declines in air transportation and in local transportation (both -7,000). Government employment was little changed over the month.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls declined by 0.3 hour in April to 34.4 hours, seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing workweek dropped by 1.1 hour to 40.7 hours, and factory overtime fell by 0.8 hour to 3.9 hours. These declines reflect, in large part, the unusual timing of the Easter weekend in relation to the survey reference period. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls declined by 0.4 percent to 142.9 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index declined by 2.7 percent to 106.0. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls increased 4 cents in April to $12.67, seasonally adjusted. Reflecting the decline in the workweek, average weekly earnings decreased by 0.5 percent to $435.85. Over the year, average hourly and weekly earnings have risen by 4.4 and 4.1 percent, respectively. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 8, 1998.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 8, 1998Publication referenceMay 8, 199830 days laterJun 7, 1998
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.15%Observed 7.14%Observed −1 bps vs. earlier reference7.05%Observed −9 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 8, 1998 – Aug 8, 1998
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 8, 1998Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Feb 13, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.99% · Feb 20, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Feb 28, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · Mar 6, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.16% · Mar 13, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Mar 20, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Mar 27, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Apr 3, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Apr 10, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Apr 17, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Apr 24, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.22% · May 1, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 8, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · May 15, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.10% · May 22, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.07% · May 29, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.05% · Jun 5, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.04% · Jun 12, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Jun 19, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jun 26, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Jul 3, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Jul 10, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Jul 17, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jul 24, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.97% · Jul 31, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Aug 7, 1998Feb 8, 1998May 8, 1998Aug 8, 1998
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,024.19/month

7.14% · May 8, 1998

At the later reference$2,005.99/month

7.05% · Jun 5, 1998

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $18.20 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →