Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

February 1997 Employment Situation

Nonfarm payroll employment rose, and the unemployment rate was about unchanged at 5.3 percent in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The number of payroll jobs increased by 339,000…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Nonfarm payroll employment rose, and the unemployment rate was about unchanged at 5.3 percent in February, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The number of payroll jobs increased by 339,000 over the month; construction employment rose sharply, and there were gains throughout the service-producing sector. Average hourly earnings rose by 3 cents in February, and the average workweek rebounded from a weather-related drop in January.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed persons, 7.2 million, and the unemployment rate, 5.3 percent, were essentially unchanged in February, after seasonal adjustment. Jobless rates for the major demographic groups--adult men (4.4 percent), adult women (4.7 percent), teenagers (17.5 percent), whites (4.5 percent), blacks (11.3 percent), and Hispanics (8.1 percent)--showed little movement over the month. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment was about unchanged in February, at 128.4 million (seasonally adjusted), following a substantial increase in January. The proportion of the population that was employed (the employment-population ratio) was 63.5 percent.

The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons decreased by 165,000 in February to 4.3 million. This series has shown little definitive movement over the past year. (See table A-3.)

About 7.9 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in February. These multiple jobholders accounted for 6.2 percent of all employed persons, about the same proportion as a year earlier. (See table A-9.)

Both the civilian labor force, 135.6 million (seasonally adjusted), and the labor force participation rate, 67.0 percent, were essentially unchanged in February. Over the past year, the labor force has increased by 2.2 million (after adjusting for the change in population controls introduced in January), and the participation rate has risen by 0.4 percentage point.

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.5 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in February--that is, they wanted and were available for work and had looked for jobs sometime in the prior 12 months. The number of discouraged workers--a subset of the marginally attached who were not currently looking for jobs specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them or there were none for which they would qualify--was 364,000 in February. Both measures were lower than they were a year earlier. (See table A-9.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 339,000 in February to 121.3 million, after seasonal adjustment. Construction employment rose markedly, and there were widespread gains in most other major industry divisions. Manufacturing employment was little changed. (See table B-1.)

Construction employment increased by 109,000 in February. Job growth in construction has been strong since the end of 1995. In February, employment was buoyed by favorable weather conditions, following severe weather in January. The largest February gains were in outside activities, such as heavy construction, masonry, concrete, and roofing.

Employment in the services industry rose by 80,000 in February, following a much larger increase (136,000) in January. Employment in help supply services declined by 47,000 in February, partially offsetting a large increase in January. Both months’ estimates were strongly influenced by the effects of the 1996 blizzards, which lowered seasonal expectations for January and raised them for February. Job gains continued in computer services and in engineering and management services. In personal services, which includes tax return preparation, employment rose sharply for the second month in a row.

Transportation and public utilities added 21,000 jobs, reflecting strength in the trucking, air travel, transportation services, and communications industries. Wholesale trade also added 21,000 jobs, with most of the gain in the distribution of durable goods. Employment in finance (especially security brokerages, mortgage brokerages, and holding companies) and real estate continued to grow.

Employment in retail trade rose by 49,000 in February, led by a large seasonally adjusted increase in department stores. Before seasonal adjustment, department store employment levels typically decline in both January and February, as fewer workers are needed after the holidays. This year, however, more layoffs occurred in January, resulting in a smaller- than-usual decline in February. After seasonal adjustment, therefore, employment in department stores increased by 57,000. Food stores and auto dealers gained jobs in February. Employment was unchanged in building materials and garden supply stores and declined slightly in furniture stores; both of these industries experienced strong job growth in 1996.

Government employment advanced by 46,000. All of the growth was in education at the state and local levels. In January and February combined, state and local education added 66,000 jobs. Excluding education, state and local government payrolls were unchanged in February, and federal employment continued its downtrend.

Manufacturing employment was unchanged in February, following 4 months of gains that totaled 45,000. Aircraft and parts added jobs for the eighth month in a row. There was a decline of 6,000 jobs in autos, reversing a similar increase in January. Employment in the apparel industry continued its long-term slide, losing 5,000 jobs in February.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 0.8 hour in February to 35.0 hours, seasonally adjusted, more than reversing a weather-related 0.6 hour decline in January. The manufacturing workweek rose by 0.2 hour to 41.9 hours, and factory overtime edged up by 0.1 hour to 4.7 hours. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of private production or nonsupervisory workers on nonfarm payrolls rose by 2.7 percent, seasonally adjusted, to 140.8 (1982=100) in February, as both hours and employment increased. The manufacturing index increased by 0.7 percent to 106.8. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of private production or nonsupervisory workers on nonfarm payrolls rose by 3 cents in February to $12.09, seasonally adjusted. Reflecting the jump in the workweek, average weekly earnings advanced by 2.6 percent to $423.15. Over the past year, average hourly earnings rose by 3.8 percent and average weekly earnings increased by 5.3 percent. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 7, 1997.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 5, 1997Publication referenceMar 7, 199730 days laterApr 6, 1997
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.88%Observed 7.84%Observed −4 bps vs. earlier reference8.18%Observed +34 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 7, 1996 – Jun 7, 1997
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 7, 1997Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.00%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.57% · Dec 13, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.74% · Dec 20, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.64% · Dec 27, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.67% · Jan 3, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jan 10, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.87% · Jan 17, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jan 24, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Jan 31, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.74% · Feb 7, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Feb 14, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.56% · Feb 21, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Feb 28, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Mar 7, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Mar 14, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · Mar 21, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.97% · Mar 28, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.18% · Apr 4, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.15% · Apr 11, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Apr 18, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.08% · Apr 25, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.01% · May 2, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · May 9, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.91% · May 16, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.92% · May 23, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · May 30, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jun 6, 1997Dec 7, 1996Mar 7, 1997Jun 7, 1997
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,167.92/month

7.84% · Mar 7, 1997

At the later reference$2,239.05/month

8.18% · Apr 4, 1997

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $71.13 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →